Cargando…

Reproducibility of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) to the noninvasive evaluation of hepatic steatosis

The aim of this study was to identify the applicability of an ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) for the noninvasive assessment of hepatic steatosis in clinical practice and to compare its correlation with B-mode ultrasound (US). From May to July 2021, 63 subjects with different body mas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Yanan, Jia, Minyue, Zhang, Chao, Feng, Xinxu, Chen, Jifan, Li, Qunying, Zhang, Yingying, Xu, Wen, Dong, Yiping, Jiang, Yifan, Liu, Yajing, Huang, Pintong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35190618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06879-0
_version_ 1784654800328065024
author Zhao, Yanan
Jia, Minyue
Zhang, Chao
Feng, Xinxu
Chen, Jifan
Li, Qunying
Zhang, Yingying
Xu, Wen
Dong, Yiping
Jiang, Yifan
Liu, Yajing
Huang, Pintong
author_facet Zhao, Yanan
Jia, Minyue
Zhang, Chao
Feng, Xinxu
Chen, Jifan
Li, Qunying
Zhang, Yingying
Xu, Wen
Dong, Yiping
Jiang, Yifan
Liu, Yajing
Huang, Pintong
author_sort Zhao, Yanan
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to identify the applicability of an ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) for the noninvasive assessment of hepatic steatosis in clinical practice and to compare its correlation with B-mode ultrasound (US). From May to July 2021, 63 subjects with different body mass index (BMI) grades were included in the prospective study. All of them performed UGAP measurements, under different breathing manipulations, positions, diet statuses, and operators. After that, the UGAP values were compared with the visual grades of hepatic steatosis on B-mode US using a 4-point scale method. The intraclass correlation (ICC) of the UGAP values between the two radiologists was 0.862 (p < 0.001), and the ICCs of the UGAP values on the same day and different days by radiologist A were 0.899 (p < 0.001) and 0.910 (p < 0.001), respectively. There were no significant differences in UGAP values under different breathing manipulations (p > 0.05), positions (p > 0.05), or diet statuses (p = 0.300). The UGAP values in the fasting (supine position, segment V, 1) condition among the lean (BMI < 24 kg/m(2)), overweight (24 kg/m(2) ≤ BMI < 28 kg/m(2)) and obese groups (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m(2)) were 0.60 ± 0.12, 0.66 ± 0.14, and 0.71 ± 0.11 dB/cm/MHz, respectively, with a significant difference (p = 0.006). The correlation coefficients (Rho) between the UGAP values and the visual grades of hepatic steatosis by the two reviewers were 0.845 (p < 0.001) and 0.850 (p < 0.001), corresponding to a strong relationship. Steatosis grades by reviewer 1 (p = 0.036) and reviewer 2 (p = 0.003) were significant factors determining the UGAP values according to the multivariate linear regression analysis. UGAP demonstrated excellent intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the assessment of hepatic steatosis. UGAP may be a promising tool in clinical practice to predict hepatic steatosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8861045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88610452022-02-22 Reproducibility of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) to the noninvasive evaluation of hepatic steatosis Zhao, Yanan Jia, Minyue Zhang, Chao Feng, Xinxu Chen, Jifan Li, Qunying Zhang, Yingying Xu, Wen Dong, Yiping Jiang, Yifan Liu, Yajing Huang, Pintong Sci Rep Article The aim of this study was to identify the applicability of an ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) for the noninvasive assessment of hepatic steatosis in clinical practice and to compare its correlation with B-mode ultrasound (US). From May to July 2021, 63 subjects with different body mass index (BMI) grades were included in the prospective study. All of them performed UGAP measurements, under different breathing manipulations, positions, diet statuses, and operators. After that, the UGAP values were compared with the visual grades of hepatic steatosis on B-mode US using a 4-point scale method. The intraclass correlation (ICC) of the UGAP values between the two radiologists was 0.862 (p < 0.001), and the ICCs of the UGAP values on the same day and different days by radiologist A were 0.899 (p < 0.001) and 0.910 (p < 0.001), respectively. There were no significant differences in UGAP values under different breathing manipulations (p > 0.05), positions (p > 0.05), or diet statuses (p = 0.300). The UGAP values in the fasting (supine position, segment V, 1) condition among the lean (BMI < 24 kg/m(2)), overweight (24 kg/m(2) ≤ BMI < 28 kg/m(2)) and obese groups (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m(2)) were 0.60 ± 0.12, 0.66 ± 0.14, and 0.71 ± 0.11 dB/cm/MHz, respectively, with a significant difference (p = 0.006). The correlation coefficients (Rho) between the UGAP values and the visual grades of hepatic steatosis by the two reviewers were 0.845 (p < 0.001) and 0.850 (p < 0.001), corresponding to a strong relationship. Steatosis grades by reviewer 1 (p = 0.036) and reviewer 2 (p = 0.003) were significant factors determining the UGAP values according to the multivariate linear regression analysis. UGAP demonstrated excellent intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the assessment of hepatic steatosis. UGAP may be a promising tool in clinical practice to predict hepatic steatosis. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8861045/ /pubmed/35190618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06879-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Zhao, Yanan
Jia, Minyue
Zhang, Chao
Feng, Xinxu
Chen, Jifan
Li, Qunying
Zhang, Yingying
Xu, Wen
Dong, Yiping
Jiang, Yifan
Liu, Yajing
Huang, Pintong
Reproducibility of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) to the noninvasive evaluation of hepatic steatosis
title Reproducibility of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) to the noninvasive evaluation of hepatic steatosis
title_full Reproducibility of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) to the noninvasive evaluation of hepatic steatosis
title_fullStr Reproducibility of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) to the noninvasive evaluation of hepatic steatosis
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) to the noninvasive evaluation of hepatic steatosis
title_short Reproducibility of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) to the noninvasive evaluation of hepatic steatosis
title_sort reproducibility of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (ugap) to the noninvasive evaluation of hepatic steatosis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35190618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06879-0
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoyanan reproducibilityofultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterugaptothenoninvasiveevaluationofhepaticsteatosis
AT jiaminyue reproducibilityofultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterugaptothenoninvasiveevaluationofhepaticsteatosis
AT zhangchao reproducibilityofultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterugaptothenoninvasiveevaluationofhepaticsteatosis
AT fengxinxu reproducibilityofultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterugaptothenoninvasiveevaluationofhepaticsteatosis
AT chenjifan reproducibilityofultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterugaptothenoninvasiveevaluationofhepaticsteatosis
AT liqunying reproducibilityofultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterugaptothenoninvasiveevaluationofhepaticsteatosis
AT zhangyingying reproducibilityofultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterugaptothenoninvasiveevaluationofhepaticsteatosis
AT xuwen reproducibilityofultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterugaptothenoninvasiveevaluationofhepaticsteatosis
AT dongyiping reproducibilityofultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterugaptothenoninvasiveevaluationofhepaticsteatosis
AT jiangyifan reproducibilityofultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterugaptothenoninvasiveevaluationofhepaticsteatosis
AT liuyajing reproducibilityofultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterugaptothenoninvasiveevaluationofhepaticsteatosis
AT huangpintong reproducibilityofultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterugaptothenoninvasiveevaluationofhepaticsteatosis