Cargando…

Optimised Implant Selection Using Digital Volume Tomography (DVT) Osteodensitometry

PURPOSE: The density of the jaw bone has an inhomogeneous distribution and, even within partial volumes, varies more or less strongly from the size of typical implants. Consequently, the primary stability of implants using conventional techniques can only ever be determined postimplantation. The aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nilius, Manfred, Winterhoff, Jörg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8860539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35198250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2470524
_version_ 1784654697271918592
author Nilius, Manfred
Winterhoff, Jörg
author_facet Nilius, Manfred
Winterhoff, Jörg
author_sort Nilius, Manfred
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The density of the jaw bone has an inhomogeneous distribution and, even within partial volumes, varies more or less strongly from the size of typical implants. Consequently, the primary stability of implants using conventional techniques can only ever be determined postimplantation. The aim of the present case report is to present digital volume tomography (DVT) osteodensitometry as a procedure for assessing the primary stability preimplantation and to evaluate its benefits. METHODS: An orthopantomogram (OPT) and vertical sections, including bone density measurement, were obtained from a DVT in the course of preimplantological diagnosis. Conventional implant planning and densitometric simulation were performed on this basis. RESULTS: Densitometric simulation enabled assessment of the bone density at the interface to the implant body preimplantation. This procedure provides not only an overall value (averaged density) but also allocation of bone areas with different densities to the adjacent areas on the implant surface. This then allows the implant with the best possible macroscopic geometry and optimum position to be selected, with the aim of maximising primary stability. In the present case, the maximum torques during insertion confirmed the densitometric values recorded in advance. CONCLUSION: DVT osteodensitometry enables selection of an implant optimised to bone density distribution. At the same time, the point at which loading occurs can already be defined at the planning stage, thanks to the predictable primary stability. A standard integration of DVT osteodensitometry in the algorithms of implant planning software thus seems desirable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8860539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88605392022-02-22 Optimised Implant Selection Using Digital Volume Tomography (DVT) Osteodensitometry Nilius, Manfred Winterhoff, Jörg Case Rep Dent Case Report PURPOSE: The density of the jaw bone has an inhomogeneous distribution and, even within partial volumes, varies more or less strongly from the size of typical implants. Consequently, the primary stability of implants using conventional techniques can only ever be determined postimplantation. The aim of the present case report is to present digital volume tomography (DVT) osteodensitometry as a procedure for assessing the primary stability preimplantation and to evaluate its benefits. METHODS: An orthopantomogram (OPT) and vertical sections, including bone density measurement, were obtained from a DVT in the course of preimplantological diagnosis. Conventional implant planning and densitometric simulation were performed on this basis. RESULTS: Densitometric simulation enabled assessment of the bone density at the interface to the implant body preimplantation. This procedure provides not only an overall value (averaged density) but also allocation of bone areas with different densities to the adjacent areas on the implant surface. This then allows the implant with the best possible macroscopic geometry and optimum position to be selected, with the aim of maximising primary stability. In the present case, the maximum torques during insertion confirmed the densitometric values recorded in advance. CONCLUSION: DVT osteodensitometry enables selection of an implant optimised to bone density distribution. At the same time, the point at which loading occurs can already be defined at the planning stage, thanks to the predictable primary stability. A standard integration of DVT osteodensitometry in the algorithms of implant planning software thus seems desirable. Hindawi 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8860539/ /pubmed/35198250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2470524 Text en Copyright © 2022 Manfred Nilius and Jörg Winterhoff. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Nilius, Manfred
Winterhoff, Jörg
Optimised Implant Selection Using Digital Volume Tomography (DVT) Osteodensitometry
title Optimised Implant Selection Using Digital Volume Tomography (DVT) Osteodensitometry
title_full Optimised Implant Selection Using Digital Volume Tomography (DVT) Osteodensitometry
title_fullStr Optimised Implant Selection Using Digital Volume Tomography (DVT) Osteodensitometry
title_full_unstemmed Optimised Implant Selection Using Digital Volume Tomography (DVT) Osteodensitometry
title_short Optimised Implant Selection Using Digital Volume Tomography (DVT) Osteodensitometry
title_sort optimised implant selection using digital volume tomography (dvt) osteodensitometry
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8860539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35198250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2470524
work_keys_str_mv AT niliusmanfred optimisedimplantselectionusingdigitalvolumetomographydvtosteodensitometry
AT winterhoffjorg optimisedimplantselectionusingdigitalvolumetomographydvtosteodensitometry