Cargando…
Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sOlution versus an Electrolyte solutioN In patients undergoing eleCtive abdominal Surgery: study protocol for the PHOENICS study
BACKGROUND: Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions are used for volume therapy to treat hypovolemia due to acute blood loss and to maintain hemodynamic stability. This study was requested by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to provide more evidence on the long-term safety and efficacy of HES solutio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06058-6 |
_version_ | 1784655029847719936 |
---|---|
author | Buhre, Wolfgang de Korte-de Boer, Dianne de Abreu, Marcelo Gama Scheeren, Thomas Gruenewald, Matthias Hoeft, Andreas Spahn, Donat R. Zarbock, Alexander Daamen, Sylvia Westphal, Martin Brauer, Ute Dehnhardt, Tamara Schmier, Sonja Baron, Jean-Francois De Hert, Stefan Gavranović, Željka Cholley, Bernard Vymazal, Tomas Szczeklik, Wojciech Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar Soro Domingo, Marina Blanca Grintescu, Ioana Jankovic, Radmilo Belda, Javier |
author_facet | Buhre, Wolfgang de Korte-de Boer, Dianne de Abreu, Marcelo Gama Scheeren, Thomas Gruenewald, Matthias Hoeft, Andreas Spahn, Donat R. Zarbock, Alexander Daamen, Sylvia Westphal, Martin Brauer, Ute Dehnhardt, Tamara Schmier, Sonja Baron, Jean-Francois De Hert, Stefan Gavranović, Željka Cholley, Bernard Vymazal, Tomas Szczeklik, Wojciech Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar Soro Domingo, Marina Blanca Grintescu, Ioana Jankovic, Radmilo Belda, Javier |
author_sort | Buhre, Wolfgang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions are used for volume therapy to treat hypovolemia due to acute blood loss and to maintain hemodynamic stability. This study was requested by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to provide more evidence on the long-term safety and efficacy of HES solutions in the perioperative setting. METHODS: PHOENICS is a randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational phase IV (IIIb) study with two parallel groups to investigate non-inferiority regarding the safety of a 6% HES 130 solution (Volulyte 6%, Fresenius Kabi, Germany) compared with a crystalloid solution (Ionolyte, Fresenius Kabi, Germany) for infusion in patients with acute blood loss during elective abdominal surgery. A total of 2280 eligible patients (male and female patients willing to participate, with expected blood loss ≥ 500 ml, aged > 40 and ≤ 85 years, and ASA Physical status II–III) are randomly assigned to receive either HES or crystalloid solution for the treatment of hypovolemia due to surgery-induced acute blood loss in hospitals in up to 11 European countries. The dosing of investigational products (IP) is individualized to patients’ volume needs and guided by a volume algorithm. Patients are treated with IP for maximally 24 h or until the maximum daily dose of 30 ml/kg body weight is reached. The primary endpoint is the treatment group mean difference in the change from the pre-operative baseline value in cystatin-C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), to the eGFR value calculated from the highest cystatin-C level measured during post-operative days 1-3. Further safety and efficacy parameters include, e.g., combined mortality/major post-operative complications until day 90, renal function, coagulation, inflammation, hemodynamic variables, hospital length of stay, major post-operative complications, and 28-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality. DISCUSSION: The study will provide important information on the long-term safety and efficacy of HES 130/0.4 when administered according to the approved European product information. The results will be relevant for volume therapy of surgical patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2016-002162-30. ClinicalTrials.govNCT03278548 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8862305 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88623052022-02-23 Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sOlution versus an Electrolyte solutioN In patients undergoing eleCtive abdominal Surgery: study protocol for the PHOENICS study Buhre, Wolfgang de Korte-de Boer, Dianne de Abreu, Marcelo Gama Scheeren, Thomas Gruenewald, Matthias Hoeft, Andreas Spahn, Donat R. Zarbock, Alexander Daamen, Sylvia Westphal, Martin Brauer, Ute Dehnhardt, Tamara Schmier, Sonja Baron, Jean-Francois De Hert, Stefan Gavranović, Željka Cholley, Bernard Vymazal, Tomas Szczeklik, Wojciech Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar Soro Domingo, Marina Blanca Grintescu, Ioana Jankovic, Radmilo Belda, Javier Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions are used for volume therapy to treat hypovolemia due to acute blood loss and to maintain hemodynamic stability. This study was requested by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to provide more evidence on the long-term safety and efficacy of HES solutions in the perioperative setting. METHODS: PHOENICS is a randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational phase IV (IIIb) study with two parallel groups to investigate non-inferiority regarding the safety of a 6% HES 130 solution (Volulyte 6%, Fresenius Kabi, Germany) compared with a crystalloid solution (Ionolyte, Fresenius Kabi, Germany) for infusion in patients with acute blood loss during elective abdominal