Cargando…

The value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The role of tumor deposits (TDs) in TNM staging of colorectal cancer is controversial, especially the relationship with distant metastasis. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the effect of TDs on the survival of colorectal cancer and the occurrence of distant metastasis and to determ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Wenhao, Zeng, Shun, Zhang, Xianbin, Liu, Peng, Qiu, Tong, Li, Shulin, Gong, Peng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35189906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02501-9
_version_ 1784655043349184512
author Wu, Wenhao
Zeng, Shun
Zhang, Xianbin
Liu, Peng
Qiu, Tong
Li, Shulin
Gong, Peng
author_facet Wu, Wenhao
Zeng, Shun
Zhang, Xianbin
Liu, Peng
Qiu, Tong
Li, Shulin
Gong, Peng
author_sort Wu, Wenhao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The role of tumor deposits (TDs) in TNM staging of colorectal cancer is controversial, especially the relationship with distant metastasis. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the effect of TDs on the survival of colorectal cancer and the occurrence of distant metastasis and to determine whether TDs (+) patients behaved similarly to stage IV patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of CRC patients from two large independent cohorts from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (n = 58775) and the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (n = 742). RESULTS: Univariate logistic analyses revealed that TDs are an independent predictor of liver metastasis [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 5.738; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.560–9.248] in the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University’s patients. Meanwhile, TDs are also an independent predictor of isolated organ metastasis [p <0.001; odds ratio (OR): 3.028; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.414–3.79; multiple organ metastases [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 4.778; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.109–5.556]; isolated liver metastasis [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 4.395; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.099–4.713] and isolated lung metastasis [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 5.738; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.560–9.248] in the SEER database. Multivariate analyses suggested TDs are an independent poor prognostic factor for distant metastasis (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results have shown that compared with patients with negative TDs, CRC patients with positive TDs are more likely to develop distant metastasis. Patients categorized as T4aN2bM0 TDs (+) and T4bN2M0 TDs (+) have a similar prognosis as those with stage IV, and hence these patients should be classified as stage IV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02501-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8862372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88623722022-02-23 The value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study Wu, Wenhao Zeng, Shun Zhang, Xianbin Liu, Peng Qiu, Tong Li, Shulin Gong, Peng World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The role of tumor deposits (TDs) in TNM staging of colorectal cancer is controversial, especially the relationship with distant metastasis. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the effect of TDs on the survival of colorectal cancer and the occurrence of distant metastasis and to determine whether TDs (+) patients behaved similarly to stage IV patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of CRC patients from two large independent cohorts from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (n = 58775) and the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (n = 742). RESULTS: Univariate logistic analyses revealed that TDs are an independent predictor of liver metastasis [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 5.738; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.560–9.248] in the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University’s patients. Meanwhile, TDs are also an independent predictor of isolated organ metastasis [p <0.001; odds ratio (OR): 3.028; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.414–3.79; multiple organ metastases [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 4.778; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.109–5.556]; isolated liver metastasis [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 4.395; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.099–4.713] and isolated lung metastasis [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 5.738; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.560–9.248] in the SEER database. Multivariate analyses suggested TDs are an independent poor prognostic factor for distant metastasis (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results have shown that compared with patients with negative TDs, CRC patients with positive TDs are more likely to develop distant metastasis. Patients categorized as T4aN2bM0 TDs (+) and T4bN2M0 TDs (+) have a similar prognosis as those with stage IV, and hence these patients should be classified as stage IV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02501-9. BioMed Central 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8862372/ /pubmed/35189906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02501-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wu, Wenhao
Zeng, Shun
Zhang, Xianbin
Liu, Peng
Qiu, Tong
Li, Shulin
Gong, Peng
The value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study
title The value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study
title_full The value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr The value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study
title_short The value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study
title_sort value of tumor deposits in evaluating colorectal cancer survival and metastasis: a population-based retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35189906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02501-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wuwenhao thevalueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zengshun thevalueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhangxianbin thevalueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liupeng thevalueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT qiutong thevalueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lishulin thevalueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT gongpeng thevalueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wuwenhao valueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zengshun valueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhangxianbin valueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liupeng valueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT qiutong valueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lishulin valueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT gongpeng valueoftumordepositsinevaluatingcolorectalcancersurvivalandmetastasisapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy