Cargando…

Sex-based differences in left ventricular remodeling in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a multi-modality study

BACKGROUND: Significant aortic regurgitation (AR) leads to left ventricular (LV) remodeling; however, little data exist regarding sex-based differences in LV remodeling in this setting. We sought to compare LV remodeling and AR severity, assessed by echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic reson...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tower-Rader, Albree, Mathias, Isadora Sande, Obuchowski, Nancy A., Kocyigit, Duygu, Kumar, Yash, Donnellan, Eoin, Bolen, Michael, Phelan, Dermot, Flamm, Scott, Griffin, Brian, Cho, Leslie, Svensson, Lars G., Pettersson, Gosta, Popovic, Zoran, Kwon, Deborah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-022-00845-5
_version_ 1784655046995083264
author Tower-Rader, Albree
Mathias, Isadora Sande
Obuchowski, Nancy A.
Kocyigit, Duygu
Kumar, Yash
Donnellan, Eoin
Bolen, Michael
Phelan, Dermot
Flamm, Scott
Griffin, Brian
Cho, Leslie
Svensson, Lars G.
Pettersson, Gosta
Popovic, Zoran
Kwon, Deborah
author_facet Tower-Rader, Albree
Mathias, Isadora Sande
Obuchowski, Nancy A.
Kocyigit, Duygu
Kumar, Yash
Donnellan, Eoin
Bolen, Michael
Phelan, Dermot
Flamm, Scott
Griffin, Brian
Cho, Leslie
Svensson, Lars G.
Pettersson, Gosta
Popovic, Zoran
Kwon, Deborah
author_sort Tower-Rader, Albree
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Significant aortic regurgitation (AR) leads to left ventricular (LV) remodeling; however, little data exist regarding sex-based differences in LV remodeling in this setting. We sought to compare LV remodeling and AR severity, assessed by echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), to discern sex-based differences. METHODS: Patients with ≥ moderate chronic AR by echocardiography who underwent CMR within 90 days between December 2005 and October 2015 were included. Nonlinear regression models were built to assess the effect of AR regurgitant fraction (RF) on LV remodeling. A generalized linear model and Bland Altman analyses were constructed to evaluate differences between CMR and echocardiography. Referral for surgical intervention based on symptoms and LV remodeling was evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 243 patients (48.3 ± 16.6 years, 58 (24%) female), 119 (49%) underwent surgical intervention with a primary indication of severe AR, 97 (82%) men, 22 (18%) women. Significant sex differences in LV remodeling emerged on CMR. Women demonstrated significantly smaller LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) (96.8 ml/m(2) vs 125.6 ml/m(2), p < 0.001), LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) (41.1 vs 54.5 ml/m(2), p < 0.001), blunted LV dilation in the setting of increasing AR severity (LVEDVI p value < 0.001, LVESVI p value 0.011), and LV length indexed (8.32 vs 9.69 cm, p < 0.001). On Bland Altman analysis, a significant interaction with sex and LV diameters was evident, demonstrating a significant increase in the difference between CMR and echocardiography measurements as the LV enlarged in women: LVEDVI (p = 0.006), LVESVI (p < 0.001), such that echocardiographic measurements increasingly underestimated LV diameters in women as the LV enlarged. LV length was higher for males with a linear effect from RF (p < 0.001), with LV length increasing at a higher rate with increasing RF for males compared to females (two-way interaction with sex p = 0.005). Sphericity volume index was higher for men after adjusting for a relative wall thickness (p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: CMR assessment of chronic AR revealed significant sex differences in LV remodeling and significant echocardiographic underestimation of LV dilation, particularly in women. Defining optimal sex-based CMR thresholds for surgical referral should be further developed. Trial registration: NA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12968-022-00845-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8862390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88623902022-02-23 Sex-based differences in left ventricular remodeling in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a multi-modality study Tower-Rader, Albree Mathias, Isadora Sande Obuchowski, Nancy A. Kocyigit, Duygu Kumar, Yash Donnellan, Eoin Bolen, Michael Phelan, Dermot Flamm, Scott Griffin, Brian Cho, Leslie Svensson, Lars G. Pettersson, Gosta Popovic, Zoran Kwon, Deborah J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Significant aortic regurgitation (AR) leads to left ventricular (LV) remodeling; however, little data exist regarding sex-based differences in LV remodeling in this setting. We sought to compare LV remodeling and AR severity, assessed by echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), to discern sex-based differences. METHODS: Patients with ≥ moderate chronic AR by echocardiography who underwent CMR within 90 days between December 2005 and October 2015 were included. Nonlinear regression models were built to assess the effect of AR regurgitant fraction (RF) on LV remodeling. A generalized linear model and Bland Altman analyses were constructed to evaluate differences between CMR and echocardiography. Referral for surgical intervention based on symptoms and LV remodeling was evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 