Cargando…

Real-world biomarker testing rate and positivity rate in NSCLC in Spain: Prospective Central Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing Registry (LungPath) from the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP)

AIM: The aim of this study was to describe the testing rate and frequency of molecular alterations observed in the Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing Registry (LungPath). METHODS: A descriptive study of NSCLC biomarker determinations collected from March 2018 to January 2019, from 38 Spanish hospitals, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salas, Clara, Martín-López, Javier, Martínez-Pozo, Antonio, Hernández-Iglesias, Teresa, Carcedo, David, Ruiz de Alda, Lucia, García, J Francisco, Rojo, Federico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33722840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2020-207280
_version_ 1784654993488347136
author Salas, Clara
Martín-López, Javier
Martínez-Pozo, Antonio
Hernández-Iglesias, Teresa
Carcedo, David
Ruiz de Alda, Lucia
García, J Francisco
Rojo, Federico
author_facet Salas, Clara
Martín-López, Javier
Martínez-Pozo, Antonio
Hernández-Iglesias, Teresa
Carcedo, David
Ruiz de Alda, Lucia
García, J Francisco
Rojo, Federico
author_sort Salas, Clara
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study was to describe the testing rate and frequency of molecular alterations observed in the Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing Registry (LungPath). METHODS: A descriptive study of NSCLC biomarker determinations collected from March 2018 to January 2019, from 38 Spanish hospitals, was carried out. Only adenocarcinoma and not otherwise specified histologies were included for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. The testing rate and the positivity rate were calculated. Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore the joint relationship between independent explanatory factors and both testing and positivity rates. Two models were adjusted: one with sample type and histology as independent factors, and the other adding the testing rate or the positivity rate of the other biomarkers. RESULTS: 3226 patient samples were analysed, where EGFR, ALK, ROS1 and PD-L1 information was collected (a total of 12 904 determinations). Overall, 9118 (71.4%) determinations were finally assessed. EGFR (91.4%) and ALK (80.1%) were the mainly tested biomarkers. Positivity rates for EGFR, ALK, ROS1 and PD-L1 were 13.6%, 3.4%, 2.0% and 49.2%, respectively. Multivariate models showed a lower testing rate for ALK in surgical pieces, fine-needle aspiration or other types of samples versus biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high testing rate in EGFR and ALK in NSCLC, the real-world evidence obtained from the LungPath demonstrates that ROS1 and PD-L1 were not determined in a significant portion of patients. LungPath provides crucial information to improve the coverage in molecular testing in lung cancer, to monitor the positivity rate and the introduction of new biomarker testing in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8862081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88620812022-03-15 Real-world biomarker testing rate and positivity rate in NSCLC in Spain: Prospective Central Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing Registry (LungPath) from the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) Salas, Clara Martín-López, Javier Martínez-Pozo, Antonio Hernández-Iglesias, Teresa Carcedo, David Ruiz de Alda, Lucia García, J Francisco Rojo, Federico J Clin Pathol Original Research AIM: The aim of this study was to describe the testing rate and frequency of molecular alterations observed in the Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing Registry (LungPath). METHODS: A descriptive study of NSCLC biomarker determinations collected from March 2018 to January 2019, from 38 Spanish hospitals, was carried out. Only adenocarcinoma and not otherwise specified histologies were included for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. The testing rate and the positivity rate were calculated. Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore the joint relationship between independent explanatory factors and both testing and positivity rates. Two models were adjusted: one with sample type and histology as independent factors, and the other adding the testing rate or the positivity rate of the other biomarkers. RESULTS: 3226 patient samples were analysed, where EGFR, ALK, ROS1 and PD-L1 information was collected (a total of 12 904 determinations). Overall, 9118 (71.4%) determinations were finally assessed. EGFR (91.4%) and ALK (80.1%) were the mainly tested biomarkers. Positivity rates for EGFR, ALK, ROS1 and PD-L1 were 13.6%, 3.4%, 2.0% and 49.2%, respectively. Multivariate models showed a lower testing rate for ALK in surgical pieces, fine-needle aspiration or other types of samples versus biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high testing rate in EGFR and ALK in NSCLC, the real-world evidence obtained from the LungPath demonstrates that ROS1 and PD-L1 were not determined in a significant portion of patients. LungPath provides crucial information to improve the coverage in molecular testing in lung cancer, to monitor the positivity rate and the introduction of new biomarker testing in clinical practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03 2021-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8862081/ /pubmed/33722840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2020-207280 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Salas, Clara
Martín-López, Javier
Martínez-Pozo, Antonio
Hernández-Iglesias, Teresa
Carcedo, David
Ruiz de Alda, Lucia
García, J Francisco
Rojo, Federico
Real-world biomarker testing rate and positivity rate in NSCLC in Spain: Prospective Central Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing Registry (LungPath) from the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP)
title Real-world biomarker testing rate and positivity rate in NSCLC in Spain: Prospective Central Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing Registry (LungPath) from the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP)
title_full Real-world biomarker testing rate and positivity rate in NSCLC in Spain: Prospective Central Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing Registry (LungPath) from the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP)
title_fullStr Real-world biomarker testing rate and positivity rate in NSCLC in Spain: Prospective Central Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing Registry (LungPath) from the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP)
title_full_unstemmed Real-world biomarker testing rate and positivity rate in NSCLC in Spain: Prospective Central Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing Registry (LungPath) from the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP)
title_short Real-world biomarker testing rate and positivity rate in NSCLC in Spain: Prospective Central Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing Registry (LungPath) from the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP)
title_sort real-world biomarker testing rate and positivity rate in nsclc in spain: prospective central lung cancer biomarker testing registry (lungpath) from the spanish society of pathology (seap)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33722840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2020-207280
work_keys_str_mv AT salasclara realworldbiomarkertestingrateandpositivityrateinnsclcinspainprospectivecentrallungcancerbiomarkertestingregistrylungpathfromthespanishsocietyofpathologyseap
AT martinlopezjavier realworldbiomarkertestingrateandpositivityrateinnsclcinspainprospectivecentrallungcancerbiomarkertestingregistrylungpathfromthespanishsocietyofpathologyseap
AT martinezpozoantonio realworldbiomarkertestingrateandpositivityrateinnsclcinspainprospectivecentrallungcancerbiomarkertestingregistrylungpathfromthespanishsocietyofpathologyseap
AT hernandeziglesiasteresa realworldbiomarkertestingrateandpositivityrateinnsclcinspainprospectivecentrallungcancerbiomarkertestingregistrylungpathfromthespanishsocietyofpathologyseap
AT carcedodavid realworldbiomarkertestingrateandpositivityrateinnsclcinspainprospectivecentrallungcancerbiomarkertestingregistrylungpathfromthespanishsocietyofpathologyseap
AT ruizdealdalucia realworldbiomarkertestingrateandpositivityrateinnsclcinspainprospectivecentrallungcancerbiomarkertestingregistrylungpathfromthespanishsocietyofpathologyseap
AT garciajfrancisco realworldbiomarkertestingrateandpositivityrateinnsclcinspainprospectivecentrallungcancerbiomarkertestingregistrylungpathfromthespanishsocietyofpathologyseap
AT rojofederico realworldbiomarkertestingrateandpositivityrateinnsclcinspainprospectivecentrallungcancerbiomarkertestingregistrylungpathfromthespanishsocietyofpathologyseap