Cargando…
Peer supported Open Dialogue in the National Health Service: implementing and evaluating a new approach to Mental Health Care
BACKGROUND: Open Dialogue is an internationally developing approach to mental health care based on collaboration between an individual and their family and social network. Our quest for better approaches to Mental Health Care with improved carer and service user experience led us to develop and test...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03731-7 |
_version_ | 1784655077677465600 |
---|---|
author | Kinane, Catherine Osborne, James Ishaq, Yasmin Colman, Marcus MacInnes, Douglas |
author_facet | Kinane, Catherine Osborne, James Ishaq, Yasmin Colman, Marcus MacInnes, Douglas |
author_sort | Kinane, Catherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Open Dialogue is an internationally developing approach to mental health care based on collaboration between an individual and their family and social network. Our quest for better approaches to Mental Health Care with improved carer and service user experience led us to develop and test a model of Peer Supported Open Dialogue (POD). There is no research currently looking at the implementation and effectiveness of a standalone POD team in the NHS so we evaluate its implementation, clinical outcomes and value to service users and their families. METHOD: A before-after design was used. 50 service users treated by the POD Team were recruited and participants from their family and wider social network. Service user self report questionnaires covering wellbeing, functioning, satisfaction were collected and one carer self report measure; at baseline, three and six months. A clinician reported measure was collected at baseline and six months. Clinicians perceptions of practice were collected following network meetings. RESULTS: 50 service users treated were recruited with a mean age of 35 years with slightly more males than females. Service users reported signficant improvements in wellbeing and functioning. There was a marked increase in perceived support by carers. Over half the meetings were attended by carers. The Community Mental Health Survey showed high satisfaction rates for service users including carer involvement. CONCLUSIONS: The study indicated it was possible to transform to deliver a clinically effective POD service in the NHS. This innovative approach provided continuity of care within the social network, with improved carer support and significant improvements in clinical outcomes and their experiences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (isrctn.com/ISRCTN36004039. Retrospectively registered 04/01/2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-022-03731-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8862567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88625672022-02-23 Peer supported Open Dialogue in the National Health Service: implementing and evaluating a new approach to Mental Health Care Kinane, Catherine Osborne, James Ishaq, Yasmin Colman, Marcus MacInnes, Douglas BMC Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: Open Dialogue is an internationally developing approach to mental health care based on collaboration between an individual and their family and social network. Our quest for better approaches to Mental Health Care with improved carer and service user experience led us to develop and test a model of Peer Supported Open Dialogue (POD). There is no research currently looking at the implementation and effectiveness of a standalone POD team in the NHS so we evaluate its implementation, clinical outcomes and value to service users and their families. METHOD: A before-after design was used. 50 service users treated by the POD Team were recruited and participants from their family and wider social network. Service user self report questionnaires covering wellbeing, functioning, satisfaction were collected and one carer self report measure; at baseline, three and six months. A clinician reported measure was collected at baseline and six months. Clinicians perceptions of practice were collected following network meetings. RESULTS: 50 service users treated were recruited with a mean age of 35 years with slightly more males than females. Service users reported signficant improvements in wellbeing and functioning. There was a marked increase in perceived support by carers. Over half the meetings were attended by carers. The Community Mental Health Survey showed high satisfaction rates for service users including carer involvement. CONCLUSIONS: The study indicated it was possible to transform to deliver a clinically effective POD service in the NHS. This innovative approach provided continuity of care within the social network, with improved carer support and significant improvements in clinical outcomes and their experiences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (isrctn.com/ISRCTN36004039. Retrospectively registered 04/01/2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-022-03731-7. BioMed Central 2022-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8862567/ /pubmed/35193551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03731-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kinane, Catherine Osborne, James Ishaq, Yasmin Colman, Marcus MacInnes, Douglas Peer supported Open Dialogue in the National Health Service: implementing and evaluating a new approach to Mental Health Care |
title | Peer supported Open Dialogue in the National Health Service: implementing and evaluating a new approach to Mental Health Care |
title_full | Peer supported Open Dialogue in the National Health Service: implementing and evaluating a new approach to Mental Health Care |
title_fullStr | Peer supported Open Dialogue in the National Health Service: implementing and evaluating a new approach to Mental Health Care |
title_full_unstemmed | Peer supported Open Dialogue in the National Health Service: implementing and evaluating a new approach to Mental Health Care |
title_short | Peer supported Open Dialogue in the National Health Service: implementing and evaluating a new approach to Mental Health Care |
title_sort | peer supported open dialogue in the national health service: implementing and evaluating a new approach to mental health care |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03731-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kinanecatherine peersupportedopendialogueinthenationalhealthserviceimplementingandevaluatinganewapproachtomentalhealthcare AT osbornejames peersupportedopendialogueinthenationalhealthserviceimplementingandevaluatinganewapproachtomentalhealthcare AT ishaqyasmin peersupportedopendialogueinthenationalhealthserviceimplementingandevaluatinganewapproachtomentalhealthcare AT colmanmarcus peersupportedopendialogueinthenationalhealthserviceimplementingandevaluatinganewapproachtomentalhealthcare AT macinnesdouglas peersupportedopendialogueinthenationalhealthserviceimplementingandevaluatinganewapproachtomentalhealthcare |