Cargando…

Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App for Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: Evaluation and Acceptability Analysis in a Two-Center Prospective Trial

BACKGROUND: One in eight women is diagnosed with breast cancer in the course of their life. As systematic palliative treatment has only a limited effect on survival rates, the concept of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was developed for measurement of patient-centered outcomes. Various studie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graf, Joachim, Sickenberger, Nina, Brusniak, Katharina, Matthies, Lina Maria, Deutsch, Thomas M, Simoes, Elisabeth, Plappert, Claudia, Keilmann, Lucia, Hartkopf, Andreas, Walter, Christina Barbara, Hahn, Markus, Engler, Tobias, Wallwiener, Stephanie, Schuetz, Florian, Fasching, Peter A, Schneeweiss, Andreas, Brucker, Sara Yvonne, Wallwiener, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35133288
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16128
_version_ 1784655479591403520
author Graf, Joachim
Sickenberger, Nina
Brusniak, Katharina
Matthies, Lina Maria
Deutsch, Thomas M
Simoes, Elisabeth
Plappert, Claudia
Keilmann, Lucia
Hartkopf, Andreas
Walter, Christina Barbara
Hahn, Markus
Engler, Tobias
Wallwiener, Stephanie
Schuetz, Florian
Fasching, Peter A
Schneeweiss, Andreas
Brucker, Sara Yvonne
Wallwiener, Markus
author_facet Graf, Joachim
Sickenberger, Nina
Brusniak, Katharina
Matthies, Lina Maria
Deutsch, Thomas M
Simoes, Elisabeth
Plappert, Claudia
Keilmann, Lucia
Hartkopf, Andreas
Walter, Christina Barbara
Hahn, Markus
Engler, Tobias
Wallwiener, Stephanie
Schuetz, Florian
Fasching, Peter A
Schneeweiss, Andreas
Brucker, Sara Yvonne
Wallwiener, Markus
author_sort Graf, Joachim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One in eight women is diagnosed with breast cancer in the course of their life. As systematic palliative treatment has only a limited effect on survival rates, the concept of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was developed for measurement of patient-centered outcomes. Various studies have already demonstrated the reliability of paper-based patient-reported outcome (pPRO) and electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) surveys and that the 2 means of assessment are equally valid. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the acceptance and evaluation of a tablet-based ePRO app for breast cancer patients and to examine its suitability, effort, and difficulty in the context of HRQoL and sociodemographic factors. METHODS: Overall, 106 women with adjuvant or advanced breast cancer were included in a 2-center study at 2 major university hospitals in Germany. Patients were asked to answer HRQoL and PRO questionnaires both on a tablet on-site using a specific eHealth assessment website and on paper. The suitability, effort, and difficulty of the app and self-reported technical skills were also assessed. Only the results of the electronically acquired data are presented here. The results of the reliability of the pPRO data have already been published elsewhere. RESULTS: Patients regarded the ePRO assessment as more suitable (80/106, 75.5%), less stressful (73/106, 68.9%), and less difficult (69/106, 65.1%) than pPRO. The majority of patients stated that ePRO assessment improves health care in hospitals (87/106, 82.1%). However, evaluation of ePROs depended on the level of education (P=.003) in the dimensions of effort and difficulty (regression analysis). The app was rated highly in all categories. HRQoL data and therapy setting did not show significant correlations with the app’s evaluation parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that ePRO surveys are feasible for measuring HRQoL in breast cancer patients and that those patients prefer ePRO assessment to pPRO assessment. It can also be seen that patients consider ePRO assessment to improve hospital health care. However, studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to develop apps that address the needs of patients with lower levels of education and technical skills.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8864528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88645282022-03-10 Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App for Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: Evaluation and Acceptability Analysis in a Two-Center Prospective Trial Graf, Joachim Sickenberger, Nina Brusniak, Katharina Matthies, Lina Maria Deutsch, Thomas M Simoes, Elisabeth Plappert, Claudia Keilmann, Lucia Hartkopf, Andreas Walter, Christina Barbara Hahn, Markus Engler, Tobias Wallwiener, Stephanie Schuetz, Florian Fasching, Peter A Schneeweiss, Andreas Brucker, Sara Yvonne Wallwiener, Markus J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: One in eight women is diagnosed with breast cancer in the course of their life. As systematic palliative treatment has only a limited effect on survival rates, the concept of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was developed for measurement of patient-centered outcomes. Various studies have already demonstrated the reliability of paper-based patient-reported outcome (pPRO) and electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) surveys and that the 2 means of assessment are equally valid. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the acceptance and evaluation of a tablet-based ePRO app for breast cancer patients and to examine its suitability, effort, and difficulty in the context of HRQoL and sociodemographic factors. METHODS: Overall, 106 women with adjuvant or advanced breast cancer were included in a 2-center study at 2 major university hospitals in Germany. Patients were asked to answer HRQoL and PRO questionnaires both on a tablet on-site using a specific eHealth assessment website and on paper. The suitability, effort, and difficulty of the app and self-reported technical skills were also assessed. Only the results of the electronically acquired data are presented here. The results of the reliability of the pPRO data have already been published elsewhere. RESULTS: Patients regarded the ePRO assessment as more suitable (80/106, 75.5%), less stressful (73/106, 68.9%), and less difficult (69/106, 65.1%) than pPRO. The majority of patients stated that ePRO assessment improves health care in hospitals (87/106, 82.1%). However, evaluation of ePROs depended on the level of education (P=.003) in the dimensions of effort and difficulty (regression analysis). The app was rated highly in all categories. HRQoL data and therapy setting did not show significant correlations with the app’s evaluation parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that ePRO surveys are feasible for measuring HRQoL in breast cancer patients and that those patients prefer ePRO assessment to pPRO assessment. It can also be seen that patients consider ePRO assessment to improve hospital health care. However, studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to develop apps that address the needs of patients with lower levels of education and technical skills. JMIR Publications 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8864528/ /pubmed/35133288 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16128 Text en ©Joachim Graf, Nina Sickenberger, Katharina Brusniak, Lina Maria Matthies, Thomas M Deutsch, Elisabeth Simoes, Claudia Plappert, Lucia Keilmann, Andreas Hartkopf, Christina Barbara Walter, Markus Hahn, Tobias Engler, Stephanie Wallwiener, Florian Schuetz, Peter A Fasching, Andreas Schneeweiss, Sara Yvonne Brucker, Markus Wallwiener. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 08.02.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Graf, Joachim
Sickenberger, Nina
Brusniak, Katharina
Matthies, Lina Maria
Deutsch, Thomas M
Simoes, Elisabeth
Plappert, Claudia
Keilmann, Lucia
Hartkopf, Andreas
Walter, Christina Barbara
Hahn, Markus
Engler, Tobias
Wallwiener, Stephanie
Schuetz, Florian
Fasching, Peter A
Schneeweiss, Andreas
Brucker, Sara Yvonne
Wallwiener, Markus
Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App for Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: Evaluation and Acceptability Analysis in a Two-Center Prospective Trial
title Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App for Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: Evaluation and Acceptability Analysis in a Two-Center Prospective Trial
title_full Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App for Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: Evaluation and Acceptability Analysis in a Two-Center Prospective Trial
title_fullStr Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App for Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: Evaluation and Acceptability Analysis in a Two-Center Prospective Trial
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App for Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: Evaluation and Acceptability Analysis in a Two-Center Prospective Trial
title_short Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App for Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: Evaluation and Acceptability Analysis in a Two-Center Prospective Trial
title_sort implementation of an electronic patient-reported outcome app for health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: evaluation and acceptability analysis in a two-center prospective trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35133288
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16128
work_keys_str_mv AT grafjoachim implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial
AT sickenbergernina implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial
AT brusniakkatharina implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial
AT matthieslinamaria implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial
AT deutschthomasm implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial
AT simoeselisabeth implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial
AT plappertclaudia implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial
AT keilmannlucia implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial
AT hartkopfandreas implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial
AT walterchristinabarbara implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial
AT hahnmarkus implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial
AT englertobias implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial
AT wallwienerstephanie implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial
AT schuetzflorian implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial
AT faschingpetera implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial
AT schneeweissandreas implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial
AT bruckersarayvonne implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial
AT wallwienermarkus implementationofanelectronicpatientreportedoutcomeappforhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinbreastcancerpatientsevaluationandacceptabilityanalysisinatwocenterprospectivetrial