Cargando…
Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App for Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: Evaluation and Acceptability Analysis in a Two-Center Prospective Trial
BACKGROUND: One in eight women is diagnosed with breast cancer in the course of their life. As systematic palliative treatment has only a limited effect on survival rates, the concept of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was developed for measurement of patient-centered outcomes. Various studie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35133288 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16128 |
_version_ | 1784655479591403520 |
---|---|
author | Graf, Joachim Sickenberger, Nina Brusniak, Katharina Matthies, Lina Maria Deutsch, Thomas M Simoes, Elisabeth Plappert, Claudia Keilmann, Lucia Hartkopf, Andreas Walter, Christina Barbara Hahn, Markus Engler, Tobias Wallwiener, Stephanie Schuetz, Florian Fasching, Peter A Schneeweiss, Andreas Brucker, Sara Yvonne Wallwiener, Markus |
author_facet | Graf, Joachim Sickenberger, Nina Brusniak, Katharina Matthies, Lina Maria Deutsch, Thomas M Simoes, Elisabeth Plappert, Claudia Keilmann, Lucia Hartkopf, Andreas Walter, Christina Barbara Hahn, Markus Engler, Tobias Wallwiener, Stephanie Schuetz, Florian Fasching, Peter A Schneeweiss, Andreas Brucker, Sara Yvonne Wallwiener, Markus |
author_sort | Graf, Joachim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: One in eight women is diagnosed with breast cancer in the course of their life. As systematic palliative treatment has only a limited effect on survival rates, the concept of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was developed for measurement of patient-centered outcomes. Various studies have already demonstrated the reliability of paper-based patient-reported outcome (pPRO) and electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) surveys and that the 2 means of assessment are equally valid. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the acceptance and evaluation of a tablet-based ePRO app for breast cancer patients and to examine its suitability, effort, and difficulty in the context of HRQoL and sociodemographic factors. METHODS: Overall, 106 women with adjuvant or advanced breast cancer were included in a 2-center study at 2 major university hospitals in Germany. Patients were asked to answer HRQoL and PRO questionnaires both on a tablet on-site using a specific eHealth assessment website and on paper. The suitability, effort, and difficulty of the app and self-reported technical skills were also assessed. Only the results of the electronically acquired data are presented here. The results of the reliability of the pPRO data have already been published elsewhere. RESULTS: Patients regarded the ePRO assessment as more suitable (80/106, 75.5%), less stressful (73/106, 68.9%), and less difficult (69/106, 65.1%) than pPRO. The majority of patients stated that ePRO assessment improves health care in hospitals (87/106, 82.1%). However, evaluation of ePROs depended on the level of education (P=.003) in the dimensions of effort and difficulty (regression analysis). The app was rated highly in all categories. HRQoL data and therapy setting did not show significant correlations with the app’s evaluation parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that ePRO surveys are feasible for measuring HRQoL in breast cancer patients and that those patients prefer ePRO assessment to pPRO assessment. It can also be seen that patients consider ePRO assessment to improve hospital health care. However, studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to develop apps that address the needs of patients with lower levels of education and technical skills. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8864528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88645282022-03-10 Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App for Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: Evaluation and Acceptability Analysis in a Two-Center Prospective Trial Graf, Joachim Sickenberger, Nina Brusniak, Katharina Matthies, Lina Maria Deutsch, Thomas M Simoes, Elisabeth Plappert, Claudia Keilmann, Lucia Hartkopf, Andreas Walter, Christina Barbara Hahn, Markus Engler, Tobias Wallwiener, Stephanie Schuetz, Florian Fasching, Peter A Schneeweiss, Andreas Brucker, Sara Yvonne Wallwiener, Markus J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: One in eight women is diagnosed with breast cancer in the course of their life. As systematic palliative treatment has only a limited effect on survival rates, the concept of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was developed for measurement of patient-centered outcomes. Various studies have already demonstrated the reliability of paper-based patient-reported outcome (pPRO) and electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) surveys and that the 2 means of assessment are equally valid. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the acceptance and evaluation of a tablet-based ePRO app for breast cancer patients and to examine its suitability, effort, and difficulty in the context of HRQoL and sociodemographic factors. METHODS: Overall, 106 women with adjuvant or advanced breast cancer were included in a 2-center study at 2 major university hospitals in Germany. Patients were asked to answer HRQoL and PRO questionnaires both on a tablet on-site using a specific eHealth assessment website and on paper. The suitability, effort, and difficulty of the app and self-reported technical skills were also assessed. Only the results of the electronically acquired data are presented here. The results of the reliability of the pPRO data have already been published elsewhere. RESULTS: Patients regarded the ePRO assessment as more suitable (80/106, 75.5%), less stressful (73/106, 68.9%), and less difficult (69/106, 65.1%) than pPRO. The majority of patients stated that ePRO assessment improves health care in hospitals (87/106, 82.1%). However, evaluation of ePROs depended on the level of education (P=.003) in the dimensions of effort and difficulty (regression analysis). The app was rated highly in all categories. HRQoL data and therapy setting did not show significant correlations with the app’s evaluation parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that ePRO surveys are feasible for measuring HRQoL in breast cancer patients and that those patients prefer ePRO assessment to pPRO assessment. It can also be seen that patients consider ePRO assessment to improve hospital health care. However, studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to develop apps that address the needs of patients with lower levels of education and technical skills. JMIR Publications 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8864528/ /pubmed/35133288 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16128 Text en ©Joachim Graf, Nina Sickenberger, Katharina Brusniak, Lina Maria Matthies, Thomas M Deutsch, Elisabeth Simoes, Claudia Plappert, Lucia Keilmann, Andreas Hartkopf, Christina Barbara Walter, Markus Hahn, Tobias Engler, Stephanie Wallwiener, Florian Schuetz, Peter A Fasching, Andreas Schneeweiss, Sara Yvonne Brucker, Markus Wallwiener. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 08.02.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Graf, Joachim Sickenberger, Nina Brusniak, Katharina Matthies, Lina Maria Deutsch, Thomas M Simoes, Elisabeth Plappert, Claudia Keilmann, Lucia Hartkopf, Andreas Walter, Christina Barbara Hahn, Markus Engler, Tobias Wallwiener, Stephanie Schuetz, Florian Fasching, Peter A Schneeweiss, Andreas Brucker, Sara Yvonne Wallwiener, Markus Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App for Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: Evaluation and Acceptability Analysis in a Two-Center Prospective Trial |
title | Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App for Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: Evaluation and Acceptability Analysis in a Two-Center Prospective Trial |
title_full | Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App for Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: Evaluation and Acceptability Analysis in a Two-Center Prospective Trial |
title_fullStr | Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App for Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: Evaluation and Acceptability Analysis in a Two-Center Prospective Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App for Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: Evaluation and Acceptability Analysis in a Two-Center Prospective Trial |
title_short | Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App for Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: Evaluation and Acceptability Analysis in a Two-Center Prospective Trial |
title_sort | implementation of an electronic patient-reported outcome app for health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: evaluation and acceptability analysis in a two-center prospective trial |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35133288 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grafjoachim implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial AT sickenbergernina implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial AT brusniakkatharina implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial AT matthieslinamaria implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial AT deutschthomasm implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial AT simoeselisabeth implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial AT plappertclaudia implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial AT keilmannlucia implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial AT hartkopfandreas implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial AT walterchristinabarbara implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial AT hahnmarkus implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial AT englertobias implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial AT wallwienerstephanie implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial AT schuetzflorian implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial AT faschingpetera implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial AT schneeweissandreas implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial AT bruckersarayvonne implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial AT wallwienermarkus implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial |