Cargando…

The Diagnostic Performance of Maximum Uptake Value and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Ovarian or Adnexal Masses: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to provide evidence for using maximum uptake value (SUVmax) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to quantitatively differentiate benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal masses, and to indirectly compare their diagnostic performance. MATERIAL AND M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Xianwen, Liang, Zhigang, Zhang, Chuanqin, Wang, Guanlian, Cai, Jiong, Wang, Pan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35223521
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.840433
_version_ 1784655370023600128
author Hu, Xianwen
Liang, Zhigang
Zhang, Chuanqin
Wang, Guanlian
Cai, Jiong
Wang, Pan
author_facet Hu, Xianwen
Liang, Zhigang
Zhang, Chuanqin
Wang, Guanlian
Cai, Jiong
Wang, Pan
author_sort Hu, Xianwen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to provide evidence for using maximum uptake value (SUVmax) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to quantitatively differentiate benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal masses, and to indirectly compare their diagnostic performance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The association between SUVmax, ADC and ovarian or adnexal benign and malignant masses was searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases until October 1, 2021. Two authors independently extracted the data. Studies included in the analysis were required to provide data for the construction of a 2 × 2 contingency table to evaluate the diagnostic performance of SUVmax or ADC in differentiating benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal masses. The quality of the enrolled studies was evaluated by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) instrument, and the meta-analysis was conducted using Stata software version 14.0. Forest plots were generated according to the sensitivity and specificity of SUVmax and ADC, and meta-regression analysis was further used to assess heterogeneity between studies. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies were finally included in this meta-analysis by gradually excluding duplicate literatures, conference abstracts, guidelines, reviews, case reports, animal studies and so on. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of SUVmax for quantitative differentiation of benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal masses were 0.88 and 0.89, respectively, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity for ADC were 0.87 and 0.80, respectively. CONCLUSION: Quantitative SUVmax and ADC values have good diagnostic performance in differentiating benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal masses, and SUVmax has higher accuracy than ADC. Future prospective studies with large sample sizes are needed for the analysis of the role of SUVmax and ADC in the differentiation of benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal masses. 
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8864062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88640622022-02-24 The Diagnostic Performance of Maximum Uptake Value and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Ovarian or Adnexal Masses: A Meta-Analysis Hu, Xianwen Liang, Zhigang Zhang, Chuanqin Wang, Guanlian Cai, Jiong Wang, Pan Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to provide evidence for using maximum uptake value (SUVmax) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to quantitatively differentiate benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal masses, and to indirectly compare their diagnostic performance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The association between SUVmax, ADC and ovarian or adnexal benign and malignant masses was searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases until October 1, 2021. Two authors independently extracted the data. Studies included in the analysis were required to provide data for the construction of a 2 × 2 contingency table to evaluate the diagnostic performance of SUVmax or ADC in differentiating benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal masses. The quality of the enrolled studies was evaluated by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) instrument, and the meta-analysis was conducted using Stata software version 14.0. Forest plots were generated according to the sensitivity and specificity of SUVmax and ADC, and meta-regression analysis was further used to assess heterogeneity between studies. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies were finally included in this meta-analysis by gradually excluding duplicate literatures, conference abstracts, guidelines, reviews, case reports, animal studies and so on. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of SUVmax for quantitative differentiation of benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal masses were 0.88 and 0.89, respectively, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity for ADC were 0.87 and 0.80, respectively. CONCLUSION: Quantitative SUVmax and ADC values have good diagnostic performance in differentiating benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal masses, and SUVmax has higher accuracy than ADC. Future prospective studies with large sample sizes are needed for the analysis of the role of SUVmax and ADC in the differentiation of benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal masses.  Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8864062/ /pubmed/35223521 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.840433 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hu, Liang, Zhang, Wang, Cai and Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Hu, Xianwen
Liang, Zhigang
Zhang, Chuanqin
Wang, Guanlian
Cai, Jiong
Wang, Pan
The Diagnostic Performance of Maximum Uptake Value and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Ovarian or Adnexal Masses: A Meta-Analysis
title The Diagnostic Performance of Maximum Uptake Value and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Ovarian or Adnexal Masses: A Meta-Analysis
title_full The Diagnostic Performance of Maximum Uptake Value and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Ovarian or Adnexal Masses: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Diagnostic Performance of Maximum Uptake Value and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Ovarian or Adnexal Masses: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Diagnostic Performance of Maximum Uptake Value and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Ovarian or Adnexal Masses: A Meta-Analysis
title_short The Diagnostic Performance of Maximum Uptake Value and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Ovarian or Adnexal Masses: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort diagnostic performance of maximum uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal masses: a meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35223521
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.840433
work_keys_str_mv AT huxianwen thediagnosticperformanceofmaximumuptakevalueandapparentdiffusioncoefficientindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantovarianoradnexalmassesametaanalysis
AT liangzhigang thediagnosticperformanceofmaximumuptakevalueandapparentdiffusioncoefficientindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantovarianoradnexalmassesametaanalysis
AT zhangchuanqin thediagnosticperformanceofmaximumuptakevalueandapparentdiffusioncoefficientindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantovarianoradnexalmassesametaanalysis
AT wangguanlian thediagnosticperformanceofmaximumuptakevalueandapparentdiffusioncoefficientindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantovarianoradnexalmassesametaanalysis
AT caijiong thediagnosticperformanceofmaximumuptakevalueandapparentdiffusioncoefficientindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantovarianoradnexalmassesametaanalysis
AT wangpan thediagnosticperformanceofmaximumuptakevalueandapparentdiffusioncoefficientindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantovarianoradnexalmassesametaanalysis
AT huxianwen diagnosticperformanceofmaximumuptakevalueandapparentdiffusioncoefficientindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantovarianoradnexalmassesametaanalysis
AT liangzhigang diagnosticperformanceofmaximumuptakevalueandapparentdiffusioncoefficientindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantovarianoradnexalmassesametaanalysis
AT zhangchuanqin diagnosticperformanceofmaximumuptakevalueandapparentdiffusioncoefficientindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantovarianoradnexalmassesametaanalysis
AT wangguanlian diagnosticperformanceofmaximumuptakevalueandapparentdiffusioncoefficientindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantovarianoradnexalmassesametaanalysis
AT caijiong diagnosticperformanceofmaximumuptakevalueandapparentdiffusioncoefficientindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantovarianoradnexalmassesametaanalysis
AT wangpan diagnosticperformanceofmaximumuptakevalueandapparentdiffusioncoefficientindifferentiatingbenignandmalignantovarianoradnexalmassesametaanalysis