Cargando…

Spot-scanning proton therapy for targets with adjacent cardiac implantable electronic devices – Strategies for breast and head & neck cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) malfunctions can be induced by secondary neutron dose from spot-scanning proton therapy. A recent in-vitro study investigating secondary neutron dose to CIEDs up to 7 mSv per fraction found that exposure of secondary neutrons in th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stick, Line Bjerregaard, Lægdsmand, Peter Magnus Trock, Bjerre, Henrik Laurits, Høyer, Morten, Jensen, Kenneth, Jensen, Maria Fuglsang, Kronborg, Mads Brix, Offersen, Birgitte Vrou, Kronborg, Camilla Jensenius Skovhus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35243034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.02.006
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) malfunctions can be induced by secondary neutron dose from spot-scanning proton therapy. A recent in-vitro study investigating secondary neutron dose to CIEDs up to 7 mSv per fraction found that exposure of secondary neutrons in this range was clinically manageable. This study presents decision algorithms proposed by a national expert group for selection of patients with breast and head & neck (H&N) cancer with CIEDs adjacent to target for proton therapy based on the 7 mSv threshold. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients with breast cancer and five with H&N cancer were included in the study. Five patients with breast cancer received photon therapy with CIED and proton plans were retrospectively created. The remaining patients received proton therapy without CIED and a worst-case position of a virtual CIED was retrospectively delineated. Secondary neutron dose was estimated as ambient dose equivalent H*(10) using Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: For patients with breast cancer and with contralateral CIED, the secondary neutron dose to the CIED was below 7 mSv per fraction for CTV < 1500 cm(3) in 2 Gy fractions and CTV < 1000 cm(3) in 2.67 Gy fractions. The secondary neutron dose to the CIED was below 7 mSv per fraction for all patients with H&N cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Simulations of neutron exposure suggest that proton therapy is feasible for most patients with CIED adjacent to target. This forms the basis for decision algorithms for selection of patients with CIED for proton therapy.