Cargando…

Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in modulating cortical excitability in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has attracted plenty of attention as it has been proved to be effective in facilitating motor recovery in patients with stroke. The aim of this study was to systematically review the effects of repetitive TMS (rTMS) and theta burst stimulation (TBS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bai, Zhongfei, Zhang, Jiaqi, Fong, Kenneth N. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-00999-4
_version_ 1784655027642564608
author Bai, Zhongfei
Zhang, Jiaqi
Fong, Kenneth N. K.
author_facet Bai, Zhongfei
Zhang, Jiaqi
Fong, Kenneth N. K.
author_sort Bai, Zhongfei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has attracted plenty of attention as it has been proved to be effective in facilitating motor recovery in patients with stroke. The aim of this study was to systematically review the effects of repetitive TMS (rTMS) and theta burst stimulation (TBS) protocols in modulating cortical excitability after stroke. METHODS: A literature search was carried out using PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PEDro, to identify studies that investigated the effects of four rTMS protocols—low and high frequency rTMS, intermittent and continuous TBS, on TMS measures of cortical excitability in stroke. A random-effects model was used for all meta-analyses. RESULTS: Sixty-one studies were included in the current review. Low frequency rTMS was effective in decreasing individuals’ resting motor threshold and increasing the motor-evoked potential of the non-stimulated M1 (affected M1), while opposite effects occurred in the stimulated M1 (unaffected M1). High frequency rTMS enhanced the cortical excitability of the affected M1 alone. Intermittent TBS also showed superior effects in rebalancing bilateral excitability through increasing and decreasing excitability within the affected and unaffected M1, respectively. Due to the limited number of studies found, the effects of continuous TBS remained inconclusive. Motor impairment was significantly correlated with various forms of TMS measures. CONCLUSIONS: Except for continuous TBS, it is evident that these protocols are effective in modulating cortical excitability in stroke. Current evidence does support the effects of inhibitory stimulation in enhancing the cortical excitability of the affected M1. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-022-00999-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8862292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88622922022-02-23 Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in modulating cortical excitability in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis Bai, Zhongfei Zhang, Jiaqi Fong, Kenneth N. K. J Neuroeng Rehabil Review BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has attracted plenty of attention as it has been proved to be effective in facilitating motor recovery in patients with stroke. The aim of this study was to systematically review the effects of repetitive TMS (rTMS) and theta burst stimulation (TBS) protocols in modulating cortical excitability after stroke. METHODS: A literature search was carried out using PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PEDro, to identify studies that investigated the effects of four rTMS protocols—low and high frequency rTMS, intermittent and continuous TBS, on TMS measures of cortical excitability in stroke. A random-effects model was used for all meta-analyses. RESULTS: Sixty-one studies were included in the current review. Low frequency rTMS was effective in decreasing individuals’ resting motor threshold and increasing the motor-evoked potential of the non-stimulated M1 (affected M1), while opposite effects occurred in the stimulated M1 (unaffected M1). High frequency rTMS enhanced the cortical excitability of the affected M1 alone. Intermittent TBS also showed superior effects in rebalancing bilateral excitability through increasing and decreasing excitability within the affected and unaffected M1, respectively. Due to the limited number of studies found, the effects of continuous TBS remained inconclusive. Motor impairment was significantly correlated with various forms of TMS measures. CONCLUSIONS: Except for continuous TBS, it is evident that these protocols are effective in modulating cortical excitability in stroke. Current evidence does support the effects of inhibitory stimulation in enhancing the cortical excitability of the affected M1. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-022-00999-4. BioMed Central 2022-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8862292/ /pubmed/35193624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-00999-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Bai, Zhongfei
Zhang, Jiaqi
Fong, Kenneth N. K.
Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in modulating cortical excitability in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in modulating cortical excitability in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in modulating cortical excitability in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in modulating cortical excitability in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in modulating cortical excitability in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in modulating cortical excitability in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in modulating cortical excitability in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-00999-4
work_keys_str_mv AT baizhongfei effectsoftranscranialmagneticstimulationinmodulatingcorticalexcitabilityinpatientswithstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangjiaqi effectsoftranscranialmagneticstimulationinmodulatingcorticalexcitabilityinpatientswithstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fongkennethnk effectsoftranscranialmagneticstimulationinmodulatingcorticalexcitabilityinpatientswithstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis