Cargando…

Emergency Department Utilization Among Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: To evaluate predictors of emergency department (ED) utilization by adult patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) and interventions to reduce ED utilization by HD patients. STUDY DESIGN: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Gregory, Bohmart, Andrew, Shaaban, Heba, Mages, Keith, Jedlicka, Caroline, Zhang, Yiye, Steel, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35243303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2021.09.007
_version_ 1784654965475639296
author Han, Gregory
Bohmart, Andrew
Shaaban, Heba
Mages, Keith
Jedlicka, Caroline
Zhang, Yiye
Steel, Peter
author_facet Han, Gregory
Bohmart, Andrew
Shaaban, Heba
Mages, Keith
Jedlicka, Caroline
Zhang, Yiye
Steel, Peter
author_sort Han, Gregory
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: To evaluate predictors of emergency department (ED) utilization by adult patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) and interventions to reduce ED utilization by HD patients. STUDY DESIGN: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials and observational studies published until April 2020. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: We included studies that investigated predictors of ED utilization and/or interventions to reduce ED utilization in HD patients. We extracted data regarding the study design and study population and results regarding ED utilization from 38 studies using Excel software. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: We performed a narrative synthesis to group articles that investigated similar themes. RESULTS: 1,060 titles and abstracts were screened, of which 98 were selected for full-text review. In total, 38 studies met the inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction. Quality was high according to the Downs and Black tool, with 11 studies rated as good, 22 as fair, and 5 as poor. 34 studies described predictors of ED utilization, whereas 4 studies investigated interventions in which ED utilization was studied. Our narrative synthesis produced 8 concept subgroups in the core concepts of access to care, comorbid condition burden, and new health care models. Poor access to care and a high comorbid condition burden are associated with increased ED use. No ED-based interventions designed to reduce ED utilization were identified, but recent changes in health care systems, like the formation of End-Stage Renal Disease Seamless Care Organizations and greater involvement of palliative care services, are associated with improved outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Clinical heterogeneity and variability in the included studies precluded a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: HD patients’ high ED use is multifactorial. Further research is required to understand and predict ED utilization in this vulnerable population, which will facilitate the development of interventions to reduce avoidable ED use. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020196569
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8861946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88619462022-03-02 Emergency Department Utilization Among Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review Han, Gregory Bohmart, Andrew Shaaban, Heba Mages, Keith Jedlicka, Caroline Zhang, Yiye Steel, Peter Kidney Med Original Research RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: To evaluate predictors of emergency department (ED) utilization by adult patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) and interventions to reduce ED utilization by HD patients. STUDY DESIGN: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials and observational studies published until April 2020. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: We included studies that investigated predictors of ED utilization and/or interventions to reduce ED utilization in HD patients. We extracted data regarding the study design and study population and results regarding ED utilization from 38 studies using Excel software. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: We performed a narrative synthesis to group articles that investigated similar themes. RESULTS: 1,060 titles and abstracts were screened, of which 98 were selected for full-text review. In total, 38 studies met the inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction. Quality was high according to the Downs and Black tool, with 11 studies rated as good, 22 as fair, and 5 as poor. 34 studies described predictors of ED utilization, whereas 4 studies investigated interventions in which ED utilization was studied. Our narrative synthesis produced 8 concept subgroups in the core concepts of access to care, comorbid condition burden, and new health care models. Poor access to care and a high comorbid condition burden are associated with increased ED use. No ED-based interventions designed to reduce ED utilization were identified, but recent changes in health care systems, like the formation of End-Stage Renal Disease Seamless Care Organizations and greater involvement of palliative care services, are associated with improved outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Clinical heterogeneity and variability in the included studies precluded a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: HD patients’ high ED use is multifactorial. Further research is required to understand and predict ED utilization in this vulnerable population, which will facilitate the development of interventions to reduce avoidable ED use. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020196569 Elsevier 2021-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8861946/ /pubmed/35243303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2021.09.007 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Han, Gregory
Bohmart, Andrew
Shaaban, Heba
Mages, Keith
Jedlicka, Caroline
Zhang, Yiye
Steel, Peter
Emergency Department Utilization Among Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review
title Emergency Department Utilization Among Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review
title_full Emergency Department Utilization Among Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Emergency Department Utilization Among Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Emergency Department Utilization Among Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review
title_short Emergency Department Utilization Among Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review
title_sort emergency department utilization among maintenance hemodialysis patients: a systematic review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35243303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2021.09.007
work_keys_str_mv AT hangregory emergencydepartmentutilizationamongmaintenancehemodialysispatientsasystematicreview
AT bohmartandrew emergencydepartmentutilizationamongmaintenancehemodialysispatientsasystematicreview
AT shaabanheba emergencydepartmentutilizationamongmaintenancehemodialysispatientsasystematicreview
AT mageskeith emergencydepartmentutilizationamongmaintenancehemodialysispatientsasystematicreview
AT jedlickacaroline emergencydepartmentutilizationamongmaintenancehemodialysispatientsasystematicreview
AT zhangyiye emergencydepartmentutilizationamongmaintenancehemodialysispatientsasystematicreview
AT steelpeter emergencydepartmentutilizationamongmaintenancehemodialysispatientsasystematicreview