Cargando…

Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sOlution versus an Electrolyte solutioN In patients undergoing eleCtive abdominal Surgery: study protocol for the PHOENICS study

BACKGROUND: Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions are used for volume therapy to treat hypovolemia due to acute blood loss and to maintain hemodynamic stability. This study was requested by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to provide more evidence on the long-term safety and efficacy of HES solutio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buhre, Wolfgang, de Korte-de Boer, Dianne, de Abreu, Marcelo Gama, Scheeren, Thomas, Gruenewald, Matthias, Hoeft, Andreas, Spahn, Donat R., Zarbock, Alexander, Daamen, Sylvia, Westphal, Martin, Brauer, Ute, Dehnhardt, Tamara, Schmier, Sonja, Baron, Jean-Francois, De Hert, Stefan, Gavranović, Željka, Cholley, Bernard, Vymazal, Tomas, Szczeklik, Wojciech, Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar, Soro Domingo, Marina Blanca, Grintescu, Ioana, Jankovic, Radmilo, Belda, Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06058-6
_version_ 1784655029847719936
author Buhre, Wolfgang
de Korte-de Boer, Dianne
de Abreu, Marcelo Gama
Scheeren, Thomas
Gruenewald, Matthias
Hoeft, Andreas
Spahn, Donat R.
Zarbock, Alexander
Daamen, Sylvia
Westphal, Martin
Brauer, Ute
Dehnhardt, Tamara
Schmier, Sonja
Baron, Jean-Francois
De Hert, Stefan
Gavranović, Željka
Cholley, Bernard
Vymazal, Tomas
Szczeklik, Wojciech
Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar
Soro Domingo, Marina Blanca
Grintescu, Ioana
Jankovic, Radmilo
Belda, Javier
author_facet Buhre, Wolfgang
de Korte-de Boer, Dianne
de Abreu, Marcelo Gama
Scheeren, Thomas
Gruenewald, Matthias
Hoeft, Andreas
Spahn, Donat R.
Zarbock, Alexander
Daamen, Sylvia
Westphal, Martin
Brauer, Ute
Dehnhardt, Tamara
Schmier, Sonja
Baron, Jean-Francois
De Hert, Stefan
Gavranović, Željka
Cholley, Bernard
Vymazal, Tomas
Szczeklik, Wojciech
Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar
Soro Domingo, Marina Blanca
Grintescu, Ioana
Jankovic, Radmilo
Belda, Javier
author_sort Buhre, Wolfgang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions are used for volume therapy to treat hypovolemia due to acute blood loss and to maintain hemodynamic stability. This study was requested by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to provide more evidence on the long-term safety and efficacy of HES solutions in the perioperative setting. METHODS: PHOENICS is a randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational phase IV (IIIb) study with two parallel groups to investigate non-inferiority regarding the safety of a 6% HES 130 solution (Volulyte 6%, Fresenius Kabi, Germany) compared with a crystalloid solution (Ionolyte, Fresenius Kabi, Germany) for infusion in patients with acute blood loss during elective abdominal surgery. A total of 2280 eligible patients (male and female patients willing to participate, with expected blood loss ≥ 500 ml, aged > 40 and ≤ 85 years, and ASA Physical status II–III) are randomly assigned to receive either HES or crystalloid solution for the treatment of hypovolemia due to surgery-induced acute blood loss in hospitals in up to 11 European countries. The dosing of investigational products (IP) is individualized to patients’ volume needs and guided by a volume algorithm. Patients are treated with IP for maximally 24 h or until the maximum daily dose of 30 ml/kg body weight is reached. The primary endpoint is the treatment group mean difference in the change from the pre-operative baseline value in cystatin-C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), to the eGFR value calculated from the highest cystatin-C level measured during post-operative days 1-3. Further safety and efficacy parameters include, e.g., combined mortality/major post-operative complications until day 90, renal function, coagulation, inflammation, hemodynamic variables, hospital length of stay, major post-operative complications, and 28-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality. DISCUSSION: The study will provide important information on the long-term safety and efficacy of HES 130/0.4 when administered according to the approved European product information. The results will be relevant for volume therapy of surgical patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2016-002162-30. ClinicalTrials.govNCT03278548
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8862305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88623052022-02-23 Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sOlution versus an Electrolyte solutioN In patients undergoing eleCtive abdominal Surgery: study protocol for the PHOENICS study Buhre, Wolfgang de Korte-de Boer, Dianne de Abreu, Marcelo Gama Scheeren, Thomas Gruenewald, Matthias Hoeft, Andreas Spahn, Donat R. Zarbock, Alexander Daamen, Sylvia Westphal, Martin Brauer, Ute Dehnhardt, Tamara Schmier, Sonja Baron, Jean-Francois De Hert, Stefan Gavranović, Željka Cholley, Bernard Vymazal, Tomas Szczeklik, Wojciech Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar Soro Domingo, Marina Blanca Grintescu, Ioana Jankovic, Radmilo Belda, Javier Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions are used for volume therapy to treat hypovolemia due to acute blood loss and to maintain hemodynamic stability. This study was requested by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to provide more evidence on the long-term safety and efficacy of HES solutions in the perioperative setting. METHODS: PHOENICS is a randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational phase IV (IIIb) study with two parallel groups to investigate non-inferiority regarding the safety of a 6% HES 130 solution (Volulyte 