Cargando…

Universal Testing Policy for COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has spread at an accelerated rate. WHO reported that in the general population, the majority are either asymptomatic or mildly infected. In view of the high risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from a pregnant woman to her newborn, healthcare workers and oth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hashim, Nur Amirah Farhanah, Mahdy, Zaleha Abdullah, Abdul Rahman, Rahana, Kalok, Aida Hani Mohd, Sutan, Rosnah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35211434
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.588269
_version_ 1784654810295828480
author Hashim, Nur Amirah Farhanah
Mahdy, Zaleha Abdullah
Abdul Rahman, Rahana
Kalok, Aida Hani Mohd
Sutan, Rosnah
author_facet Hashim, Nur Amirah Farhanah
Mahdy, Zaleha Abdullah
Abdul Rahman, Rahana
Kalok, Aida Hani Mohd
Sutan, Rosnah
author_sort Hashim, Nur Amirah Farhanah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has spread at an accelerated rate. WHO reported that in the general population, the majority are either asymptomatic or mildly infected. In view of the high risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from a pregnant woman to her newborn, healthcare workers and other patients, it is a raised concern whether universal testing should be implemented in this targeted population. The current guidelines have not recommended a universal testing policy. In certain European countries, however, the policy was implemented by some hospitals in regions with high prevalence of COVID-19 infection. AIM(S): To assess the justification for universal screening of pregnant women for COVID-19 prior to admission in labor through systematic review of antenatal prevalence of asymptomatic infection, hence risk of inadvertent spread of infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three databases confined to PubMed, Ovid and Science Direct were used to search for articles from November 2019 onwards published in the English language. The search was conducted using the keywords “COVID-19” or “coronavirus” or “SARS-CoV-2” and “pregnancy” or “pregnant” or “obstetric” or “labor” and “universal” or “testing” or “prevalence”. The review was registered with PROSPERO. RESULTS: The search result retrieved 34 studies, with the majority consisting of retrospective cohort studies, while other studies such as prospective cohort study, research letters and a case series were also identified. A total of 19,958 pregnant women were universally tested until the date of report. Overall, the prevalence of universal testing among pregnant women presenting to labor and delivery units are higher in Western regions. From the total number of pregnant women 5.3% tested positive and among these, the majority (75.5%) did not manifest any symptoms at the time of testing. CONCLUSION: In areas with high prevalence of COVID-19 infection, the implementation of a universal testing policy among pregnant women presenting to labor and admission units may be cost effective in helping to curb disease transmission. SYSTEMATIC TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020184248, PROSPERO: CRD42020184248.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8861085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88610852022-02-23 Universal Testing Policy for COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review Hashim, Nur Amirah Farhanah Mahdy, Zaleha Abdullah Abdul Rahman, Rahana Kalok, Aida Hani Mohd Sutan, Rosnah Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has spread at an accelerated rate. WHO reported that in the general population, the majority are either asymptomatic or mildly infected. In view of the high risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from a pregnant woman to her newborn, healthcare workers and other patients, it is a raised concern whether universal testing should be implemented in this targeted population. The current guidelines have not recommended a universal testing policy. In certain European countries, however, the policy was implemented by some hospitals in regions with high prevalence of COVID-19 infection. AIM(S): To assess the justification for universal screening of pregnant women for COVID-19 prior to admission in labor through systematic review of antenatal prevalence of asymptomatic infection, hence risk of inadvertent spread of infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three databases confined to PubMed, Ovid and Science Direct were used to search for articles from November 2019 onwards published in the English language. The search was conducted using the keywords “COVID-19” or “coronavirus” or “SARS-CoV-2” and “pregnancy” or “pregnant” or “obstetric” or “labor” and “universal” or “testing” or “prevalence”. The review was registered with PROSPERO. RESULTS: The search result retrieved 34 studies, with the majority consisting of retrospective cohort studies, while other studies such as prospective cohort study, research letters and a case series were also identified. A total of 19,958 pregnant women were universally tested until the date of report. Overall, the prevalence of universal testing among pregnant women presenting to labor and delivery units are higher in Western regions. From the total number of pregnant women 5.3% tested positive and among these, the majority (75.5%) did not manifest any symptoms at the time of testing. CONCLUSION: In areas with high prevalence of COVID-19 infection, the implementation of a universal testing policy among pregnant women presenting to labor and admission units may be cost effective in helping to curb disease transmission. SYSTEMATIC TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020184248, PROSPERO: CRD42020184248. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8861085/ /pubmed/35211434 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.588269 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hashim, Mahdy, Abdul Rahman, Kalok and Sutan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Hashim, Nur Amirah Farhanah
Mahdy, Zaleha Abdullah
Abdul Rahman, Rahana
Kalok, Aida Hani Mohd
Sutan, Rosnah
Universal Testing Policy for COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review
title Universal Testing Policy for COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review
title_full Universal Testing Policy for COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Universal Testing Policy for COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Universal Testing Policy for COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review
title_short Universal Testing Policy for COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review
title_sort universal testing policy for covid-19 in pregnancy: a systematic review
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35211434
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.588269
work_keys_str_mv AT hashimnuramirahfarhanah universaltestingpolicyforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreview
AT mahdyzalehaabdullah universaltestingpolicyforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreview
AT abdulrahmanrahana universaltestingpolicyforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreview
AT kalokaidahanimohd universaltestingpolicyforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreview
AT sutanrosnah universaltestingpolicyforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreview