Cargando…

Uterine Cavity Irrigation With Office Hysteroscopy During Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: This was a non-blinded randomized controlled study to evaluate whether endometrial irrigation via office hysteroscopy during the early follicular phase would lead to a higher level of live birth rates compared to no irrigation in the fresh embryo transfer cycle. METHOD: The study was cond...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghasemi, Marzieh, Aleyasin, Ashraf, Fatemi, Human M., Ghaemdoust, Faezeh, Shahrakipour, Mahnaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35222267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.778988
_version_ 1784655519148933120
author Ghasemi, Marzieh
Aleyasin, Ashraf
Fatemi, Human M.
Ghaemdoust, Faezeh
Shahrakipour, Mahnaz
author_facet Ghasemi, Marzieh
Aleyasin, Ashraf
Fatemi, Human M.
Ghaemdoust, Faezeh
Shahrakipour, Mahnaz
author_sort Ghasemi, Marzieh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This was a non-blinded randomized controlled study to evaluate whether endometrial irrigation via office hysteroscopy during the early follicular phase would lead to a higher level of live birth rates compared to no irrigation in the fresh embryo transfer cycle. METHOD: The study was conducted in Tehran university of medical sciences from June 2015 to June 2016. women under the age of 40 with primary infertility without history of previous IVF/ICSI or hysteroscopic examination, were included. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was done. Hysteroscopy was performed in the early mid-follicular phase of a stimulation cycle (day 5-7) with a vaginoscopy approach and saline irrigation in hysteroscopy group. Embryo-transfer was done in the same cycle. RESULTS: 228 patients completed their participation in the study. In the fresh cycle, clinical pregnancy rate was 46% in the hysteroscopy group and 40.43% in the control group. (p-value= 0.326, RR= 1.16 [95%CI: 0.862 to 1.56]). Live birth rate was 41.28% in the hysteroscopic group and 31.93% in the control group (p-value=0.143, RR= 1.293 [95%CI: 0.916 to 1.825]). For those patients having surplus cryopreserved embryos, after 2 months, a second embryo transfer was performed. The cumulative LBR was 44.05% in the hysteroscopic group and 32.25% in the control group (p-value=0.029, RR= 1.368 [95%CI: 1.031 to 1.815], RD= 11.9% [95%CI: 1.2% to 22.3%] and NNT= 8 [95%CI: 4 to 85]). CONCLUSION: The current study clearly demonstrated a significantly higher cumulative live birth rate in the intervention group. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: [https://www.irct.ir/trial/19586], identifier IRCT2016011022795N2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8864765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88647652022-02-24 Uterine Cavity Irrigation With Office Hysteroscopy During Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial Ghasemi, Marzieh Aleyasin, Ashraf Fatemi, Human M. Ghaemdoust, Faezeh Shahrakipour, Mahnaz Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: This was a non-blinded randomized controlled study to evaluate whether endometrial irrigation via office hysteroscopy during the early follicular phase would lead to a higher level of live birth rates compared to no irrigation in the fresh embryo transfer cycle. METHOD: The study was conducted in Tehran university of medical sciences from June 2015 to June 2016. women under the age of 40 with primary infertility without history of previous IVF/ICSI or hysteroscopic examination, were included. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was done. Hysteroscopy was performed in the early mid-follicular phase of a stimulation cycle (day 5-7) with a vaginoscopy approach and saline irrigation in hysteroscopy group. Embryo-transfer was done in the same cycle. RESULTS: 228 patients completed their participation in the study. In the fresh cycle, clinical pregnancy rate was 46% in the hysteroscopy group and 40.43% in the control group. (p-value= 0.326, RR= 1.16 [95%CI: 0.862 to 1.56]). Live birth rate was 41.28% in the hysteroscopic group and 31.93% in the control group (p-value=0.143, RR= 1.293 [95%CI: 0.916 to 1.825]). For those patients having surplus cryopreserved embryos, after 2 months, a second embryo transfer was performed. The cumulative LBR was 44.05% in the hysteroscopic group and 32.25% in the control group (p-value=0.029, RR= 1.368 [95%CI: 1.031 to 1.815], RD= 11.9% [95%CI: 1.2% to 22.3%] and NNT= 8 [95%CI: 4 to 85]). CONCLUSION: The current study clearly demonstrated a significantly higher cumulative live birth rate in the intervention group. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: [https://www.irct.ir/trial/19586], identifier IRCT2016011022795N2. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8864765/ /pubmed/35222267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.778988 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ghasemi, Aleyasin, Fatemi, Ghaemdoust and Shahrakipour https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Ghasemi, Marzieh
Aleyasin, Ashraf
Fatemi, Human M.
Ghaemdoust, Faezeh
Shahrakipour, Mahnaz
Uterine Cavity Irrigation With Office Hysteroscopy During Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Uterine Cavity Irrigation With Office Hysteroscopy During Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Uterine Cavity Irrigation With Office Hysteroscopy During Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Uterine Cavity Irrigation With Office Hysteroscopy During Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Uterine Cavity Irrigation With Office Hysteroscopy During Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Uterine Cavity Irrigation With Office Hysteroscopy During Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort uterine cavity irrigation with office hysteroscopy during ovarian stimulation for ivf: a randomized controlled trial
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35222267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.778988
work_keys_str_mv AT ghasemimarzieh uterinecavityirrigationwithofficehysteroscopyduringovarianstimulationforivfarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aleyasinashraf uterinecavityirrigationwithofficehysteroscopyduringovarianstimulationforivfarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fatemihumanm uterinecavityirrigationwithofficehysteroscopyduringovarianstimulationforivfarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ghaemdoustfaezeh uterinecavityirrigationwithofficehysteroscopyduringovarianstimulationforivfarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shahrakipourmahnaz uterinecavityirrigationwithofficehysteroscopyduringovarianstimulationforivfarandomizedcontrolledtrial