Cargando…
Home training with or without joint mobilization compared to no treatment: a randomized controlled trial
[Purpose] To investigate if joint mobilization in patients with subacromial pain syndrome has additional benefits to a home training program on shoulder function and pain, and to compare home training to no physical therapy. [Participants and Methods] Eighty-nine primary care patients (mean age 45 y...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8860700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35221520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.34.153 |
_version_ | 1784654729196863488 |
---|---|
author | Eliason, Anna Werner, Suzanne Engström, Björn Harringe, Marita |
author_facet | Eliason, Anna Werner, Suzanne Engström, Björn Harringe, Marita |
author_sort | Eliason, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Purpose] To investigate if joint mobilization in patients with subacromial pain syndrome has additional benefits to a home training program on shoulder function and pain, and to compare home training to no physical therapy. [Participants and Methods] Eighty-nine primary care patients (mean age 45 years) with subacromial pain syndrome during an average of 23 weeks. Home training was performed twice a day during a 12 week period. One of the intervention groups received add-on shoulder joint mobilization to the home training. A third group did not receive any physical therapy. Constant-Murley score, pain and active range of motion was evaluated at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months. [Results] The total Constant-Murley score revealed no significant differences between groups at any time point. All groups improved over time. The add-on joint mobilization group reached clinical important change at 12 weeks. The subscale pain showed that both intervention groups reported less pain after 12 weeks compared to the reference group. [Conclusion] Home training is not superior to no treatment evaluated with the total Constant-Murley score. However, home training with or without add-on joint mobilization may decrease pain compared to no treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8860700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88607002022-02-24 Home training with or without joint mobilization compared to no treatment: a randomized controlled trial Eliason, Anna Werner, Suzanne Engström, Björn Harringe, Marita J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] To investigate if joint mobilization in patients with subacromial pain syndrome has additional benefits to a home training program on shoulder function and pain, and to compare home training to no physical therapy. [Participants and Methods] Eighty-nine primary care patients (mean age 45 years) with subacromial pain syndrome during an average of 23 weeks. Home training was performed twice a day during a 12 week period. One of the intervention groups received add-on shoulder joint mobilization to the home training. A third group did not receive any physical therapy. Constant-Murley score, pain and active range of motion was evaluated at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months. [Results] The total Constant-Murley score revealed no significant differences between groups at any time point. All groups improved over time. The add-on joint mobilization group reached clinical important change at 12 weeks. The subscale pain showed that both intervention groups reported less pain after 12 weeks compared to the reference group. [Conclusion] Home training is not superior to no treatment evaluated with the total Constant-Murley score. However, home training with or without add-on joint mobilization may decrease pain compared to no treatment. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2022-02-23 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8860700/ /pubmed/35221520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.34.153 Text en 2022©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Eliason, Anna Werner, Suzanne Engström, Björn Harringe, Marita Home training with or without joint mobilization compared to no treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Home training with or without joint mobilization compared to no treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Home training with or without joint mobilization compared to no treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Home training with or without joint mobilization compared to no treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Home training with or without joint mobilization compared to no treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Home training with or without joint mobilization compared to no treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | home training with or without joint mobilization compared to no treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8860700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35221520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.34.153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eliasonanna hometrainingwithorwithoutjointmobilizationcomparedtonotreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wernersuzanne hometrainingwithorwithoutjointmobilizationcomparedtonotreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT engstrombjorn hometrainingwithorwithoutjointmobilizationcomparedtonotreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT harringemarita hometrainingwithorwithoutjointmobilizationcomparedtonotreatmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial |