Cargando…

Comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial RNA SARS-CoV-2 assays

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the performance of the NeuMoDx™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay, implemented on the NeuMoDx 96 Molecular System, with that of the ThermoFisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit (reference method). METHODS: Overall, 450 nasopharyngeal swab samples, previously tested using t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Litchfield, Mark, Brookes, Paul, Ojrzynska, Agnieszka, Kavi, Janki, Dawood, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8863925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35217170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.02.032
_version_ 1784655339707170816
author Litchfield, Mark
Brookes, Paul
Ojrzynska, Agnieszka
Kavi, Janki
Dawood, Richard
author_facet Litchfield, Mark
Brookes, Paul
Ojrzynska, Agnieszka
Kavi, Janki
Dawood, Richard
author_sort Litchfield, Mark
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the performance of the NeuMoDx™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay, implemented on the NeuMoDx 96 Molecular System, with that of the ThermoFisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit (reference method). METHODS: Overall, 450 nasopharyngeal swab samples, previously tested using the reference method, were tested by the NeuMoDx Assay, and the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the assay were analyzed. RESULTS: By retrospective statistical analysis of all valid results, the NeuMoDx Assay had a clinical specificity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98.65–100.00) and a clinical sensitivity of 98.73% (95% CI: 95.47–99.85). CONCLUSIONS: The NeuMoDx SARS-CoV-2 Assay demonstrated comparable analytical and clinical performance to the ThermoFisher TaqPath COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit. The NeuMoDx 96 Molecular System is well suited for automating medium-throughput routine SARS-CoV-2 testing or as an addition to high-throughput systems to allow fast-tracking for highly urgent clinical samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8863925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88639252022-02-23 Comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial RNA SARS-CoV-2 assays Litchfield, Mark Brookes, Paul Ojrzynska, Agnieszka Kavi, Janki Dawood, Richard Int J Infect Dis Short Communication OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the performance of the NeuMoDx™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay, implemented on the NeuMoDx 96 Molecular System, with that of the ThermoFisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit (reference method). METHODS: Overall, 450 nasopharyngeal swab samples, previously tested using the reference method, were tested by the NeuMoDx Assay, and the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the assay were analyzed. RESULTS: By retrospective statistical analysis of all valid results, the NeuMoDx Assay had a clinical specificity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98.65–100.00) and a clinical sensitivity of 98.73% (95% CI: 95.47–99.85). CONCLUSIONS: The NeuMoDx SARS-CoV-2 Assay demonstrated comparable analytical and clinical performance to the ThermoFisher TaqPath COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit. The NeuMoDx 96 Molecular System is well suited for automating medium-throughput routine SARS-CoV-2 testing or as an addition to high-throughput systems to allow fast-tracking for highly urgent clinical samples. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2022-05 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8863925/ /pubmed/35217170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.02.032 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Litchfield, Mark
Brookes, Paul
Ojrzynska, Agnieszka
Kavi, Janki
Dawood, Richard
Comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial RNA SARS-CoV-2 assays
title Comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial RNA SARS-CoV-2 assays
title_full Comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial RNA SARS-CoV-2 assays
title_fullStr Comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial RNA SARS-CoV-2 assays
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial RNA SARS-CoV-2 assays
title_short Comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial RNA SARS-CoV-2 assays
title_sort comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial rna sars-cov-2 assays
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8863925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35217170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.02.032
work_keys_str_mv AT litchfieldmark comparisonoftheclinicalsensitivityandspecificityoftwocommercialrnasarscov2assays
AT brookespaul comparisonoftheclinicalsensitivityandspecificityoftwocommercialrnasarscov2assays
AT ojrzynskaagnieszka comparisonoftheclinicalsensitivityandspecificityoftwocommercialrnasarscov2assays
AT kavijanki comparisonoftheclinicalsensitivityandspecificityoftwocommercialrnasarscov2assays
AT dawoodrichard comparisonoftheclinicalsensitivityandspecificityoftwocommercialrnasarscov2assays