Cargando…
Partisan Differences in Legislators’ Discussion of Vaccination on Twitter During the COVID-19 Era: Natural Language Processing Analysis
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 era has been characterized by the politicization of health-related topics. This is especially concerning given evidence that politicized discussion of vaccination may contribute to vaccine hesitancy. No research, however, has examined the content and politicization of legisl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35229075 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32372 |
_version_ | 1784655105660813312 |
---|---|
author | Engel-Rebitzer, Eden Stokes, Daniel C Meisel, Zachary F Purtle, Jonathan Doyle, Rebecca Buttenheim, Alison M |
author_facet | Engel-Rebitzer, Eden Stokes, Daniel C Meisel, Zachary F Purtle, Jonathan Doyle, Rebecca Buttenheim, Alison M |
author_sort | Engel-Rebitzer, Eden |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 era has been characterized by the politicization of health-related topics. This is especially concerning given evidence that politicized discussion of vaccination may contribute to vaccine hesitancy. No research, however, has examined the content and politicization of legislator communication with the public about vaccination during the COVID-19 era. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine vaccine-related tweets produced by state and federal legislators during the COVID-19 era to (1) describe the content of vaccine-related tweets; (2) examine the differences in vaccine-related tweet content between Democrats and Republicans; and (3) quantify (and describe trends over time in) partisan differences in vaccine-related communication. METHODS: We abstracted all vaccine-related tweets produced by state and federal legislators between February 01, 2020, and December 11, 2020. We used latent Dirichlet allocation to define the tweet topics and used descriptive statistics to describe differences by party in the use of topics and changes in political polarization over time. RESULTS: We included 14,519 tweets generated by 1463 state legislators and 521 federal legislators. Republicans were more likely to use words (eg, “record time,” “launched,” and “innovation”) and topics (eg, Operation Warp Speed success) that were focused on the successful development of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Democrats used a broader range of words (eg, “anti-vaxxers,” “flu,” and “free”) and topics (eg, vaccine prioritization, influenza, and antivaxxers) that were more aligned with public health messaging related to the vaccine. Polarization increased over most of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Republican and Democratic legislators used different language in their Twitter conversations about vaccination during the COVID-19 era, leading to increased political polarization of vaccine-related tweets. These communication patterns have the potential to contribute to vaccine hesitancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8862742 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88627422022-02-24 Partisan Differences in Legislators’ Discussion of Vaccination on Twitter During the COVID-19 Era: Natural Language Processing Analysis Engel-Rebitzer, Eden Stokes, Daniel C Meisel, Zachary F Purtle, Jonathan Doyle, Rebecca Buttenheim, Alison M JMIR Infodemiology Original Paper BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 era has been characterized by the politicization of health-related topics. This is especially concerning given evidence that politicized discussion of vaccination may contribute to vaccine hesitancy. No research, however, has examined the content and politicization of legislator communication with the public about vaccination during the COVID-19 era. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine vaccine-related tweets produced by state and federal legislators during the COVID-19 era to (1) describe the content of vaccine-related tweets; (2) examine the differences in vaccine-related tweet content between Democrats and Republicans; and (3) quantify (and describe trends over time in) partisan differences in vaccine-related communication. METHODS: We abstracted all vaccine-related tweets produced by state and federal legislators between February 01, 2020, and December 11, 2020. We used latent Dirichlet allocation to define the tweet topics and used descriptive statistics to describe differences by party in the use of topics and changes in political polarization over time. RESULTS: We included 14,519 tweets generated by 1463 state legislators and 521 federal legislators. Republicans were more likely to use words (eg, “record time,” “launched,” and “innovation”) and topics (eg, Operation Warp Speed success) that were focused on the successful development of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Democrats used a broader range of words (eg, “anti-vaxxers,” “flu,” and “free”) and topics (eg, vaccine prioritization, influenza, and antivaxxers) that were more aligned with public health messaging related to the vaccine. Polarization increased over most of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Republican and Democratic legislators used different language in their Twitter conversations about vaccination during the COVID-19 era, leading to increased political polarization of vaccine-related tweets. These communication patterns have the potential to contribute to vaccine hesitancy. JMIR Publications 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8862742/ /pubmed/35229075 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32372 Text en ©Eden Engel-Rebitzer, Daniel C Stokes, Zachary F Meisel, Jonathan Purtle, Rebecca Doyle, Alison M Buttenheim. Originally published in JMIR Infodemiology (https://infodemiology.jmir.org), 18.02.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Infodemiology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://infodemiology.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Engel-Rebitzer, Eden Stokes, Daniel C Meisel, Zachary F Purtle, Jonathan Doyle, Rebecca Buttenheim, Alison M Partisan Differences in Legislators’ Discussion of Vaccination on Twitter During the COVID-19 Era: Natural Language Processing Analysis |
title | Partisan Differences in Legislators’ Discussion of Vaccination on Twitter During the COVID-19 Era: Natural Language Processing Analysis |
title_full | Partisan Differences in Legislators’ Discussion of Vaccination on Twitter During the COVID-19 Era: Natural Language Processing Analysis |
title_fullStr | Partisan Differences in Legislators’ Discussion of Vaccination on Twitter During the COVID-19 Era: Natural Language Processing Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Partisan Differences in Legislators’ Discussion of Vaccination on Twitter During the COVID-19 Era: Natural Language Processing Analysis |
title_short | Partisan Differences in Legislators’ Discussion of Vaccination on Twitter During the COVID-19 Era: Natural Language Processing Analysis |
title_sort | partisan differences in legislators’ discussion of vaccination on twitter during the covid-19 era: natural language processing analysis |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8862742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35229075 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32372 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT engelrebitzereden partisandifferencesinlegislatorsdiscussionofvaccinationontwitterduringthecovid19eranaturallanguageprocessinganalysis AT stokesdanielc partisandifferencesinlegislatorsdiscussionofvaccinationontwitterduringthecovid19eranaturallanguageprocessinganalysis AT meiselzacharyf partisandifferencesinlegislatorsdiscussionofvaccinationontwitterduringthecovid19eranaturallanguageprocessinganalysis AT purtlejonathan partisandifferencesinlegislatorsdiscussionofvaccinationontwitterduringthecovid19eranaturallanguageprocessinganalysis AT doylerebecca partisandifferencesinlegislatorsdiscussionofvaccinationontwitterduringthecovid19eranaturallanguageprocessinganalysis AT buttenheimalisonm partisandifferencesinlegislatorsdiscussionofvaccinationontwitterduringthecovid19eranaturallanguageprocessinganalysis |