Cargando…
A protocol for a scoping review to map the assessment approaches in optometry education programmes globally
BACKGROUND: The training of optometrists aims to prepare practitioners with critical thinking skills who utilise their education and experience to solve clinical problems in real-life practice. Professional competencies should inform assessment, and as such, assessment methods for learning should en...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01906-7 |
_version_ | 1784655012167680000 |
---|---|
author | van Staden, Diane Chetty, Verusia Munsamy, Alvin Jeffrey |
author_facet | van Staden, Diane Chetty, Verusia Munsamy, Alvin Jeffrey |
author_sort | van Staden, Diane |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The training of optometrists aims to prepare practitioners with critical thinking skills who utilise their education and experience to solve clinical problems in real-life practice. Professional competencies should inform assessment, and as such, assessment methods for learning should encompass a wide range of approaches. The objective of this scoping review is therefore to map assessment approaches utilised within optometry education programmes globally. METHODS: This study is a scoping review based on the PRISMA methodology. The review will be guided by the following research question, “What are the assessment approaches that inform optometry training globally?”. This was validated by the Population-Concept-Context framework according to the methodology for Joanna Briggs Institution Scoping Reviews. Relevant peer-reviewed studies and grey literature conducted during the last 10 years will be identified from electronic databases including CINAHL, PubMed, PROquest and ERIC. The search strings using keywords such as “Optometry students and staff”, “Assessments” and “Optometry education” will be conducted using Boolean logic. An independent reviewer will conduct all title screening, two independent reviewers will conduct abstract and full article screening, followed by data extraction. Thereafter, a thematic analysis will be conducted. The Mixed Method Appraisal Tool version 2018 will be used for quality appraisal of mapped studies. DISCUSSION: The review will document evidence of assessment approaches utilised in optometry training globally. Considering the exit level competencies required in the basic job function of an optometrist, a coherence in assessment approaches and relevant rationale for these would be expected, if the accredited (regulated) training programmes follow a competency-based model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8862206 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88622062022-02-23 A protocol for a scoping review to map the assessment approaches in optometry education programmes globally van Staden, Diane Chetty, Verusia Munsamy, Alvin Jeffrey Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: The training of optometrists aims to prepare practitioners with critical thinking skills who utilise their education and experience to solve clinical problems in real-life practice. Professional competencies should inform assessment, and as such, assessment methods for learning should encompass a wide range of approaches. The objective of this scoping review is therefore to map assessment approaches utilised within optometry education programmes globally. METHODS: This study is a scoping review based on the PRISMA methodology. The review will be guided by the following research question, “What are the assessment approaches that inform optometry training globally?”. This was validated by the Population-Concept-Context framework according to the methodology for Joanna Briggs Institution Scoping Reviews. Relevant peer-reviewed studies and grey literature conducted during the last 10 years will be identified from electronic databases including CINAHL, PubMed, PROquest and ERIC. The search strings using keywords such as “Optometry students and staff”, “Assessments” and “Optometry education” will be conducted using Boolean logic. An independent reviewer will conduct all title screening, two independent reviewers will conduct abstract and full article screening, followed by data extraction. Thereafter, a thematic analysis will be conducted. The Mixed Method Appraisal Tool version 2018 will be used for quality appraisal of mapped studies. DISCUSSION: The review will document evidence of assessment approaches utilised in optometry training globally. Considering the exit level competencies required in the basic job function of an optometrist, a coherence in assessment approaches and relevant rationale for these would be expected, if the accredited (regulated) training programmes follow a competency-based model. BioMed Central 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8862206/ /pubmed/35193685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01906-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Protocol van Staden, Diane Chetty, Verusia Munsamy, Alvin Jeffrey A protocol for a scoping review to map the assessment approaches in optometry education programmes globally |
title | A protocol for a scoping review to map the assessment approaches in optometry education programmes globally |
title_full | A protocol for a scoping review to map the assessment approaches in optometry education programmes globally |
title_fullStr | A protocol for a scoping review to map the assessment approaches in optometry education programmes globally |
title_full_unstemmed | A protocol for a scoping review to map the assessment approaches in optometry education programmes globally |
title_short | A protocol for a scoping review to map the assessment approaches in optometry education programmes globally |
title_sort | protocol for a scoping review to map the assessment approaches in optometry education programmes globally |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01906-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanstadendiane aprotocolforascopingreviewtomaptheassessmentapproachesinoptometryeducationprogrammesglobally AT chettyverusia aprotocolforascopingreviewtomaptheassessmentapproachesinoptometryeducationprogrammesglobally AT munsamyalvinjeffrey aprotocolforascopingreviewtomaptheassessmentapproachesinoptometryeducationprogrammesglobally AT vanstadendiane protocolforascopingreviewtomaptheassessmentapproachesinoptometryeducationprogrammesglobally AT chettyverusia protocolforascopingreviewtomaptheassessmentapproachesinoptometryeducationprogrammesglobally AT munsamyalvinjeffrey protocolforascopingreviewtomaptheassessmentapproachesinoptometryeducationprogrammesglobally |