Cargando…

Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen diagnostic tests for saliva samples

Using saliva samples would facilitate sample collection, diagnostic feasibility, and mass screening of SARS-CoV-2. We tested two rapid antigen (RAD) immunochromatographic tests designed for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva: Rapid Response™ COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test Cassette for oral fluids and DI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hagbom, Marie, Carmona-Vicente, Noelia, Sharma, Sumit, Olsson, Henrik, Jämtberg, Mikael, Nilsdotter-Augustinsson, Åsa, Sjöwall, Johanna, Nordgren, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8860750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35233472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08998
_version_ 1784654741603614720
author Hagbom, Marie
Carmona-Vicente, Noelia
Sharma, Sumit
Olsson, Henrik
Jämtberg, Mikael
Nilsdotter-Augustinsson, Åsa
Sjöwall, Johanna
Nordgren, Johan
author_facet Hagbom, Marie
Carmona-Vicente, Noelia
Sharma, Sumit
Olsson, Henrik
Jämtberg, Mikael
Nilsdotter-Augustinsson, Åsa
Sjöwall, Johanna
Nordgren, Johan
author_sort Hagbom, Marie
collection PubMed
description Using saliva samples would facilitate sample collection, diagnostic feasibility, and mass screening of SARS-CoV-2. We tested two rapid antigen (RAD) immunochromatographic tests designed for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva: Rapid Response™ COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test Cassette for oral fluids and DIAGNOS™ COVID-19 Antigen Saliva Test. Evaluation of detection limit was performed with purified SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein and live SARS-CoV-2 virus. Sensitivity and specificity were further evaluated with reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) positive and negative saliva samples from hospitalized individuals with COVID-19 (n = 39) and healthcare workers (n = 20). DIAGNOS showed higher sensitivity than Rapid Response for both nucleocapsid protein and live virus. The limit of detection of the saliva test from DIAGNOS was further comparable with the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test designed for nasopharyngeal samples. DIAGNOS and Rapid Response detected nine (50.0%) and seven (38.9%), respectively, of the 18 RT-qPCR positive saliva samples. All RT-qPCR negative saliva (n = 41) were negative with both tests. Only one of the RT-qPCR positive saliva samples contained infectious virus as determined by cell culture and was also positive using the saliva RADs. The results show that the DIAGNOS may be an important and easy-to-use saliva RAD complement to detect SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals, but validation with a larger sample set is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8860750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88607502022-02-22 Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen diagnostic tests for saliva samples Hagbom, Marie Carmona-Vicente, Noelia Sharma, Sumit Olsson, Henrik Jämtberg, Mikael Nilsdotter-Augustinsson, Åsa Sjöwall, Johanna Nordgren, Johan Heliyon Research Article Using saliva samples would facilitate sample collection, diagnostic feasibility, and mass screening of SARS-CoV-2. We tested two rapid antigen (RAD) immunochromatographic tests designed for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva: Rapid Response™ COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test Cassette for oral fluids and DIAGNOS™ COVID-19 Antigen Saliva Test. Evaluation of detection limit was performed with purified SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein and live SARS-CoV-2 virus. Sensitivity and specificity were further evaluated with reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) positive and negative saliva samples from hospitalized individuals with COVID-19 (n = 39) and healthcare workers (n = 20). DIAGNOS showed higher sensitivity than Rapid Response for both nucleocapsid protein and live virus. The limit of detection of the saliva test from DIAGNOS was further comparable with the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test designed for nasopharyngeal samples. DIAGNOS and Rapid Response detected nine (50.0%) and seven (38.9%), respectively, of the 18 RT-qPCR positive saliva samples. All RT-qPCR negative saliva (n = 41) were negative with both tests. Only one of the RT-qPCR positive saliva samples contained infectious virus as determined by cell culture and was also positive using the saliva RADs. The results show that the DIAGNOS may be an important and easy-to-use saliva RAD complement to detect SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals, but validation with a larger sample set is warranted. Elsevier 2022-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8860750/ /pubmed/35233472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08998 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Hagbom, Marie
Carmona-Vicente, Noelia
Sharma, Sumit
Olsson, Henrik
Jämtberg, Mikael
Nilsdotter-Augustinsson, Åsa
Sjöwall, Johanna
Nordgren, Johan
Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen diagnostic tests for saliva samples
title Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen diagnostic tests for saliva samples
title_full Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen diagnostic tests for saliva samples
title_fullStr Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen diagnostic tests for saliva samples
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen diagnostic tests for saliva samples
title_short Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen diagnostic tests for saliva samples
title_sort evaluation of sars-cov-2 rapid antigen diagnostic tests for saliva samples
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8860750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35233472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08998
work_keys_str_mv AT hagbommarie evaluationofsarscov2rapidantigendiagnostictestsforsalivasamples
AT carmonavicentenoelia evaluationofsarscov2rapidantigendiagnostictestsforsalivasamples
AT sharmasumit evaluationofsarscov2rapidantigendiagnostictestsforsalivasamples
AT olssonhenrik evaluationofsarscov2rapidantigendiagnostictestsforsalivasamples
AT jamtbergmikael evaluationofsarscov2rapidantigendiagnostictestsforsalivasamples
AT nilsdotteraugustinssonasa evaluationofsarscov2rapidantigendiagnostictestsforsalivasamples
AT sjowalljohanna evaluationofsarscov2rapidantigendiagnostictestsforsalivasamples
AT nordgrenjohan evaluationofsarscov2rapidantigendiagnostictestsforsalivasamples