Cargando…
Induction of labour: creation of a classification of Grenoble allowing an assessment of the evaluation of practices
BACKGROUND: Induction of labour, a very common obstetric procedure, affects about one in five pregnant women in most developed countries. Induction of labour is medically indicated, is subject to risks and additional costs, and is often poorly experienced by patients. The practices concerning induct...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35189831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04487-4 |
_version_ | 1784655037123788800 |
---|---|
author | Vanneaux, Manon Forey, Pierre-Louis Equy, Véronique Hoffmann, Pascale Riethmuller, Didier |
author_facet | Vanneaux, Manon Forey, Pierre-Louis Equy, Véronique Hoffmann, Pascale Riethmuller, Didier |
author_sort | Vanneaux, Manon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Induction of labour, a very common obstetric procedure, affects about one in five pregnant women in most developed countries. Induction of labour is medically indicated, is subject to risks and additional costs, and is often poorly experienced by patients. The practices concerning induction vary widely from centre to centre and therefore need to be evaluated. Our aim was to develop a tool for evaluating induction of labour which would facilitate geographical and temporal comparisons. METHODS: We have created a classification based on the principles of the internationally known Robson classification. It should be simple, robust, reproducible and require readily available data in each file. The groups are fully inclusive and mutually exclusive. This classification has been validated by a Delphi method. RESULTS: Our classification includes 8 clinically relevant groups according to 5 obstetrical criteria. In order to classify each patient into a group, a simple system based on a maximum of 7 successive questions (from 1 to 7 questions) is used. Our classification has been validated by 13 national experts with satisfactory overall approval. CONCLUSIONS: With a view to improving the quality of care, our Grenoble classification would allow a standardization of the evaluation of practices of the induction of labour over time in the same maternity hospital. It would also allow the comparison of practices within different maternity hospitals in a network, a country or even different countries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8862342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88623422022-02-23 Induction of labour: creation of a classification of Grenoble allowing an assessment of the evaluation of practices Vanneaux, Manon Forey, Pierre-Louis Equy, Véronique Hoffmann, Pascale Riethmuller, Didier BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Induction of labour, a very common obstetric procedure, affects about one in five pregnant women in most developed countries. Induction of labour is medically indicated, is subject to risks and additional costs, and is often poorly experienced by patients. The practices concerning induction vary widely from centre to centre and therefore need to be evaluated. Our aim was to develop a tool for evaluating induction of labour which would facilitate geographical and temporal comparisons. METHODS: We have created a classification based on the principles of the internationally known Robson classification. It should be simple, robust, reproducible and require readily available data in each file. The groups are fully inclusive and mutually exclusive. This classification has been validated by a Delphi method. RESULTS: Our classification includes 8 clinically relevant groups according to 5 obstetrical criteria. In order to classify each patient into a group, a simple system based on a maximum of 7 successive questions (from 1 to 7 questions) is used. Our classification has been validated by 13 national experts with satisfactory overall approval. CONCLUSIONS: With a view to improving the quality of care, our Grenoble classification would allow a standardization of the evaluation of practices of the induction of labour over time in the same maternity hospital. It would also allow the comparison of practices within different maternity hospitals in a network, a country or even different countries. BioMed Central 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8862342/ /pubmed/35189831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04487-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Vanneaux, Manon Forey, Pierre-Louis Equy, Véronique Hoffmann, Pascale Riethmuller, Didier Induction of labour: creation of a classification of Grenoble allowing an assessment of the evaluation of practices |
title | Induction of labour: creation of a classification of Grenoble allowing an assessment of the evaluation of practices |
title_full | Induction of labour: creation of a classification of Grenoble allowing an assessment of the evaluation of practices |
title_fullStr | Induction of labour: creation of a classification of Grenoble allowing an assessment of the evaluation of practices |
title_full_unstemmed | Induction of labour: creation of a classification of Grenoble allowing an assessment of the evaluation of practices |
title_short | Induction of labour: creation of a classification of Grenoble allowing an assessment of the evaluation of practices |
title_sort | induction of labour: creation of a classification of grenoble allowing an assessment of the evaluation of practices |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35189831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04487-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanneauxmanon inductionoflabourcreationofaclassificationofgrenobleallowinganassessmentoftheevaluationofpractices AT foreypierrelouis inductionoflabourcreationofaclassificationofgrenobleallowinganassessmentoftheevaluationofpractices AT equyveronique inductionoflabourcreationofaclassificationofgrenobleallowinganassessmentoftheevaluationofpractices AT hoffmannpascale inductionoflabourcreationofaclassificationofgrenobleallowinganassessmentoftheevaluationofpractices AT riethmullerdidier inductionoflabourcreationofaclassificationofgrenobleallowinganassessmentoftheevaluationofpractices |