6%, Fresenius Kabi, Germany) compared with a crystalloid solution (Ionolyte, Fresenius Kabi, Germany) for infusion in patients with acute blood loss during elective abdominal surgery. A total of 2280 eligible patients (male and female patients willing to participate, with expected blood loss ≥ 500 ml, aged > 40 and ≤ 85 years, and ASA Physical status II–III) are randomly assigned to receive either HES or crystalloid solution for the treatment of hypovolemia due to surgery-induced acute blood loss in hospitals in up to 11 European countries. The dosing of investigational products (IP) is individualized to patients’ volume needs and guided by a volume algorithm. Patients are treated with IP for maximally 24 h or until the maximum daily dose of 30 ml/kg body weight is reached. The primary endpoint is the treatment group mean difference in the change from the pre-operative baseline value in cystatin-C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), to the eGFR value calculated from the highest cystatin-C level measured during post-operative days 1-3. Further safety and efficacy parameters include, e.g., combined mortality/major post-operative complications until day 90, renal function, coagulation, inflammation, hemodynamic variables, hospital length of stay, major post-operative complications, and 28-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality. DISCUSSION: The study will provide important information on the long-term safety and efficacy of HES 130/0.4 when administered according to the approved European product information. The results will be relevant for volume therapy of surgical patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2016-002162-30. ClinicalTrials.govNCT03278548 BioMed Central 2022-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8862305/ /pubmed/35193648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06058-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Buhre, Wolfgang
de Korte-de Boer, Dianne
de Abreu, Marcelo Gama
Scheeren, Thomas
Gruenewald, Matthias
Hoeft, Andreas
Spahn, Donat R.
Zarbock, Alexander
Daamen, Sylvia
Westphal, Martin
Brauer, Ute
Dehnhardt, Tamara
Schmier, Sonja
Baron, Jean-Francois
De Hert, Stefan
Gavranović, Željka
Cholley, Bernard
Vymazal, Tomas
Szczeklik, Wojciech
Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar
Soro Domingo, Marina Blanca
Grintescu, Ioana
Jankovic, Radmilo
Belda, Javier
Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sOlution versus an Electrolyte solutioN In patients undergoing eleCtive abdominal Surgery: study protocol for the PHOENICS study
title Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sOlution versus an Electrolyte solutioN In patients undergoing eleCtive abdominal Surgery: study protocol for the PHOENICS study
title_full Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sOlution versus an Electrolyte solutioN In patients undergoing eleCtive abdominal Surgery: study protocol for the PHOENICS study
title_fullStr Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sOlution versus an Electrolyte solutioN In patients undergoing eleCtive abdominal Surgery: study protocol for the PHOENICS study
title_full_unstemmed Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sOlution versus an Electrolyte solutioN In patients undergoing eleCtive abdominal Surgery: study protocol for the PHOENICS study
title_short Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sOlution versus an Electrolyte solutioN In patients undergoing eleCtive abdominal Surgery: study protocol for the PHOENICS study
title_sort prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% hydroxyethyl starch (hes) solution versus an electrolyte solution in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery: study protocol for the phoenics study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06058-6
work_keys_str_mv AT buhrewolfgang prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT dekortedeboerdianne prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT deabreumarcelogama prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT scheerenthomas prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT gruenewaldmatthias prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT hoeftandreas prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT spahndonatr prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT zarbockalexander prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT daamensylvia prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT westphalmartin prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT brauerute prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT dehnhardttamara prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT schmiersonja prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT baronjeanfrancois prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT dehertstefan prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT gavranoviczeljka prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT cholleybernard prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT vymazaltomas prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT szczeklikwojciech prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT bornemanncimentihelmar prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT sorodomingomarinablanca prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT grintescuioana prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT jankovicradmilo prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy
AT beldajavier prospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentermultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyof6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutioninpatientsundergoingelectiveabdominalsurgerystudyprotocolforthephoenicsstudy