Cargando…

SMOC approach for total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to compare clinical outcomes among patients with valgus knees undergoing total knee arthroplasty via the medial parapatellar approach and the subvastus with minimal oblique cut approach. METHODS: A total of 232 patients (246 knees) undergoing total knee arthroplas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Tao, Liu, Yikai, Li, Chenkai, Zhang, Haining
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03002-x
_version_ 1784655067231551488
author Li, Tao
Liu, Yikai
Li, Chenkai
Zhang, Haining
author_facet Li, Tao
Liu, Yikai
Li, Chenkai
Zhang, Haining
author_sort Li, Tao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to compare clinical outcomes among patients with valgus knees undergoing total knee arthroplasty via the medial parapatellar approach and the subvastus with minimal oblique cut approach. METHODS: A total of 232 patients (246 knees) undergoing total knee arthroplasty between December 2014 and December 2016 were retrospectively included in the investigation. The study population consisted of 120 patients (128 knees; 32 men and 88 women) with a mean age of 62.43 ± 8.12 years treated via the medial parapatellar approach, and 112 patients (118 knees; 30 men and 82 women with a mean age of 63.15 ± 7.83 years) treated via the subvastus with minimal oblique cut approach. Nine preoperative parameters (number of patients, sex, age, body mass index, number of knees, valgus angle, visual analogue scale score, range of motion, Hospital for Special Surgery score), five perioperative parameters (operative time, amount of drainage, Visual analogue scale score at 24 h after the operation, time to straight leg raising, radiological alignment), and two postoperative parameters (range of motion, Hospital for Special Surgery score) were assessed at 1 day, 1 week, 6 weeks, 8 weeks and 1 year after the operation, along with postoperative complications. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the nine preoperative parameters between the two groups. The subvastus with minimal oblique cut group had a longer operative time, while the parapatellar approach group showed more drainage and a higher mean Visual analogue scale score. Compared to the medial parapatellar group, the subvastus with minimal oblique cut group had a shorter time to straight leg raising. There were no differences in radiological alignment between the two groups. The groups showed similar range of motion and Hospital for Special Surgery scores at 8 weeks and 1 year, but both were higher in the subvastus with minimal oblique cut group at 1 day, 1 week and 6 weeks. During postoperative follow-up, postoperative subluxation of the patella occurred in five cases in the medial parapatellar group. Neither group showed any instability, recurrent valgus deformity or radiographic loosening. CONCLUSION: The subvastus with minimal oblique cut approach provides excellent early recovery for total knee arthroplasty of valgus knees with no increase in complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8862505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88625052022-02-23 SMOC approach for total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees Li, Tao Liu, Yikai Li, Chenkai Zhang, Haining J Orthop Surg Res Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to compare clinical outcomes among patients with valgus knees undergoing total knee arthroplasty via the medial parapatellar approach and the subvastus with minimal oblique cut approach. METHODS: A total of 232 patients (246 knees) undergoing total knee arthroplasty between December 2014 and December 2016 were retrospectively included in the investigation. The study population consisted of 120 patients (128 knees; 32 men and 88 women) with a mean age of 62.43 ± 8.12 years treated via the medial parapatellar approach, and 112 patients (118 knees; 30 men and 82 women with a mean age of 63.15 ± 7.83 years) treated via the subvastus with minimal oblique cut approach. Nine preoperative parameters (number of patients, sex, age, body mass index, number of knees, valgus angle, visual analogue scale score, range of motion, Hospital for Special Surgery score), five perioperative parameters (operative time, amount of drainage, Visual analogue scale score at 24 h after the operation, time to straight leg raising, radiological alignment), and two postoperative parameters (range of motion, Hospital for Special Surgery score) were assessed at 1 day, 1 week, 6 weeks, 8 weeks and 1 year after the operation, along with postoperative complications. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the nine preoperative parameters between the two groups. The subvastus with minimal oblique cut group had a longer operative time, while the parapatellar approach group showed more drainage and a higher mean Visual analogue scale score. Compared to the medial parapatellar group, the subvastus with minimal oblique cut group had a shorter time to straight leg raising. There were no differences in radiological alignment between the two groups. The groups showed similar range of motion and Hospital for Special Surgery scores at 8 weeks and 1 year, but both were higher in the subvastus with minimal oblique cut group at 1 day, 1 week and 6 weeks. During postoperative follow-up, postoperative subluxation of the patella occurred in five cases in the medial parapatellar group. Neither group showed any instability, recurrent valgus deformity or radiographic loosening. CONCLUSION: The subvastus with minimal oblique cut approach provides excellent early recovery for total knee arthroplasty of valgus knees with no increase in complications. BioMed Central 2022-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8862505/ /pubmed/35193617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03002-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Tao
Liu, Yikai
Li, Chenkai
Zhang, Haining
SMOC approach for total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees
title SMOC approach for total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees
title_full SMOC approach for total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees
title_fullStr SMOC approach for total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees
title_full_unstemmed SMOC approach for total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees
title_short SMOC approach for total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees
title_sort smoc approach for total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03002-x
work_keys_str_mv AT litao smocapproachfortotalkneearthroplastyinvalgusknees
AT liuyikai smocapproachfortotalkneearthroplastyinvalgusknees
AT lichenkai smocapproachfortotalkneearthroplastyinvalgusknees
AT zhanghaining smocapproachfortotalkneearthroplastyinvalgusknees