Cargando…

Cambridge Psycholinguistic Inventory of Christian Beliefs: A registered report of construct validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability

While religious beliefs are typically studied using questionnaires, there are no standardized tools available for cognitive psychology and neuroscience studies of religious cognition. Here we present the first such tool—the Cambridge Psycholinguistic Inventory of Christian Beliefs (CPICB)—which cons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clackson, Kaili, Pohran, Nadya, Galli, Riccardo M., Labno, Laura, Farias, Miguel, Bekinschtein, Tristan A., Noreika, Valdas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8863718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244985
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01632-3
_version_ 1784655291089944576
author Clackson, Kaili
Pohran, Nadya
Galli, Riccardo M.
Labno, Laura
Farias, Miguel
Bekinschtein, Tristan A.
Noreika, Valdas
author_facet Clackson, Kaili
Pohran, Nadya
Galli, Riccardo M.
Labno, Laura
Farias, Miguel
Bekinschtein, Tristan A.
Noreika, Valdas
author_sort Clackson, Kaili
collection PubMed
description While religious beliefs are typically studied using questionnaires, there are no standardized tools available for cognitive psychology and neuroscience studies of religious cognition. Here we present the first such tool—the Cambridge Psycholinguistic Inventory of Christian Beliefs (CPICB)—which consists of audio-recorded items of religious beliefs as well as items of three control conditions: moral beliefs, abstract scientific knowledge and empirical everyday life knowledge. The CPICB is designed in such a way that the ultimate meaning of each sentence is revealed only by its final critical word, which enables the precise measurement of reaction times and/or latencies of neurophysiological responses. Each statement comes in a pair of Agree/Disagree versions of critical words, which allows for experimental contrasting between belief and disbelief conditions. Psycholinguistic and psychoacoustic matching between Agree/Disagree versions of sentences, as well as across different categories of the CPICB items (Religious, Moral, Scientific, Everyday), enables rigorous control of low-level psycholinguistic and psychoacoustic features while testing higher-level beliefs. In the exploratory Study 1 (N = 20), we developed and tested a preliminary version of the CPICB that had 480 items. After selecting 400 items that yielded the most consistent responses, we carried out a confirmatory test–retest Study 2 (N = 40). Preregistered data analyses confirmed excellent construct validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the CPICB religious belief statements. We conclude that the CPICB is suitable for studying Christian beliefs in an experimental setting involving behavioural and neuroimaging paradigms, and provide Open Access to the inventory items, fostering further development of the experimental research of religiosity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13428-021-01632-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8863718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88637182022-03-02 Cambridge Psycholinguistic Inventory of Christian Beliefs: A registered report of construct validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability Clackson, Kaili Pohran, Nadya Galli, Riccardo M. Labno, Laura Farias, Miguel Bekinschtein, Tristan A. Noreika, Valdas Behav Res Methods Article While religious beliefs are typically studied using questionnaires, there are no standardized tools available for cognitive psychology and neuroscience studies of religious cognition. Here we present the first such tool—the Cambridge Psycholinguistic Inventory of Christian Beliefs (CPICB)—which consists of audio-recorded items of religious beliefs as well as items of three control conditions: moral beliefs, abstract scientific knowledge and empirical everyday life knowledge. The CPICB is designed in such a way that the ultimate meaning of each sentence is revealed only by its final critical word, which enables the precise measurement of reaction times and/or latencies of neurophysiological responses. Each statement comes in a pair of Agree/Disagree versions of critical words, which allows for experimental contrasting between belief and disbelief conditions. Psycholinguistic and psychoacoustic matching between Agree/Disagree versions of sentences, as well as across different categories of the CPICB items (Religious, Moral, Scientific, Everyday), enables rigorous control of low-level psycholinguistic and psychoacoustic features while testing higher-level beliefs. In the exploratory Study 1 (N = 20), we developed and tested a preliminary version of the CPICB that had 480 items. After selecting 400 items that yielded the most consistent responses, we carried out a confirmatory test–retest Study 2 (N = 40). Preregistered data analyses confirmed excellent construct validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the CPICB religious belief statements. We conclude that the CPICB is suitable for studying Christian beliefs in an experimental setting involving behavioural and neuroimaging paradigms, and provide Open Access to the inventory items, fostering further development of the experimental research of religiosity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13428-021-01632-3. Springer US 2021-07-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8863718/ /pubmed/34244985 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01632-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Clackson, Kaili
Pohran, Nadya
Galli, Riccardo M.
Labno, Laura
Farias, Miguel
Bekinschtein, Tristan A.
Noreika, Valdas
Cambridge Psycholinguistic Inventory of Christian Beliefs: A registered report of construct validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability
title Cambridge Psycholinguistic Inventory of Christian Beliefs: A registered report of construct validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability
title_full Cambridge Psycholinguistic Inventory of Christian Beliefs: A registered report of construct validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability
title_fullStr Cambridge Psycholinguistic Inventory of Christian Beliefs: A registered report of construct validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability
title_full_unstemmed Cambridge Psycholinguistic Inventory of Christian Beliefs: A registered report of construct validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability
title_short Cambridge Psycholinguistic Inventory of Christian Beliefs: A registered report of construct validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability
title_sort cambridge psycholinguistic inventory of christian beliefs: a registered report of construct validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8863718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244985
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01632-3
work_keys_str_mv AT clacksonkaili cambridgepsycholinguisticinventoryofchristianbeliefsaregisteredreportofconstructvalidityinternalconsistencyandtestretestreliability
AT pohrannadya cambridgepsycholinguisticinventoryofchristianbeliefsaregisteredreportofconstructvalidityinternalconsistencyandtestretestreliability
AT galliriccardom cambridgepsycholinguisticinventoryofchristianbeliefsaregisteredreportofconstructvalidityinternalconsistencyandtestretestreliability
AT labnolaura cambridgepsycholinguisticinventoryofchristianbeliefsaregisteredreportofconstructvalidityinternalconsistencyandtestretestreliability
AT fariasmiguel cambridgepsycholinguisticinventoryofchristianbeliefsaregisteredreportofconstructvalidityinternalconsistencyandtestretestreliability
AT bekinschteintristana cambridgepsycholinguisticinventoryofchristianbeliefsaregisteredreportofconstructvalidityinternalconsistencyandtestretestreliability
AT noreikavaldas cambridgepsycholinguisticinventoryofchristianbeliefsaregisteredreportofconstructvalidityinternalconsistencyandtestretestreliability