Cargando…

Wireless Coexistence of Cellular LBT Systems and BLE 5

The 2.4 GHz spectrum is home to several Radio Access Technologies (RATs), including ZigBee, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), and Wi-Fi. Accordingly, the technologies’ spectrum-sharing qualities have been extensively studied in literature. License-Assisted Access (LAA) Listen-Before-Talk (LBT) has been id...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MUHAMMAD, SIRAJ, KALAA, MOHAMAD OMAR AL, REFAI, HAZEM H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35211362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3056909
_version_ 1784655482853523456
author MUHAMMAD, SIRAJ
KALAA, MOHAMAD OMAR AL
REFAI, HAZEM H.
author_facet MUHAMMAD, SIRAJ
KALAA, MOHAMAD OMAR AL
REFAI, HAZEM H.
author_sort MUHAMMAD, SIRAJ
collection PubMed
description The 2.4 GHz spectrum is home to several Radio Access Technologies (RATs), including ZigBee, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), and Wi-Fi. Accordingly, the technologies’ spectrum-sharing qualities have been extensively studied in literature. License-Assisted Access (LAA) Listen-Before-Talk (LBT) has been identified in technical reports as the foundation for the channel access mechanism for 5G New Radio-Unlicensed (NR-U) operating in the 2.4 GHz Industrial, Scientific, and Medical (ISM) band. The introduction of NR-U into this band raises new concerns regarding coexistence of the newcomer with traditional incumbents. This article reports an investigation of BLE 5 and cellular LBT coexisting systems by means of empirical evaluation. The importance of this study stems from that the studied LBT mechanism is indicative of how 5G NR-U would perform in the 2.4 GHz band. Tests were performed in conformity with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C63.27 standard for evaluation of wireless coexistence, and results were reported in terms of throughput and interframe delays. In accordance with the standard and under different BLE physical layers (PHYs) and LBT priority classes, three setups were investigated. These pertain to the three tiers of evaluation, which correspond to the criticality of the device under test. Results demonstrated how BLE throughput dropped as the intended-to-unintended signal ratio decreased, and LBT classes exhibited a diminishing effect as the class priority descended. Long Range BLE PHY was found to sustain longer gap times (i.e., delay) than the other two PHYs; however, it showed less susceptibility to interference. Results also demonstrated that low data rate BLE PHYs hindered the LBT throughput performance since they correspond to longer airtime durations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8864548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88645482022-02-23 Wireless Coexistence of Cellular LBT Systems and BLE 5 MUHAMMAD, SIRAJ KALAA, MOHAMAD OMAR AL REFAI, HAZEM H. IEEE Access Article The 2.4 GHz spectrum is home to several Radio Access Technologies (RATs), including ZigBee, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), and Wi-Fi. Accordingly, the technologies’ spectrum-sharing qualities have been extensively studied in literature. License-Assisted Access (LAA) Listen-Before-Talk (LBT) has been identified in technical reports as the foundation for the channel access mechanism for 5G New Radio-Unlicensed (NR-U) operating in the 2.4 GHz Industrial, Scientific, and Medical (ISM) band. The introduction of NR-U into this band raises new concerns regarding coexistence of the newcomer with traditional incumbents. This article reports an investigation of BLE 5 and cellular LBT coexisting systems by means of empirical evaluation. The importance of this study stems from that the studied LBT mechanism is indicative of how 5G NR-U would perform in the 2.4 GHz band. Tests were performed in conformity with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C63.27 standard for evaluation of wireless coexistence, and results were reported in terms of throughput and interframe delays. In accordance with the standard and under different BLE physical layers (PHYs) and LBT priority classes, three setups were investigated. These pertain to the three tiers of evaluation, which correspond to the criticality of the device under test. Results demonstrated how BLE throughput dropped as the intended-to-unintended signal ratio decreased, and LBT classes exhibited a diminishing effect as the class priority descended. Long Range BLE PHY was found to sustain longer gap times (i.e., delay) than the other two PHYs; however, it showed less susceptibility to interference. Results also demonstrated that low data rate BLE PHYs hindered the LBT throughput performance since they correspond to longer airtime durations. 2021 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8864548/ /pubmed/35211362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3056909 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
MUHAMMAD, SIRAJ
KALAA, MOHAMAD OMAR AL
REFAI, HAZEM H.
Wireless Coexistence of Cellular LBT Systems and BLE 5
title Wireless Coexistence of Cellular LBT Systems and BLE 5
title_full Wireless Coexistence of Cellular LBT Systems and BLE 5
title_fullStr Wireless Coexistence of Cellular LBT Systems and BLE 5
title_full_unstemmed Wireless Coexistence of Cellular LBT Systems and BLE 5
title_short Wireless Coexistence of Cellular LBT Systems and BLE 5
title_sort wireless coexistence of cellular lbt systems and ble 5
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35211362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3056909
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadsiraj wirelesscoexistenceofcellularlbtsystemsandble5
AT kalaamohamadomaral wirelesscoexistenceofcellularlbtsystemsandble5
AT refaihazemh wirelesscoexistenceofcellularlbtsystemsandble5