Cargando…

Large Conization—Retrospective Monocentric Results for Fertility Preservation in Young Women with Early Stage Cervical Cancer

The shorter cervical segment after classic radical trachelectomy (RT) imposes a number of pregnancy associated risk factors. In this aspect, large conization (LC) could be an oncologically safe alternative to RT in young women with early stage cervical cancer who want to spare their fertility. Our a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsaousidis, Christos, Kraemer, Bernhard, Kommoss, Stefan, Hartkopf, Andreas, Brucker, Sara, Neis, Katrin, Andress, Juergen, Neis, Felix
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8863693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34845668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00807-9
_version_ 1784655285144518656
author Tsaousidis, Christos
Kraemer, Bernhard
Kommoss, Stefan
Hartkopf, Andreas
Brucker, Sara
Neis, Katrin
Andress, Juergen
Neis, Felix
author_facet Tsaousidis, Christos
Kraemer, Bernhard
Kommoss, Stefan
Hartkopf, Andreas
Brucker, Sara
Neis, Katrin
Andress, Juergen
Neis, Felix
author_sort Tsaousidis, Christos
collection PubMed
description The shorter cervical segment after classic radical trachelectomy (RT) imposes a number of pregnancy associated risk factors. In this aspect, large conization (LC) could be an oncologically safe alternative to RT in young women with early stage cervical cancer who want to spare their fertility. Our aim was to evaluate fertility-sparing surgical treatment of early stage cervical cancer after the introduction of LC. Our objectives were to assess surgical, oncological, fertility and obstetric outcomes. We retrospectively investigated oncological and fertility outcomes of patients who underwent LC in a large oncological single University centre between 2009 and 2014. Medical records were reviewed and analysed for surgical, oncological, fertility and obstetric outcomes. Postal questionnaires were collected to further evaluate and validate the fertility and obstetric outcomes. A total of 23 LCs were analysed. Seven patients had to undergo secondary radical hysterectomy after LC due to unclear resection margins. Nine of 16 women tried to conceive, of which all nine became pregnant. Seven patients underwent a prophylactic cerclage between 13 and 16 gestational weeks and seven women delivered 9 children; the majority of women conceived spontaneously. Follow-up time was a median of 3.9 years (2.6–8 years). There was no relapse of cervical cancer in the investigated timeframe. Early stage cervical cancers treated by LC are associated with excellent oncological outcomes. LC appears to be a safe option for eligible women who intend to maintain their fertility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8863693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88636932022-03-02 Large Conization—Retrospective Monocentric Results for Fertility Preservation in Young Women with Early Stage Cervical Cancer Tsaousidis, Christos Kraemer, Bernhard Kommoss, Stefan Hartkopf, Andreas Brucker, Sara Neis, Katrin Andress, Juergen Neis, Felix Reprod Sci Gynecologic Oncology: Original Article The shorter cervical segment after classic radical trachelectomy (RT) imposes a number of pregnancy associated risk factors. In this aspect, large conization (LC) could be an oncologically safe alternative to RT in young women with early stage cervical cancer who want to spare their fertility. Our aim was to evaluate fertility-sparing surgical treatment of early stage cervical cancer after the introduction of LC. Our objectives were to assess surgical, oncological, fertility and obstetric outcomes. We retrospectively investigated oncological and fertility outcomes of patients who underwent LC in a large oncological single University centre between 2009 and 2014. Medical records were reviewed and analysed for surgical, oncological, fertility and obstetric outcomes. Postal questionnaires were collected to further evaluate and validate the fertility and obstetric outcomes. A total of 23 LCs were analysed. Seven patients had to undergo secondary radical hysterectomy after LC due to unclear resection margins. Nine of 16 women tried to conceive, of which all nine became pregnant. Seven patients underwent a prophylactic cerclage between 13 and 16 gestational weeks and seven women delivered 9 children; the majority of women conceived spontaneously. Follow-up time was a median of 3.9 years (2.6–8 years). There was no relapse of cervical cancer in the investigated timeframe. Early stage cervical cancers treated by LC are associated with excellent oncological outcomes. LC appears to be a safe option for eligible women who intend to maintain their fertility. Springer International Publishing 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8863693/ /pubmed/34845668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00807-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Gynecologic Oncology: Original Article
Tsaousidis, Christos
Kraemer, Bernhard
Kommoss, Stefan
Hartkopf, Andreas
Brucker, Sara
Neis, Katrin
Andress, Juergen
Neis, Felix
Large Conization—Retrospective Monocentric Results for Fertility Preservation in Young Women with Early Stage Cervical Cancer
title Large Conization—Retrospective Monocentric Results for Fertility Preservation in Young Women with Early Stage Cervical Cancer
title_full Large Conization—Retrospective Monocentric Results for Fertility Preservation in Young Women with Early Stage Cervical Cancer
title_fullStr Large Conization—Retrospective Monocentric Results for Fertility Preservation in Young Women with Early Stage Cervical Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Large Conization—Retrospective Monocentric Results for Fertility Preservation in Young Women with Early Stage Cervical Cancer
title_short Large Conization—Retrospective Monocentric Results for Fertility Preservation in Young Women with Early Stage Cervical Cancer
title_sort large conization—retrospective monocentric results for fertility preservation in young women with early stage cervical cancer
topic Gynecologic Oncology: Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8863693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34845668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00807-9
work_keys_str_mv AT tsaousidischristos largeconizationretrospectivemonocentricresultsforfertilitypreservationinyoungwomenwithearlystagecervicalcancer
AT kraemerbernhard largeconizationretrospectivemonocentricresultsforfertilitypreservationinyoungwomenwithearlystagecervicalcancer
AT kommossstefan largeconizationretrospectivemonocentricresultsforfertilitypreservationinyoungwomenwithearlystagecervicalcancer
AT hartkopfandreas largeconizationretrospectivemonocentricresultsforfertilitypreservationinyoungwomenwithearlystagecervicalcancer
AT bruckersara largeconizationretrospectivemonocentricresultsforfertilitypreservationinyoungwomenwithearlystagecervicalcancer
AT neiskatrin largeconizationretrospectivemonocentricresultsforfertilitypreservationinyoungwomenwithearlystagecervicalcancer
AT andressjuergen largeconizationretrospectivemonocentricresultsforfertilitypreservationinyoungwomenwithearlystagecervicalcancer
AT neisfelix largeconizationretrospectivemonocentricresultsforfertilitypreservationinyoungwomenwithearlystagecervicalcancer