Cargando…
Large Conization—Retrospective Monocentric Results for Fertility Preservation in Young Women with Early Stage Cervical Cancer
The shorter cervical segment after classic radical trachelectomy (RT) imposes a number of pregnancy associated risk factors. In this aspect, large conization (LC) could be an oncologically safe alternative to RT in young women with early stage cervical cancer who want to spare their fertility. Our a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8863693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34845668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00807-9 |
_version_ | 1784655285144518656 |
---|---|
author | Tsaousidis, Christos Kraemer, Bernhard Kommoss, Stefan Hartkopf, Andreas Brucker, Sara Neis, Katrin Andress, Juergen Neis, Felix |
author_facet | Tsaousidis, Christos Kraemer, Bernhard Kommoss, Stefan Hartkopf, Andreas Brucker, Sara Neis, Katrin Andress, Juergen Neis, Felix |
author_sort | Tsaousidis, Christos |
collection | PubMed |
description | The shorter cervical segment after classic radical trachelectomy (RT) imposes a number of pregnancy associated risk factors. In this aspect, large conization (LC) could be an oncologically safe alternative to RT in young women with early stage cervical cancer who want to spare their fertility. Our aim was to evaluate fertility-sparing surgical treatment of early stage cervical cancer after the introduction of LC. Our objectives were to assess surgical, oncological, fertility and obstetric outcomes. We retrospectively investigated oncological and fertility outcomes of patients who underwent LC in a large oncological single University centre between 2009 and 2014. Medical records were reviewed and analysed for surgical, oncological, fertility and obstetric outcomes. Postal questionnaires were collected to further evaluate and validate the fertility and obstetric outcomes. A total of 23 LCs were analysed. Seven patients had to undergo secondary radical hysterectomy after LC due to unclear resection margins. Nine of 16 women tried to conceive, of which all nine became pregnant. Seven patients underwent a prophylactic cerclage between 13 and 16 gestational weeks and seven women delivered 9 children; the majority of women conceived spontaneously. Follow-up time was a median of 3.9 years (2.6–8 years). There was no relapse of cervical cancer in the investigated timeframe. Early stage cervical cancers treated by LC are associated with excellent oncological outcomes. LC appears to be a safe option for eligible women who intend to maintain their fertility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8863693 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88636932022-03-02 Large Conization—Retrospective Monocentric Results for Fertility Preservation in Young Women with Early Stage Cervical Cancer Tsaousidis, Christos Kraemer, Bernhard Kommoss, Stefan Hartkopf, Andreas Brucker, Sara Neis, Katrin Andress, Juergen Neis, Felix Reprod Sci Gynecologic Oncology: Original Article The shorter cervical segment after classic radical trachelectomy (RT) imposes a number of pregnancy associated risk factors. In this aspect, large conization (LC) could be an oncologically safe alternative to RT in young women with early stage cervical cancer who want to spare their fertility. Our aim was to evaluate fertility-sparing surgical treatment of early stage cervical cancer after the introduction of LC. Our objectives were to assess surgical, oncological, fertility and obstetric outcomes. We retrospectively investigated oncological and fertility outcomes of patients who underwent LC in a large oncological single University centre between 2009 and 2014. Medical records were reviewed and analysed for surgical, oncological, fertility and obstetric outcomes. Postal questionnaires were collected to further evaluate and validate the fertility and obstetric outcomes. A total of 23 LCs were analysed. Seven patients had to undergo secondary radical hysterectomy after LC due to unclear resection margins. Nine of 16 women tried to conceive, of which all nine became pregnant. Seven patients underwent a prophylactic cerclage between 13 and 16 gestational weeks and seven women delivered 9 children; the majority of women conceived spontaneously. Follow-up time was a median of 3.9 years (2.6–8 years). There was no relapse of cervical cancer in the investigated timeframe. Early stage cervical cancers treated by LC are associated with excellent oncological outcomes. LC appears to be a safe option for eligible women who intend to maintain their fertility. Springer International Publishing 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8863693/ /pubmed/34845668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00807-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Gynecologic Oncology: Original Article Tsaousidis, Christos Kraemer, Bernhard Kommoss, Stefan Hartkopf, Andreas Brucker, Sara Neis, Katrin Andress, Juergen Neis, Felix Large Conization—Retrospective Monocentric Results for Fertility Preservation in Young Women with Early Stage Cervical Cancer |
title | Large Conization—Retrospective Monocentric Results for Fertility Preservation in Young Women with Early Stage Cervical Cancer |
title_full | Large Conization—Retrospective Monocentric Results for Fertility Preservation in Young Women with Early Stage Cervical Cancer |
title_fullStr | Large Conization—Retrospective Monocentric Results for Fertility Preservation in Young Women with Early Stage Cervical Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Large Conization—Retrospective Monocentric Results for Fertility Preservation in Young Women with Early Stage Cervical Cancer |
title_short | Large Conization—Retrospective Monocentric Results for Fertility Preservation in Young Women with Early Stage Cervical Cancer |
title_sort | large conization—retrospective monocentric results for fertility preservation in young women with early stage cervical cancer |
topic | Gynecologic Oncology: Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8863693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34845668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00807-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsaousidischristos largeconizationretrospectivemonocentricresultsforfertilitypreservationinyoungwomenwithearlystagecervicalcancer AT kraemerbernhard largeconizationretrospectivemonocentricresultsforfertilitypreservationinyoungwomenwithearlystagecervicalcancer AT kommossstefan largeconizationretrospectivemonocentricresultsforfertilitypreservationinyoungwomenwithearlystagecervicalcancer AT hartkopfandreas largeconizationretrospectivemonocentricresultsforfertilitypreservationinyoungwomenwithearlystagecervicalcancer AT bruckersara largeconizationretrospectivemonocentricresultsforfertilitypreservationinyoungwomenwithearlystagecervicalcancer AT neiskatrin largeconizationretrospectivemonocentricresultsforfertilitypreservationinyoungwomenwithearlystagecervicalcancer AT andressjuergen largeconizationretrospectivemonocentricresultsforfertilitypreservationinyoungwomenwithearlystagecervicalcancer AT neisfelix largeconizationretrospectivemonocentricresultsforfertilitypreservationinyoungwomenwithearlystagecervicalcancer |