surgery. A total of 2280 eligible patients (male and female patients willing to participate, with expected blood loss ≥ 500 ml, aged > 40 and ≤ 85 years, and ASA Physical status II–III) are randomly assigned to receive either HES or crystalloid solution for the treatment of hypovolemia due to surgery-induced acute blood loss in hospitals in up to 11 European countries. The dosing of investigational products (IP) is individualized to patients’ volume needs and guided by a volume algorithm. Patients are treated with IP for maximally 24 h or until the maximum daily dose of 30 ml/kg body weight is reached. The primary endpoint is the treatment group mean difference in the change from the pre-operative baseline value in cystatin-C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), to the eGFR value calculated from the highest cystatin-C level measured during post-operative days 1-3. Further safety and efficacy parameters include, e.g., combined mortality/major post-operative complications until day 90, renal function, coagulation, inflammation, hemodynamic variables, hospital length of stay, major post-operative complications, and 28-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality. DISCUSSION: The study will provide important information on the long-term safety and efficacy of HES 130/0.4 when administered according to the approved European product information. The results will be relevant for volume therapy of surgical patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2016-002162-30. ClinicalTrials.govNCT03278548 BioMed Central 2022-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8862305/ /pubmed/35193648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06058-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Buhre, Wolfgang de Korte-de Boer, Dianne de Abreu, Marcelo Gama Scheeren, Thomas Gruenewald, Matthias Hoeft, Andreas Spahn, Donat R. Zarbock, Alexander Daamen, Sylvia Westphal, Martin Brauer, Ute Dehnhardt, Tamara Schmier, Sonja Baron, Jean-Francois De Hert, Stefan Gavranović, Željka Cholley, Bernard Vymazal, Tomas Szczeklik, Wojciech Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar Soro Domingo, Marina Blanca Grintescu, Ioana Jankovic, Radmilo Belda, Javier Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sOlution versus an Electrolyte solutioN In patients undergoing eleCtive abdominal Surgery: study protocol for the PHOENICS study |
title | Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sOlution versus an Electrolyte solutioN In patients undergoing eleCtive abdominal Surgery: study protocol for the PHOENICS study |
title_full | Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sOlution versus an Electrolyte solutioN In patients undergoing eleCtive abdominal Surgery: study protocol for the PHOENICS study |
title_fullStr | Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sOlution versus an Electrolyte solutioN In patients undergoing eleCtive abdominal Surgery: study protocol for the PHOENICS study |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sOlution versus an Electrolyte solutioN In patients undergoing eleCtive abdominal Surgery: study protocol for the PHOENICS study |
title_short | Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sOlution versus an Electrolyte solutioN In patients undergoing eleCtive abdominal Surgery: study protocol for the PHOENICS study |
title_sort | prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% hydroxyethyl starch (hes) solution versus an electrolyte solution in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery: study protocol for the phoenics study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06058-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buhrewolfgang prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT dekortedeboerdianne prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT deabreumarcelogama prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT scheerenthomas prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT gruenewaldmatthias prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT hoeftandreas prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT spahndonatr prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT zarbockalexander prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT daamensylvia prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT westphalmartin prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT brauerute prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT dehnhardttamara prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT schmiersonja prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT baronjeanfrancois prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT dehertstefan prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT gavranoviczeljka prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT cholleybernard prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT vymazaltomas prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT szczeklikwojciech prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT bornemanncimentihelmar prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT sorodomingomarinablanca prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT grintescuioana prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT jankovicradmilo prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy AT beldajavier prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy |