Cargando…
Universal Testing Policy for COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has spread at an accelerated rate. WHO reported that in the general population, the majority are either asymptomatic or mildly infected. In view of the high risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from a pregnant woman to her newborn, healthcare workers and oth...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35211434 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.588269 |
_version_ | 1784654810295828480 |
---|---|
author | Hashim, Nur Amirah Farhanah Mahdy, Zaleha Abdullah Abdul Rahman, Rahana Kalok, Aida Hani Mohd Sutan, Rosnah |
author_facet | Hashim, Nur Amirah Farhanah Mahdy, Zaleha Abdullah Abdul Rahman, Rahana Kalok, Aida Hani Mohd Sutan, Rosnah |
author_sort | Hashim, Nur Amirah Farhanah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has spread at an accelerated rate. WHO reported that in the general population, the majority are either asymptomatic or mildly infected. In view of the high risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from a pregnant woman to her newborn, healthcare workers and other patients, it is a raised concern whether universal testing should be implemented in this targeted population. The current guidelines have not recommended a universal testing policy. In certain European countries, however, the policy was implemented by some hospitals in regions with high prevalence of COVID-19 infection. AIM(S): To assess the justification for universal screening of pregnant women for COVID-19 prior to admission in labor through systematic review of antenatal prevalence of asymptomatic infection, hence risk of inadvertent spread of infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three databases confined to PubMed, Ovid and Science Direct were used to search for articles from November 2019 onwards published in the English language. The search was conducted using the keywords “COVID-19” or “coronavirus” or “SARS-CoV-2” and “pregnancy” or “pregnant” or “obstetric” or “labor” and “universal” or “testing” or “prevalence”. The review was registered with PROSPERO. RESULTS: The search result retrieved 34 studies, with the majority consisting of retrospective cohort studies, while other studies such as prospective cohort study, research letters and a case series were also identified. A total of 19,958 pregnant women were universally tested until the date of report. Overall, the prevalence of universal testing among pregnant women presenting to labor and delivery units are higher in Western regions. From the total number of pregnant women 5.3% tested positive and among these, the majority (75.5%) did not manifest any symptoms at the time of testing. CONCLUSION: In areas with high prevalence of COVID-19 infection, the implementation of a universal testing policy among pregnant women presenting to labor and admission units may be cost effective in helping to curb disease transmission. SYSTEMATIC TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020184248, PROSPERO: CRD42020184248. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8861085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88610852022-02-23 Universal Testing Policy for COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review Hashim, Nur Amirah Farhanah Mahdy, Zaleha Abdullah Abdul Rahman, Rahana Kalok, Aida Hani Mohd Sutan, Rosnah Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has spread at an accelerated rate. WHO reported that in the general population, the majority are either asymptomatic or mildly infected. In view of the high risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from a pregnant woman to her newborn, healthcare workers and other patients, it is a raised concern whether universal testing should be implemented in this targeted population. The current guidelines have not recommended a universal testing policy. In certain European countries, however, the policy was implemented by some hospitals in regions with high prevalence of COVID-19 infection. AIM(S): To assess the justification for universal screening of pregnant women for COVID-19 prior to admission in labor through systematic review of antenatal prevalence of asymptomatic infection, hence risk of inadvertent spread of infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three databases confined to PubMed, Ovid and Science Direct were used to search for articles from November 2019 onwards published in the English language. The search was conducted using the keywords “COVID-19” or “coronavirus” or “SARS-CoV-2” and “pregnancy” or “pregnant” or “obstetric” or “labor” and “universal” or “testing” or “prevalence”. The review was registered with PROSPERO. RESULTS: The search result retrieved 34 studies, with the majority consisting of retrospective cohort studies, while other studies such as prospective cohort study, research letters and a case series were also identified. A total of 19,958 pregnant women were universally tested until the date of report. Overall, the prevalence of universal testing among pregnant women presenting to labor and delivery units are higher in Western regions. From the total number of pregnant women 5.3% tested positive and among these, the majority (75.5%) did not manifest any symptoms at the time of testing. CONCLUSION: In areas with high prevalence of COVID-19 infection, the implementation of a universal testing policy among pregnant women presenting to labor and admission units may be cost effective in helping to curb disease transmission. SYSTEMATIC TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020184248, PROSPERO: CRD42020184248. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8861085/ /pubmed/35211434 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.588269 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hashim, Mahdy, Abdul Rahman, Kalok and Sutan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Hashim, Nur Amirah Farhanah Mahdy, Zaleha Abdullah Abdul Rahman, Rahana Kalok, Aida Hani Mohd Sutan, Rosnah Universal Testing Policy for COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review |
title | Universal Testing Policy for COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Universal Testing Policy for COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Universal Testing Policy for COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Universal Testing Policy for COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Universal Testing Policy for COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | universal testing policy for covid-19 in pregnancy: a systematic review |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35211434 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.588269 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hashimnuramirahfarhanah universaltestingpolicyforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreview AT mahdyzalehaabdullah universaltestingpolicyforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreview AT abdulrahmanrahana universaltestingpolicyforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreview AT kalokaidahanimohd universaltestingpolicyforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreview AT sutanrosnah universaltestingpolicyforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreview |