Cargando…

Sex-based differences in left ventricular remodeling in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a multi-modality study

BACKGROUND: Significant aortic regurgitation (AR) leads to left ventricular (LV) remodeling; however, little data exist regarding sex-based differences in LV remodeling in this setting. We sought to compare LV remodeling and AR severity, assessed by echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic reson...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tower-Rader, Albree, Mathias, Isadora Sande, Obuchowski, Nancy A., Kocyigit, Duygu, Kumar, Yash, Donnellan, Eoin, Bolen, Michael, Phelan, Dermot, Flamm, Scott, Griffin, Brian, Cho, Leslie, Svensson, Lars G., Pettersson, Gosta, Popovic, Zoran, Kwon, Deborah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-022-00845-5
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Significant aortic regurgitation (AR) leads to left ventricular (LV) remodeling; however, little data exist regarding sex-based differences in LV remodeling in this setting. We sought to compare LV remodeling and AR severity, assessed by echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), to discern sex-based differences. METHODS: Patients with ≥ moderate chronic AR by echocardiography who underwent CMR within 90 days between December 2005 and October 2015 were included. Nonlinear regression models were built to assess the effect of AR regurgitant fraction (RF) on LV remodeling. A generalized linear model and Bland Altman analyses were constructed to evaluate differences between CMR and echocardiography. Referral for surgical intervention based on symptoms and LV remodeling was evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 243 patients (48.3 ± 16.6 years, 58 (24%) female), 119 (49%) underwent surgical intervention with a primary indication of severe AR, 97 (82%) men, 22 (18%) women. Significant sex differences in LV remodeling emerged on CMR. Women demonstrated significantly smaller LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) (96.8 ml/m(2) vs 125.6 ml/m(2), p < 0.001), LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) (41.1 vs 54.5 ml/m(2), p < 0.001), blunted LV dilation in the setting of increasing AR severity (LVEDVI p value < 0.001, LVESVI p value 0.011), and LV length indexed (8.32 vs 9.69 cm, p < 0.001). On Bland Altman analysis, a significant interaction with sex and LV diameters was evident, demonstrating a significant increase in the difference between CMR and echocardiography measurements as the LV enlarged in women: LVEDVI (p = 0.006), LVESVI (p < 0.001), such that echocardiographic measurements increasingly underestimated LV diameters in women as the LV enlarged. LV length was higher for males with a linear effect from RF (p < 0.001), with LV length increasing at a higher rate with increasing RF for males compared to females (two-way interaction with sex p = 0.005). Sphericity volume index was higher for men after adjusting for a relative wall thickness (p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: CMR assessment of chronic AR revealed significant sex differences in LV remodeling and significant echocardiographic underestimation of LV dilation, particularly in women. Defining optimal sex-based CMR thresholds for surgical referral should be further developed. Trial registration: NA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12968-022-00845-5.