Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of a single maintenance laser treatment for stress urinary incontinence: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single carbon dioxide (CO(2)) laser maintenance treatment in women previously treated successfully with laser for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), who have demonstrated a decline in treatment effect. METHODS: Women aged 40–70 ye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lauterbach, Roy, Aharoni, Saar, Justman, Naphtali, Farago, Naama, Gruenwald, Ilan, Lowenstein, Lior
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35195738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05103-x
_version_ 1784655489402929152
author Lauterbach, Roy
Aharoni, Saar
Justman, Naphtali
Farago, Naama
Gruenwald, Ilan
Lowenstein, Lior
author_facet Lauterbach, Roy
Aharoni, Saar
Justman, Naphtali
Farago, Naama
Gruenwald, Ilan
Lowenstein, Lior
author_sort Lauterbach, Roy
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single carbon dioxide (CO(2)) laser maintenance treatment in women previously treated successfully with laser for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), who have demonstrated a decline in treatment effect. METHODS: Women aged 40–70 years who experienced temporary significant improvement in symptoms following CO(2) laser treatments for SUI were randomized to either the treatment group or the sham treatment control group. Cough test results, 1-h pad weights and scores on the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI6), the International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-UI) and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) were obtained at baseline and 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Of 183 women screened, 131 were included in the final analysis. Demographic characteristics and baseline measures in the outcome tests were similar between the groups. Statistically significant improvements were demonstrated in the study compared to the control group at 3 months post-treatment in positive cough test (44.4% vs. 79.4%, P = 0.002), mean pad weight test (2.3 g ± 1.3 vs. 5.6 ± 1.1, P < 0.001), mean UDI-6(24.7 ± 12.1 vs. 45.1 ± 13.6 SD, P = 0.004), mean ICIQ-UI (16.5 ± 4.3 vs. 10.3 + 3.8, P = 0.003) and mean PISQ-12 (21.3 ± 6.8 vs. 36.6 ± 7.5, P = 0.003). However, values at 6 months post-treatment were similar to those at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a single maintenance laser treatment for reducing symptoms of SUI is transiently effective, well tolerated and safe. This treatment modality provides alternative non-surgical therapy for women with SUI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8864590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88645902022-02-23 The efficacy and safety of a single maintenance laser treatment for stress urinary incontinence: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial Lauterbach, Roy Aharoni, Saar Justman, Naphtali Farago, Naama Gruenwald, Ilan Lowenstein, Lior Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single carbon dioxide (CO(2)) laser maintenance treatment in women previously treated successfully with laser for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), who have demonstrated a decline in treatment effect. METHODS: Women aged 40–70 years who experienced temporary significant improvement in symptoms following CO(2) laser treatments for SUI were randomized to either the treatment group or the sham treatment control group. Cough test results, 1-h pad weights and scores on the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI6), the International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-UI) and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) were obtained at baseline and 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Of 183 women screened, 131 were included in the final analysis. Demographic characteristics and baseline measures in the outcome tests were similar between the groups. Statistically significant improvements were demonstrated in the study compared to the control group at 3 months post-treatment in positive cough test (44.4% vs. 79.4%, P = 0.002), mean pad weight test (2.3 g ± 1.3 vs. 5.6 ± 1.1, P < 0.001), mean UDI-6(24.7 ± 12.1 vs. 45.1 ± 13.6 SD, P = 0.004), mean ICIQ-UI (16.5 ± 4.3 vs. 10.3 + 3.8, P = 0.003) and mean PISQ-12 (21.3 ± 6.8 vs. 36.6 ± 7.5, P = 0.003). However, values at 6 months post-treatment were similar to those at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a single maintenance laser treatment for reducing symptoms of SUI is transiently effective, well tolerated and safe. This treatment modality provides alternative non-surgical therapy for women with SUI. Springer International Publishing 2022-02-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8864590/ /pubmed/35195738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05103-x Text en © The International Urogynecological Association 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lauterbach, Roy
Aharoni, Saar
Justman, Naphtali
Farago, Naama
Gruenwald, Ilan
Lowenstein, Lior
The efficacy and safety of a single maintenance laser treatment for stress urinary incontinence: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
title The efficacy and safety of a single maintenance laser treatment for stress urinary incontinence: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full The efficacy and safety of a single maintenance laser treatment for stress urinary incontinence: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of a single maintenance laser treatment for stress urinary incontinence: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of a single maintenance laser treatment for stress urinary incontinence: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_short The efficacy and safety of a single maintenance laser treatment for stress urinary incontinence: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of a single maintenance laser treatment for stress urinary incontinence: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35195738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05103-x
work_keys_str_mv AT lauterbachroy theefficacyandsafetyofasinglemaintenancelasertreatmentforstressurinaryincontinenceadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aharonisaar theefficacyandsafetyofasinglemaintenancelasertreatmentforstressurinaryincontinenceadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT justmannaphtali theefficacyandsafetyofasinglemaintenancelasertreatmentforstressurinaryincontinenceadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT faragonaama theefficacyandsafetyofasinglemaintenancelasertreatmentforstressurinaryincontinenceadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gruenwaldilan theefficacyandsafetyofasinglemaintenancelasertreatmentforstressurinaryincontinenceadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lowensteinlior theefficacyandsafetyofasinglemaintenancelasertreatmentforstressurinaryincontinenceadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lauterbachroy efficacyandsafetyofasinglemaintenancelasertreatmentforstressurinaryincontinenceadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aharonisaar efficacyandsafetyofasinglemaintenancelasertreatmentforstressurinaryincontinenceadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT justmannaphtali efficacyandsafetyofasinglemaintenancelasertreatmentforstressurinaryincontinenceadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT faragonaama efficacyandsafetyofasinglemaintenancelasertreatmentforstressurinaryincontinenceadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gruenwaldilan efficacyandsafetyofasinglemaintenancelasertreatmentforstressurinaryincontinenceadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lowensteinlior efficacyandsafetyofasinglemaintenancelasertreatmentforstressurinaryincontinenceadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial