Cargando…
Comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial RNA SARS-CoV-2 assays
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the performance of the NeuMoDx™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay, implemented on the NeuMoDx 96 Molecular System, with that of the ThermoFisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit (reference method). METHODS: Overall, 450 nasopharyngeal swab samples, previously tested using t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8863925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35217170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.02.032 |
_version_ | 1784655339707170816 |
---|---|
author | Litchfield, Mark Brookes, Paul Ojrzynska, Agnieszka Kavi, Janki Dawood, Richard |
author_facet | Litchfield, Mark Brookes, Paul Ojrzynska, Agnieszka Kavi, Janki Dawood, Richard |
author_sort | Litchfield, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the performance of the NeuMoDx™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay, implemented on the NeuMoDx 96 Molecular System, with that of the ThermoFisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit (reference method). METHODS: Overall, 450 nasopharyngeal swab samples, previously tested using the reference method, were tested by the NeuMoDx Assay, and the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the assay were analyzed. RESULTS: By retrospective statistical analysis of all valid results, the NeuMoDx Assay had a clinical specificity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98.65–100.00) and a clinical sensitivity of 98.73% (95% CI: 95.47–99.85). CONCLUSIONS: The NeuMoDx SARS-CoV-2 Assay demonstrated comparable analytical and clinical performance to the ThermoFisher TaqPath COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit. The NeuMoDx 96 Molecular System is well suited for automating medium-throughput routine SARS-CoV-2 testing or as an addition to high-throughput systems to allow fast-tracking for highly urgent clinical samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8863925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88639252022-02-23 Comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial RNA SARS-CoV-2 assays Litchfield, Mark Brookes, Paul Ojrzynska, Agnieszka Kavi, Janki Dawood, Richard Int J Infect Dis Short Communication OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the performance of the NeuMoDx™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay, implemented on the NeuMoDx 96 Molecular System, with that of the ThermoFisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit (reference method). METHODS: Overall, 450 nasopharyngeal swab samples, previously tested using the reference method, were tested by the NeuMoDx Assay, and the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the assay were analyzed. RESULTS: By retrospective statistical analysis of all valid results, the NeuMoDx Assay had a clinical specificity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98.65–100.00) and a clinical sensitivity of 98.73% (95% CI: 95.47–99.85). CONCLUSIONS: The NeuMoDx SARS-CoV-2 Assay demonstrated comparable analytical and clinical performance to the ThermoFisher TaqPath COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit. The NeuMoDx 96 Molecular System is well suited for automating medium-throughput routine SARS-CoV-2 testing or as an addition to high-throughput systems to allow fast-tracking for highly urgent clinical samples. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2022-05 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8863925/ /pubmed/35217170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.02.032 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Litchfield, Mark Brookes, Paul Ojrzynska, Agnieszka Kavi, Janki Dawood, Richard Comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial RNA SARS-CoV-2 assays |
title | Comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial RNA SARS-CoV-2 assays |
title_full | Comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial RNA SARS-CoV-2 assays |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial RNA SARS-CoV-2 assays |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial RNA SARS-CoV-2 assays |
title_short | Comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial RNA SARS-CoV-2 assays |
title_sort | comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial rna sars-cov-2 assays |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8863925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35217170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.02.032 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT litchfieldmark comparisonoftheclinicalsensitivityandspecificityoftwocommercialrnasarscov2assays AT brookespaul comparisonoftheclinicalsensitivityandspecificityoftwocommercialrnasarscov2assays AT ojrzynskaagnieszka comparisonoftheclinicalsensitivityandspecificityoftwocommercialrnasarscov2assays AT kavijanki comparisonoftheclinicalsensitivityandspecificityoftwocommercialrnasarscov2assays AT dawoodrichard comparisonoftheclinicalsensitivityandspecificityoftwocommercialrnasarscov2assays |