Cargando…

EUROPEAN EXPERT CONSENSUS ON IMPROVING PATIENT SELECTION FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF DISABLING SPASTICITY WITH INTRATHECAL BACLOFEN AND/OR BOTULINUM TOXIN TYPE A

OBJECTIVE: To develop an algorithm for the selection of adults with disabling spasticity for treatment with intrathecal baclofen (ITB) and/or botulinum toxin type A (BoNT A). METHODS: A European Advisory Board of 4 neurologists and 4 rehabilitation specialists performed a literature review on ITB an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: BIERING-SØRENSEN, Bo, STEVENSON, Valerie L., BENSMAIL, Djamel, GRABLJEVEC, Klemen, MARTÍNEZ MORENO, Mercedes, PUCKS-FAES, Elke, WISSEL, Joerg, ZAMPOLINI, Mauro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Foundation for Rehabilitation Information 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34608495
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2877
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To develop an algorithm for the selection of adults with disabling spasticity for treatment with intrathecal baclofen (ITB) and/or botulinum toxin type A (BoNT A). METHODS: A European Advisory Board of 4 neurologists and 4 rehabilitation specialists performed a literature review on ITB and BoNT A treatment for disabling spasticity. An online survey was sent to 125 physicians and 13 non-physician spasticity experts. Information on their current clinical practice and level of agreement on proposed selection criteria was used to inform algorithm design. Consensus was considered reached when ≥75% of respondents agreed or were neutral. RESULTS: A total of 79 experts from 17 countries completed the on-line survey (57%). Agreement was reached that patients with multi-segmental or generalized disabling spasticity refractory to oral drugs are the best candidates for ITB (96.1% consensus), while those with focal/segmental disabling spasticity are ideal candidates for BoNT A (98.7% consensus). In addition the following are good candidates for ITB (% consensus): bilateral disabling spasticity affecting lower limbs only (97.4%), bilateral (100%) or unilateral (90.9%) disabling spasticity affecting lower limbs and trunk, and unilateral or bilateral disabling spasticity affecting upper and lower extremities (96.1%). CONCLUSION: This algorithm will support the management of adult patients with disabling spasticity by aiding patient selection for ITB and/or BoNT A treatments.