Cargando…
The value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: The role of tumor deposits (TDs) in TNM staging of colorectal cancer is controversial, especially the relationship with distant metastasis. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the effect of TDs on the survival of colorectal cancer and the occurrence of distant metastasis and to determ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35189906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02501-9 |
_version_ | 1784655043349184512 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Wenhao Zeng, Shun Zhang, Xianbin Liu, Peng Qiu, Tong Li, Shulin Gong, Peng |
author_facet | Wu, Wenhao Zeng, Shun Zhang, Xianbin Liu, Peng Qiu, Tong Li, Shulin Gong, Peng |
author_sort | Wu, Wenhao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The role of tumor deposits (TDs) in TNM staging of colorectal cancer is controversial, especially the relationship with distant metastasis. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the effect of TDs on the survival of colorectal cancer and the occurrence of distant metastasis and to determine whether TDs (+) patients behaved similarly to stage IV patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of CRC patients from two large independent cohorts from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (n = 58775) and the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (n = 742). RESULTS: Univariate logistic analyses revealed that TDs are an independent predictor of liver metastasis [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 5.738; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.560–9.248] in the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University’s patients. Meanwhile, TDs are also an independent predictor of isolated organ metastasis [p <0.001; odds ratio (OR): 3.028; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.414–3.79; multiple organ metastases [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 4.778; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.109–5.556]; isolated liver metastasis [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 4.395; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.099–4.713] and isolated lung metastasis [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 5.738; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.560–9.248] in the SEER database. Multivariate analyses suggested TDs are an independent poor prognostic factor for distant metastasis (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results have shown that compared with patients with negative TDs, CRC patients with positive TDs are more likely to develop distant metastasis. Patients categorized as T4aN2bM0 TDs (+) and T4bN2M0 TDs (+) have a similar prognosis as those with stage IV, and hence these patients should be classified as stage IV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02501-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8862372 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88623722022-02-23 The value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study Wu, Wenhao Zeng, Shun Zhang, Xianbin Liu, Peng Qiu, Tong Li, Shulin Gong, Peng World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The role of tumor deposits (TDs) in TNM staging of colorectal cancer is controversial, especially the relationship with distant metastasis. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the effect of TDs on the survival of colorectal cancer and the occurrence of distant metastasis and to determine whether TDs (+) patients behaved similarly to stage IV patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of CRC patients from two large independent cohorts from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (n = 58775) and the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (n = 742). RESULTS: Univariate logistic analyses revealed that TDs are an independent predictor of liver metastasis [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 5.738; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.560–9.248] in the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University’s patients. Meanwhile, TDs are also an independent predictor of isolated organ metastasis [p <0.001; odds ratio (OR): 3.028; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.414–3.79; multiple organ metastases [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 4.778; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.109–5.556]; isolated liver metastasis [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 4.395; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.099–4.713] and isolated lung metastasis [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 5.738; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.560–9.248] in the SEER database. Multivariate analyses suggested TDs are an independent poor prognostic factor for distant metastasis (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results have shown that compared with patients with negative TDs, CRC patients with positive TDs are more likely to develop distant metastasis. Patients categorized as T4aN2bM0 TDs (+) and T4bN2M0 TDs (+) have a similar prognosis as those with stage IV, and hence these patients should be classified as stage IV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02501-9. BioMed Central 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8862372/ /pubmed/35189906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02501-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wu, Wenhao Zeng, Shun Zhang, Xianbin Liu, Peng Qiu, Tong Li, Shulin Gong, Peng The value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study |
title | The value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study |
title_full | The value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | The value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | The value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study |
title_short | The value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35189906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02501-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuwenhao thevalueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy AT zengshun thevalueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy AT zhangxianbin thevalueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy AT liupeng thevalueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy AT qiutong thevalueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy AT lishulin thevalueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy AT gongpeng thevalueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy AT wuwenhao valueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy AT zengshun valueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy AT zhangxianbin valueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy AT liupeng valueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy AT qiutong valueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy AT lishulin valueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy AT gongpeng valueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy |