Cargando…

Ribosomal DNA promoter recognition is determined in vivo by cooperation between UBTF1 and SL1 and is compromised in the UBTF-E210K neuroregression syndrome

Transcription of the ~200 mouse and human ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA) by RNA Polymerase I (RPI/PolR1) accounts for 80% of total cellular RNA, around 35% of all nuclear RNA synthesis, and determines the cytoplasmic ribosome complement. It is therefore a major factor controlling cell growth and its mis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tremblay, Michel G., Sibai, Dany S., Valère, Melissa, Mars, Jean-Clément, Lessard, Frédéric, Hori, Roderick T., Khan, Mohammad Moshahid, Stefanovsky, Victor Y., LeDoux, Mark S., Moss, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8863233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35139074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009644
_version_ 1784655194313719808
author Tremblay, Michel G.
Sibai, Dany S.
Valère, Melissa
Mars, Jean-Clément
Lessard, Frédéric
Hori, Roderick T.
Khan, Mohammad Moshahid
Stefanovsky, Victor Y.
LeDoux, Mark S.
Moss, Tom
author_facet Tremblay, Michel G.
Sibai, Dany S.
Valère, Melissa
Mars, Jean-Clément
Lessard, Frédéric
Hori, Roderick T.
Khan, Mohammad Moshahid
Stefanovsky, Victor Y.
LeDoux, Mark S.
Moss, Tom
author_sort Tremblay, Michel G.
collection PubMed
description Transcription of the ~200 mouse and human ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA) by RNA Polymerase I (RPI/PolR1) accounts for 80% of total cellular RNA, around 35% of all nuclear RNA synthesis, and determines the cytoplasmic ribosome complement. It is therefore a major factor controlling cell growth and its misfunction has been implicated in hypertrophic and developmental disorders. Activation of each rDNA repeat requires nucleosome replacement by the architectural multi-HMGbox factor UBTF to create a 15.7 kbp nucleosome free region (NFR). Formation of this NFR is also essential for recruitment of the TBP-TAF(I) factor SL1 and for preinitiation complex (PIC) formation at the gene and enhancer-associated promoters of the rDNA. However, these promoters show little sequence commonality and neither UBTF nor SL1 display significant DNA sequence binding specificity, making what drives PIC formation a mystery. Here we show that cooperation between SL1 and the longer UBTF1 splice variant generates the specificity required for rDNA promoter recognition in cell. We find that conditional deletion of the TAF1B subunit of SL1 causes a striking depletion of UBTF at both rDNA promoters but not elsewhere across the rDNA. We also find that while both UBTF1 and -2 variants bind throughout the rDNA NFR, only UBTF1 is present with SL1 at the promoters. The data strongly suggest an induced-fit model of RPI promoter recognition in which UBTF1 plays an architectural role. Interestingly, a recurrent UBTF-E210K mutation and the cause of a pediatric neurodegeneration syndrome provides indirect support for this model. E210K knock-in cells show enhanced levels of the UBTF1 splice variant and a concomitant increase in active rDNA copies. In contrast, they also display reduced rDNA transcription and promoter recruitment of SL1. We suggest the underlying cause of the UBTF-E210K syndrome is therefore a reduction in cooperative UBTF1-SL1 promoter recruitment that may be partially compensated by enhanced rDNA activation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8863233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88632332022-02-23 Ribosomal DNA promoter recognition is determined in vivo by cooperation between UBTF1 and SL1 and is compromised in the UBTF-E210K neuroregression syndrome Tremblay, Michel G. Sibai, Dany S. Valère, Melissa Mars, Jean-Clément Lessard, Frédéric Hori, Roderick T. Khan, Mohammad Moshahid Stefanovsky, Victor Y. LeDoux, Mark S. Moss, Tom PLoS Genet Research Article Transcription of the ~200 mouse and human ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA) by RNA Polymerase I (RPI/PolR1) accounts for 80% of total cellular RNA, around 35% of all nuclear RNA synthesis, and determines the cytoplasmic ribosome complement. It is therefore a major factor controlling cell growth and its misfunction has been implicated in hypertrophic and developmental disorders. Activation of each rDNA repeat requires nucleosome replacement by the architectural multi-HMGbox factor UBTF to create a 15.7 kbp nucleosome free region (NFR). Formation of this NFR is also essential for recruitment of the TBP-TAF(I) factor SL1 and for preinitiation complex (PIC) formation at the gene and enhancer-associated promoters of the rDNA. However, these promoters show little sequence commonality and neither UBTF nor SL1 display significant DNA sequence binding specificity, making what drives PIC formation a mystery. Here we show that cooperation between SL1 and the longer UBTF1 splice variant generates the specificity required for rDNA promoter recognition in cell. We find that conditional deletion of the TAF1B subunit of SL1 causes a striking depletion of UBTF at both rDNA promoters but not elsewhere across the rDNA. We also find that while both UBTF1 and -2 variants bind throughout the rDNA NFR, only UBTF1 is present with SL1 at the promoters. The data strongly suggest an induced-fit model of RPI promoter recognition in which UBTF1 plays an architectural role. Interestingly, a recurrent UBTF-E210K mutation and the cause of a pediatric neurodegeneration syndrome provides indirect support for this model. E210K knock-in cells show enhanced levels of the UBTF1 splice variant and a concomitant increase in active rDNA copies. In contrast, they also display reduced rDNA transcription and promoter recruitment of SL1. We suggest the underlying cause of the UBTF-E210K syndrome is therefore a reduction in cooperative UBTF1-SL1 promoter recruitment that may be partially compensated by enhanced rDNA activation. Public Library of Science 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8863233/ /pubmed/35139074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009644 Text en © 2022 Tremblay et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tremblay, Michel G.
Sibai, Dany S.
Valère, Melissa
Mars, Jean-Clément
Lessard, Frédéric
Hori, Roderick T.
Khan, Mohammad Moshahid
Stefanovsky, Victor Y.
LeDoux, Mark S.
Moss, Tom
Ribosomal DNA promoter recognition is determined in vivo by cooperation between UBTF1 and SL1 and is compromised in the UBTF-E210K neuroregression syndrome
title Ribosomal DNA promoter recognition is determined in vivo by cooperation between UBTF1 and SL1 and is compromised in the UBTF-E210K neuroregression syndrome
title_full Ribosomal DNA promoter recognition is determined in vivo by cooperation between UBTF1 and SL1 and is compromised in the UBTF-E210K neuroregression syndrome
title_fullStr Ribosomal DNA promoter recognition is determined in vivo by cooperation between UBTF1 and SL1 and is compromised in the UBTF-E210K neuroregression syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Ribosomal DNA promoter recognition is determined in vivo by cooperation between UBTF1 and SL1 and is compromised in the UBTF-E210K neuroregression syndrome
title_short Ribosomal DNA promoter recognition is determined in vivo by cooperation between UBTF1 and SL1 and is compromised in the UBTF-E210K neuroregression syndrome
title_sort ribosomal dna promoter recognition is determined in vivo by cooperation between ubtf1 and sl1 and is compromised in the ubtf-e210k neuroregression syndrome
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8863233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35139074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009644
work_keys_str_mv AT tremblaymichelg ribosomaldnapromoterrecognitionisdeterminedinvivobycooperationbetweenubtf1andsl1andiscompromisedintheubtfe210kneuroregressionsyndrome
AT sibaidanys ribosomaldnapromoterrecognitionisdeterminedinvivobycooperationbetweenubtf1andsl1andiscompromisedintheubtfe210kneuroregressionsyndrome
AT valeremelissa ribosomaldnapromoterrecognitionisdeterminedinvivobycooperationbetweenubtf1andsl1andiscompromisedintheubtfe210kneuroregressionsyndrome
AT marsjeanclement ribosomaldnapromoterrecognitionisdeterminedinvivobycooperationbetweenubtf1andsl1andiscompromisedintheubtfe210kneuroregressionsyndrome
AT lessardfrederic ribosomaldnapromoterrecognitionisdeterminedinvivobycooperationbetweenubtf1andsl1andiscompromisedintheubtfe210kneuroregressionsyndrome
AT horiroderickt ribosomaldnapromoterrecognitionisdeterminedinvivobycooperationbetweenubtf1andsl1andiscompromisedintheubtfe210kneuroregressionsyndrome
AT khanmohammadmoshahid ribosomaldnapromoterrecognitionisdeterminedinvivobycooperationbetweenubtf1andsl1andiscompromisedintheubtfe210kneuroregressionsyndrome
AT stefanovskyvictory ribosomaldnapromoterrecognitionisdeterminedinvivobycooperationbetweenubtf1andsl1andiscompromisedintheubtfe210kneuroregressionsyndrome
AT ledouxmarks ribosomaldnapromoterrecognitionisdeterminedinvivobycooperationbetweenubtf1andsl1andiscompromisedintheubtfe210kneuroregressionsyndrome
AT mosstom ribosomaldnapromoterrecognitionisdeterminedinvivobycooperationbetweenubtf1andsl1andiscompromisedintheubtfe210kneuroregressionsyndrome