Cargando…

American Older Adults in COVID-19 Times: Vulnerability Types, Aging Attitudes, and Emotional Responses

The Coronavirus Disease (COVID) pandemic has aroused challenges to emotional well-being of the individuals. With 1,582 respondents from the Health and Retirement Survey (HRS), this study investigates the heterogeneity in older adults' vulnerability and examines the relationship between vulnerab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Mingqi, Guo, Jing, Chen, Xi, Han, Boxun, Ahmed, Farooq, Shahid, Muhammad, Zhang, Qilin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8860986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35211452
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.778084
_version_ 1784654784943357952
author Fu, Mingqi
Guo, Jing
Chen, Xi
Han, Boxun
Ahmed, Farooq
Shahid, Muhammad
Zhang, Qilin
author_facet Fu, Mingqi
Guo, Jing
Chen, Xi
Han, Boxun
Ahmed, Farooq
Shahid, Muhammad
Zhang, Qilin
author_sort Fu, Mingqi
collection PubMed
description The Coronavirus Disease (COVID) pandemic has aroused challenges to emotional well-being of the individuals. With 1,582 respondents from the Health and Retirement Survey (HRS), this study investigates the heterogeneity in older adults' vulnerability and examines the relationship between vulnerability types, aging attitudes, and emotional responses. International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-form (I-PANAS-SF) and Attitudes toward own aging (ATOT) were used to assess the emotional experiences and aging attitudes, and 14 kinds of pandemic-related deprivations evaluated vulnerability of individuals. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to explore the vulnerability types, and weighted linear regressions examined the relationship between vulnerability, aging attitudes, and emotional responses. The results showed that the proportion for individuals with mild vulnerability (MV), healthcare use vulnerability (HV), and dual vulnerability in healthcare use and financial sustainment (DVs) was 67, 22, and 11%, respectively. Older adults aged below 65, Hispanics and non-Hispanic Blacks, and those not eligible for Medicaid were more likely to have HV or DVs. The relationship between vulnerability and positive emotions (PAs) was non-significant, yet individuals with HV (beta = 0.10, standard error [SE] = 0.16) or DVs (beta = 0.09, SE = 0.28) were likely to have more negative emotions (NAs) than their mildly vulnerable counterparts. Furthermore, aging attitudes moderated the relationship between vulnerability and emotions. The salutary effect of positive aging attitudes on emotional well-being was more significant among people with DVs than those with MV (beta = 0.20, SE = 0.04 for positive responses; beta = −0.15, SE = 0.04 for negative responses). Thus, we urge more attention for vulnerable older adults in a pandemic context. Meanwhile, encouraging positive aging attitudes might be helpful for older adults to have better emotional well-being, especially for those with DVs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8860986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88609862022-02-23 American Older Adults in COVID-19 Times: Vulnerability Types, Aging Attitudes, and Emotional Responses Fu, Mingqi Guo, Jing Chen, Xi Han, Boxun Ahmed, Farooq Shahid, Muhammad Zhang, Qilin Front Public Health Public Health The Coronavirus Disease (COVID) pandemic has aroused challenges to emotional well-being of the individuals. With 1,582 respondents from the Health and Retirement Survey (HRS), this study investigates the heterogeneity in older adults' vulnerability and examines the relationship between vulnerability types, aging attitudes, and emotional responses. International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-form (I-PANAS-SF) and Attitudes toward own aging (ATOT) were used to assess the emotional experiences and aging attitudes, and 14 kinds of pandemic-related deprivations evaluated vulnerability of individuals. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to explore the vulnerability types, and weighted linear regressions examined the relationship between vulnerability, aging attitudes, and emotional responses. The results showed that the proportion for individuals with mild vulnerability (MV), healthcare use vulnerability (HV), and dual vulnerability in healthcare use and financial sustainment (DVs) was 67, 22, and 11%, respectively. Older adults aged below 65, Hispanics and non-Hispanic Blacks, and those not eligible for Medicaid were more likely to have HV or DVs. The relationship between vulnerability and positive emotions (PAs) was non-significant, yet individuals with HV (beta = 0.10, standard error [SE] = 0.16) or DVs (beta = 0.09, SE = 0.28) were likely to have more negative emotions (NAs) than their mildly vulnerable counterparts. Furthermore, aging attitudes moderated the relationship between vulnerability and emotions. The salutary effect of positive aging attitudes on emotional well-being was more significant among people with DVs than those with MV (beta = 0.20, SE = 0.04 for positive responses; beta = −0.15, SE = 0.04 for negative responses). Thus, we urge more attention for vulnerable older adults in a pandemic context. Meanwhile, encouraging positive aging attitudes might be helpful for older adults to have better emotional well-being, especially for those with DVs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8860986/ /pubmed/35211452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.778084 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fu, Guo, Chen, Han, Ahmed, Shahid and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Fu, Mingqi
Guo, Jing
Chen, Xi
Han, Boxun
Ahmed, Farooq
Shahid, Muhammad
Zhang, Qilin
American Older Adults in COVID-19 Times: Vulnerability Types, Aging Attitudes, and Emotional Responses
title American Older Adults in COVID-19 Times: Vulnerability Types, Aging Attitudes, and Emotional Responses
title_full American Older Adults in COVID-19 Times: Vulnerability Types, Aging Attitudes, and Emotional Responses
title_fullStr American Older Adults in COVID-19 Times: Vulnerability Types, Aging Attitudes, and Emotional Responses
title_full_unstemmed American Older Adults in COVID-19 Times: Vulnerability Types, Aging Attitudes, and Emotional Responses
title_short American Older Adults in COVID-19 Times: Vulnerability Types, Aging Attitudes, and Emotional Responses
title_sort american older adults in covid-19 times: vulnerability types, aging attitudes, and emotional responses
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8860986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35211452
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.778084
work_keys_str_mv AT fumingqi americanolderadultsincovid19timesvulnerabilitytypesagingattitudesandemotionalresponses
AT guojing americanolderadultsincovid19timesvulnerabilitytypesagingattitudesandemotionalresponses
AT chenxi americanolderadultsincovid19timesvulnerabilitytypesagingattitudesandemotionalresponses
AT hanboxun americanolderadultsincovid19timesvulnerabilitytypesagingattitudesandemotionalresponses
AT ahmedfarooq americanolderadultsincovid19timesvulnerabilitytypesagingattitudesandemotionalresponses
AT shahidmuhammad americanolderadultsincovid19timesvulnerabilitytypesagingattitudesandemotionalresponses
AT zhangqilin americanolderadultsincovid19timesvulnerabilitytypesagingattitudesandemotionalresponses