Cargando…
Prone position protocol in awake COVID-19 patients: A prospective study in the emergency department
BACKGROUND: Limited effective interventions exist in the emergency department (ED) for COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure. One of the promising interventions is the prone position, which has been proven to improve oxygenation in ICU settings. Here, we aimed to describe and assess the utility...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8863327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35272978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2022.02.008 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Limited effective interventions exist in the emergency department (ED) for COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure. One of the promising interventions is the prone position, which has been proven to improve oxygenation in ICU settings. Here, we aimed to describe and assess the utility of the prone position in awake non-intubated adult patients in EDs during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of hypoxic COVID-19 adult patients who presented to our emergency department. We collected the data from June to the end of August 2020, including vital signs and physiological and clinical parameters before and after completing the four-hour prone position protocol. The main outcomes assessed were improvement in oxygenation, respiratory rate, respiratory distress score, ICU admission, and intubation. Oxygenation was calculated based on the standard pulse oximeter saturation [SpO(2)]/fractional concentration of oxygen in inspired air (FiO(2)). RESULTS: The study included 49 patients (81.63% men; mean age, 53.37 ± 11 years). The mean oxygen saturation during the triage was 84.49% ± 7.98 on room air. After completing of the four-hour prone protocol, the mean SpO(2)/FiO(2) ratio increased from 1.62 ± 0.78–1.99 ± 0.75 (p < 0.0001). The respiratory rate decreased from 32.45 ± 5.24–26.29 ± 5.40 (p < 0.0001). Respiratory distress scores decreased after changing patients’ positions (p < 0.0001). Twenty-four patients (48.9%) were admitted to the ICU, 6 patients were intubated (12.2%), and 7 (14.3%) died in the hospital. CONCLUSION: After applying the prone position in the ED, significant and immediate improvement was observed in oxygenation, respiratory rate, respiratory distress, and carbon dioxide levels. A linear relationship between the level of improvement in oxygenation and reduction in ICU admission was observed. However, further studies recommended to assess the advantage of the procedure in terms of ICU admission, intubation, or mortality. |
---|