243 patients (48.3 ± 16.6 years, 58 (24%) female), 119 (49%) underwent surgical intervention with a primary indication of severe AR, 97 (82%) men, 22 (18%) women. Significant sex differences in LV remodeling emerged on CMR. Women demonstrated significantly smaller LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) (96.8 ml/m(2) vs 125.6 ml/m(2), p < 0.001), LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) (41.1 vs 54.5 ml/m(2), p < 0.001), blunted LV dilation in the setting of increasing AR severity (LVEDVI p value < 0.001, LVESVI p value 0.011), and LV length indexed (8.32 vs 9.69 cm, p < 0.001). On Bland Altman analysis, a significant interaction with sex and LV diameters was evident, demonstrating a significant increase in the difference between CMR and echocardiography measurements as the LV enlarged in women: LVEDVI (p = 0.006), LVESVI (p < 0.001), such that echocardiographic measurements increasingly underestimated LV diameters in women as the LV enlarged. LV length was higher for males with a linear effect from RF (p < 0.001), with LV length increasing at a higher rate with increasing RF for males compared to females (two-way interaction with sex p = 0.005). Sphericity volume index was higher for men after adjusting for a relative wall thickness (p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: CMR assessment of chronic AR revealed significant sex differences in LV remodeling and significant echocardiographic underestimation of LV dilation, particularly in women. Defining optimal sex-based CMR thresholds for surgical referral should be further developed. Trial registration: NA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12968-022-00845-5. BioMed Central 2022-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8862390/ /pubmed/35193584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-022-00845-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tower-Rader, Albree
Mathias, Isadora Sande
Obuchowski, Nancy A.
Kocyigit, Duygu
Kumar, Yash
Donnellan, Eoin
Bolen, Michael
Phelan, Dermot
Flamm, Scott
Griffin, Brian
Cho, Leslie
Svensson, Lars G.
Pettersson, Gosta
Popovic, Zoran
Kwon, Deborah
Sex-based differences in left ventricular remodeling in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a multi-modality study
title Sex-based differences in left ventricular remodeling in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a multi-modality study
title_full Sex-based differences in left ventricular remodeling in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a multi-modality study
title_fullStr Sex-based differences in left ventricular remodeling in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a multi-modality study
title_full_unstemmed Sex-based differences in left ventricular remodeling in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a multi-modality study
title_short Sex-based differences in left ventricular remodeling in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a multi-modality study
title_sort sex-based differences in left ventricular remodeling in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a multi-modality study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-022-00845-5
work_keys_str_mv AT towerraderalbree sexbaseddifferencesinleftventricularremodelinginpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationamultimodalitystudy
AT mathiasisadorasande sexbaseddifferencesinleftventricularremodelinginpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationamultimodalitystudy
AT obuchowskinancya sexbaseddifferencesinleftventricularremodelinginpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationamultimodalitystudy
AT kocyigitduygu sexbaseddifferencesinleftventricularremodelinginpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationamultimodalitystudy
AT kumaryash sexbaseddifferencesinleftventricularremodelinginpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationamultimodalitystudy
AT donnellaneoin sexbaseddifferencesinleftventricularremodelinginpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationamultimodalitystudy
AT bolenmichael sexbaseddifferencesinleftventricularremodelinginpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationamultimodalitystudy
AT phelandermot sexbaseddifferencesinleftventricularremodelinginpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationamultimodalitystudy
AT flammscott sexbaseddifferencesinleftventricularremodelinginpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationamultimodalitystudy
AT griffinbrian sexbaseddifferencesinleftventricularremodelinginpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationamultimodalitystudy
AT choleslie sexbaseddifferencesinleftventricularremodelinginpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationamultimodalitystudy
AT svenssonlarsg sexbaseddifferencesinleftventricularremodelinginpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationamultimodalitystudy
AT petterssongosta sexbaseddifferencesinleftventricularremodelinginpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationamultimodalitystudy
AT popoviczoran sexbaseddifferencesinleftventricularremodelinginpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationamultimodalitystudy
AT kwondeborah sexbaseddifferencesinleftventricularremodelinginpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationamultimodalitystudy