Cargando…

Patient engagement partnerships in clinical trials (PEP-CT): protocol for the systematic development and testing of patient partner and investigator decision aids

INTRODUCTION: Building capacity to improve sex/gender knowledge and strengthen patient engagement in clinical trials requires training and support. The overall goal of this 2-year project is to refine, translate and evaluate two web-based open-access patient and investigator decision aids aimed to i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parry, Monica, Ceroni, Tina, Wells, David, Richards, Dawn P, Toupin-April, Karine, Ansari, Hafsa, Bjørnnes, Ann Kristin, Burnside, Heather, Cavallo, Sabrina, Day, Andrew, Ellis, Anne, Feldman, Debbie, Gilron, Ian, Najam, Adhiyat, Zulfiqar, Zoya, Marlin, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35190448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060267
_version_ 1784655062936584192
author Parry, Monica
Ceroni, Tina
Wells, David
Richards, Dawn P
Toupin-April, Karine
Ansari, Hafsa
Bjørnnes, Ann Kristin
Burnside, Heather
Cavallo, Sabrina
Day, Andrew
Ellis, Anne
Feldman, Debbie
Gilron, Ian
Najam, Adhiyat
Zulfiqar, Zoya
Marlin, Susan
author_facet Parry, Monica
Ceroni, Tina
Wells, David
Richards, Dawn P
Toupin-April, Karine
Ansari, Hafsa
Bjørnnes, Ann Kristin
Burnside, Heather
Cavallo, Sabrina
Day, Andrew
Ellis, Anne
Feldman, Debbie
Gilron, Ian
Najam, Adhiyat
Zulfiqar, Zoya
Marlin, Susan
author_sort Parry, Monica
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Building capacity to improve sex/gender knowledge and strengthen patient engagement in clinical trials requires training and support. The overall goal of this 2-year project is to refine, translate and evaluate two web-based open-access patient and investigator decision aids aimed to improve patient engagement partnerships in clinical trials. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Two decision aids were designed in Phase 1 of this programme of research and this protocol describes a subsequent sequential phased approach to refine/translate (Phase 2A) and conduct alpha/usability (Phase 2B) and beta/field (Phase 3) testing. Decision aid development is guided by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards, User-Centred Design, Ottawa Decision-Support Framework and the Ottawa Model of Research Use. We have integrated patient-oriented research methods by engaging patient partners across all phases of our programme of research. Decision aids will first be refined and then translated to French (Phase 2A). Eight iterative cycles of semistructured interviews with 40 participants (20 patient partners and 20 investigators) will be conducted to determine usability (Phase 2B). A pragmatic pre/post pilot study design will then be implemented for field/beta testing using another purposive sample of 80 English-speaking and French-speaking participants (40 patients and 40 investigators). The samples are purposive to ensure an equal representation of English-speaking and French-speaking participants and an equal representation of men and women. Since sex and/or gender differences in utilisation and effectiveness of decision aids have not been previously reported, Phase 3 outcomes will be reported for the total sample and separately for men and women. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been granted from the University of Toronto (41109, 28 September 2021). Informed consent will be obtained from participants. Dissemination will include co-authored publications, conference presentations, educational national public forums, fact sheets/newsletters, social media sharing and videos/webinars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8862478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88624782022-03-15 Patient engagement partnerships in clinical trials (PEP-CT): protocol for the systematic development and testing of patient partner and investigator decision aids Parry, Monica Ceroni, Tina Wells, David Richards, Dawn P Toupin-April, Karine Ansari, Hafsa Bjørnnes, Ann Kristin Burnside, Heather Cavallo, Sabrina Day, Andrew Ellis, Anne Feldman, Debbie Gilron, Ian Najam, Adhiyat Zulfiqar, Zoya Marlin, Susan BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine INTRODUCTION: Building capacity to improve sex/gender knowledge and strengthen patient engagement in clinical trials requires training and support. The overall goal of this 2-year project is to refine, translate and evaluate two web-based open-access patient and investigator decision aids aimed to improve patient engagement partnerships in clinical trials. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Two decision aids were designed in Phase 1 of this programme of research and this protocol describes a subsequent sequential phased approach to refine/translate (Phase 2A) and conduct alpha/usability (Phase 2B) and beta/field (Phase 3) testing. Decision aid development is guided by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards, User-Centred Design, Ottawa Decision-Support Framework and the Ottawa Model of Research Use. We have integrated patient-oriented research methods by engaging patient partners across all phases of our programme of research. Decision aids will first be refined and then translated to French (Phase 2A). Eight iterative cycles of semistructured interviews with 40 participants (20 patient partners and 20 investigators) will be conducted to determine usability (Phase 2B). A pragmatic pre/post pilot study design will then be implemented for field/beta testing using another purposive sample of 80 English-speaking and French-speaking participants (40 patients and 40 investigators). The samples are purposive to ensure an equal representation of English-speaking and French-speaking participants and an equal representation of men and women. Since sex and/or gender differences in utilisation and effectiveness of decision aids have not been previously reported, Phase 3 outcomes will be reported for the total sample and separately for men and women. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been granted from the University of Toronto (41109, 28 September 2021). Informed consent will be obtained from participants. Dissemination will include co-authored publications, conference presentations, educational national public forums, fact sheets/newsletters, social media sharing and videos/webinars. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8862478/ /pubmed/35190448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060267 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Parry, Monica
Ceroni, Tina
Wells, David
Richards, Dawn P
Toupin-April, Karine
Ansari, Hafsa
Bjørnnes, Ann Kristin
Burnside, Heather
Cavallo, Sabrina
Day, Andrew
Ellis, Anne
Feldman, Debbie
Gilron, Ian
Najam, Adhiyat
Zulfiqar, Zoya
Marlin, Susan
Patient engagement partnerships in clinical trials (PEP-CT): protocol for the systematic development and testing of patient partner and investigator decision aids
title Patient engagement partnerships in clinical trials (PEP-CT): protocol for the systematic development and testing of patient partner and investigator decision aids
title_full Patient engagement partnerships in clinical trials (PEP-CT): protocol for the systematic development and testing of patient partner and investigator decision aids
title_fullStr Patient engagement partnerships in clinical trials (PEP-CT): protocol for the systematic development and testing of patient partner and investigator decision aids
title_full_unstemmed Patient engagement partnerships in clinical trials (PEP-CT): protocol for the systematic development and testing of patient partner and investigator decision aids
title_short Patient engagement partnerships in clinical trials (PEP-CT): protocol for the systematic development and testing of patient partner and investigator decision aids
title_sort patient engagement partnerships in clinical trials (pep-ct): protocol for the systematic development and testing of patient partner and investigator decision aids
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35190448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060267
work_keys_str_mv AT parrymonica patientengagementpartnershipsinclinicaltrialspepctprotocolforthesystematicdevelopmentandtestingofpatientpartnerandinvestigatordecisionaids
AT ceronitina patientengagementpartnershipsinclinicaltrialspepctprotocolforthesystematicdevelopmentandtestingofpatientpartnerandinvestigatordecisionaids
AT wellsdavid patientengagementpartnershipsinclinicaltrialspepctprotocolforthesystematicdevelopmentandtestingofpatientpartnerandinvestigatordecisionaids
AT richardsdawnp patientengagementpartnershipsinclinicaltrialspepctprotocolforthesystematicdevelopmentandtestingofpatientpartnerandinvestigatordecisionaids
AT toupinaprilkarine patientengagementpartnershipsinclinicaltrialspepctprotocolforthesystematicdevelopmentandtestingofpatientpartnerandinvestigatordecisionaids
AT ansarihafsa patientengagementpartnershipsinclinicaltrialspepctprotocolforthesystematicdevelopmentandtestingofpatientpartnerandinvestigatordecisionaids
AT bjørnnesannkristin patientengagementpartnershipsinclinicaltrialspepctprotocolforthesystematicdevelopmentandtestingofpatientpartnerandinvestigatordecisionaids
AT burnsideheather patientengagementpartnershipsinclinicaltrialspepctprotocolforthesystematicdevelopmentandtestingofpatientpartnerandinvestigatordecisionaids
AT cavallosabrina patientengagementpartnershipsinclinicaltrialspepctprotocolforthesystematicdevelopmentandtestingofpatientpartnerandinvestigatordecisionaids
AT dayandrew patientengagementpartnershipsinclinicaltrialspepctprotocolforthesystematicdevelopmentandtestingofpatientpartnerandinvestigatordecisionaids
AT ellisanne patientengagementpartnershipsinclinicaltrialspepctprotocolforthesystematicdevelopmentandtestingofpatientpartnerandinvestigatordecisionaids
AT feldmandebbie patientengagementpartnershipsinclinicaltrialspepctprotocolforthesystematicdevelopmentandtestingofpatientpartnerandinvestigatordecisionaids
AT gilronian patientengagementpartnershipsinclinicaltrialspepctprotocolforthesystematicdevelopmentandtestingofpatientpartnerandinvestigatordecisionaids
AT najamadhiyat patientengagementpartnershipsinclinicaltrialspepctprotocolforthesystematicdevelopmentandtestingofpatientpartnerandinvestigatordecisionaids
AT zulfiqarzoya patientengagementpartnershipsinclinicaltrialspepctprotocolforthesystematicdevelopmentandtestingofpatientpartnerandinvestigatordecisionaids
AT marlinsusan patientengagementpartnershipsinclinicaltrialspepctprotocolforthesystematicdevelopmentandtestingofpatientpartnerandinvestigatordecisionaids