Cargando…

Completeness of police reporting of traffic crashes in Nepal: Evaluation using a community crash recording system

OBJECTIVE: Accurate road crash reporting is essential for evaluating road safety interventions and plans. Under-reporting of road traffic crashes, injuries, and fatalities in police records has been widely described. The aim of this study was to apply and evaluate a community crash recording system,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khadka, Anish, Parkin, John, Pilkington, Paul, Joshi, Sunil Kumar, Mytton, Julie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35030051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2021.2012766
_version_ 1784655104920518656
author Khadka, Anish
Parkin, John
Pilkington, Paul
Joshi, Sunil Kumar
Mytton, Julie
author_facet Khadka, Anish
Parkin, John
Pilkington, Paul
Joshi, Sunil Kumar
Mytton, Julie
author_sort Khadka, Anish
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Accurate road crash reporting is essential for evaluating road safety interventions and plans. Under-reporting of road traffic crashes, injuries, and fatalities in police records has been widely described. The aim of this study was to apply and evaluate a community crash recording system, and assess the quality of the data in comparison with traffic police data in Nepal. METHODS: The crash data collection methodology involved recruiting Local Record Keepers working and living at locations known to be at a high risk of crashes. Six shopkeepers were recruited at three crash locations and trained to complete collision incident forms for crashes occurring over one year on the section of road visible from their premises. Manual traffic volume and pedestrian counts, and spot speed surveys were conducted. Data were compared with District police records for the same period and locations. RESULTS: Over 12 months, 110 crashes were recorded by the Local Record Keepers. Of these, 70 resulted in 145 injuries (5 fatalities, 62 severe, and 78 minor injuries), while 40 resulted only in property damage. Comparable police data recorded 23 crashes, of which 18 crashes resulted in 27 injuries (8 fatalities, 13 serious, and 6 minor injuries), and 5 crashes in property damage only. The difference in recording of fatal and serious injuries was statistically significant (χ(2)(1) = 19.94, p < 0.001). The police reporting rate was highest for fatalities (62.5%) but only 11.6% and 7.1% for property damage cases and minor injuries respectively, and 3.8% for single-vehicle crashes. Compared to the Local Record Keeper data, the overall police crash reporting rate was 19.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Local Record Keepers’ recording of road traffic crashes and casualties is feasible and provides a more complete record than routinely collected police data. The low reporting rate in the police records of minor injury, property damage, and single-vehicle crashes suggest significant underestimation and bias in the reporting of the actual burden of road traffic crashes. Local Record Keeper recording is a viable method for validating police reports.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8862739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88627392022-02-23 Completeness of police reporting of traffic crashes in Nepal: Evaluation using a community crash recording system Khadka, Anish Parkin, John Pilkington, Paul Joshi, Sunil Kumar Mytton, Julie Traffic Inj Prev Articles OBJECTIVE: Accurate road crash reporting is essential for evaluating road safety interventions and plans. Under-reporting of road traffic crashes, injuries, and fatalities in police records has been widely described. The aim of this study was to apply and evaluate a community crash recording system, and assess the quality of the data in comparison with traffic police data in Nepal. METHODS: The crash data collection methodology involved recruiting Local Record Keepers working and living at locations known to be at a high risk of crashes. Six shopkeepers were recruited at three crash locations and trained to complete collision incident forms for crashes occurring over one year on the section of road visible from their premises. Manual traffic volume and pedestrian counts, and spot speed surveys were conducted. Data were compared with District police records for the same period and locations. RESULTS: Over 12 months, 110 crashes were recorded by the Local Record Keepers. Of these, 70 resulted in 145 injuries (5 fatalities, 62 severe, and 78 minor injuries), while 40 resulted only in property damage. Comparable police data recorded 23 crashes, of which 18 crashes resulted in 27 injuries (8 fatalities, 13 serious, and 6 minor injuries), and 5 crashes in property damage only. The difference in recording of fatal and serious injuries was statistically significant (χ(2)(1) = 19.94, p < 0.001). The police reporting rate was highest for fatalities (62.5%) but only 11.6% and 7.1% for property damage cases and minor injuries respectively, and 3.8% for single-vehicle crashes. Compared to the Local Record Keeper data, the overall police crash reporting rate was 19.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Local Record Keepers’ recording of road traffic crashes and casualties is feasible and provides a more complete record than routinely collected police data. The low reporting rate in the police records of minor injury, property damage, and single-vehicle crashes suggest significant underestimation and bias in the reporting of the actual burden of road traffic crashes. Local Record Keeper recording is a viable method for validating police reports. Taylor & Francis 2022-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8862739/ /pubmed/35030051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2021.2012766 Text en © 2022 Nepal Injury Research Centre. Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Khadka, Anish
Parkin, John
Pilkington, Paul
Joshi, Sunil Kumar
Mytton, Julie
Completeness of police reporting of traffic crashes in Nepal: Evaluation using a community crash recording system
title Completeness of police reporting of traffic crashes in Nepal: Evaluation using a community crash recording system
title_full Completeness of police reporting of traffic crashes in Nepal: Evaluation using a community crash recording system
title_fullStr Completeness of police reporting of traffic crashes in Nepal: Evaluation using a community crash recording system
title_full_unstemmed Completeness of police reporting of traffic crashes in Nepal: Evaluation using a community crash recording system
title_short Completeness of police reporting of traffic crashes in Nepal: Evaluation using a community crash recording system
title_sort completeness of police reporting of traffic crashes in nepal: evaluation using a community crash recording system
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35030051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2021.2012766
work_keys_str_mv AT khadkaanish completenessofpolicereportingoftrafficcrashesinnepalevaluationusingacommunitycrashrecordingsystem
AT parkinjohn completenessofpolicereportingoftrafficcrashesinnepalevaluationusingacommunitycrashrecordingsystem
AT pilkingtonpaul completenessofpolicereportingoftrafficcrashesinnepalevaluationusingacommunitycrashrecordingsystem
AT joshisunilkumar completenessofpolicereportingoftrafficcrashesinnepalevaluationusingacommunitycrashrecordingsystem
AT myttonjulie completenessofpolicereportingoftrafficcrashesinnepalevaluationusingacommunitycrashrecordingsystem