Cargando…
Uterine Cavity Irrigation With Office Hysteroscopy During Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE: This was a non-blinded randomized controlled study to evaluate whether endometrial irrigation via office hysteroscopy during the early follicular phase would lead to a higher level of live birth rates compared to no irrigation in the fresh embryo transfer cycle. METHOD: The study was cond...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35222267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.778988 |
_version_ | 1784655519148933120 |
---|---|
author | Ghasemi, Marzieh Aleyasin, Ashraf Fatemi, Human M. Ghaemdoust, Faezeh Shahrakipour, Mahnaz |
author_facet | Ghasemi, Marzieh Aleyasin, Ashraf Fatemi, Human M. Ghaemdoust, Faezeh Shahrakipour, Mahnaz |
author_sort | Ghasemi, Marzieh |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This was a non-blinded randomized controlled study to evaluate whether endometrial irrigation via office hysteroscopy during the early follicular phase would lead to a higher level of live birth rates compared to no irrigation in the fresh embryo transfer cycle. METHOD: The study was conducted in Tehran university of medical sciences from June 2015 to June 2016. women under the age of 40 with primary infertility without history of previous IVF/ICSI or hysteroscopic examination, were included. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was done. Hysteroscopy was performed in the early mid-follicular phase of a stimulation cycle (day 5-7) with a vaginoscopy approach and saline irrigation in hysteroscopy group. Embryo-transfer was done in the same cycle. RESULTS: 228 patients completed their participation in the study. In the fresh cycle, clinical pregnancy rate was 46% in the hysteroscopy group and 40.43% in the control group. (p-value= 0.326, RR= 1.16 [95%CI: 0.862 to 1.56]). Live birth rate was 41.28% in the hysteroscopic group and 31.93% in the control group (p-value=0.143, RR= 1.293 [95%CI: 0.916 to 1.825]). For those patients having surplus cryopreserved embryos, after 2 months, a second embryo transfer was performed. The cumulative LBR was 44.05% in the hysteroscopic group and 32.25% in the control group (p-value=0.029, RR= 1.368 [95%CI: 1.031 to 1.815], RD= 11.9% [95%CI: 1.2% to 22.3%] and NNT= 8 [95%CI: 4 to 85]). CONCLUSION: The current study clearly demonstrated a significantly higher cumulative live birth rate in the intervention group. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: [https://www.irct.ir/trial/19586], identifier IRCT2016011022795N2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8864765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88647652022-02-24 Uterine Cavity Irrigation With Office Hysteroscopy During Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial Ghasemi, Marzieh Aleyasin, Ashraf Fatemi, Human M. Ghaemdoust, Faezeh Shahrakipour, Mahnaz Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: This was a non-blinded randomized controlled study to evaluate whether endometrial irrigation via office hysteroscopy during the early follicular phase would lead to a higher level of live birth rates compared to no irrigation in the fresh embryo transfer cycle. METHOD: The study was conducted in Tehran university of medical sciences from June 2015 to June 2016. women under the age of 40 with primary infertility without history of previous IVF/ICSI or hysteroscopic examination, were included. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was done. Hysteroscopy was performed in the early mid-follicular phase of a stimulation cycle (day 5-7) with a vaginoscopy approach and saline irrigation in hysteroscopy group. Embryo-transfer was done in the same cycle. RESULTS: 228 patients completed their participation in the study. In the fresh cycle, clinical pregnancy rate was 46% in the hysteroscopy group and 40.43% in the control group. (p-value= 0.326, RR= 1.16 [95%CI: 0.862 to 1.56]). Live birth rate was 41.28% in the hysteroscopic group and 31.93% in the control group (p-value=0.143, RR= 1.293 [95%CI: 0.916 to 1.825]). For those patients having surplus cryopreserved embryos, after 2 months, a second embryo transfer was performed. The cumulative LBR was 44.05% in the hysteroscopic group and 32.25% in the control group (p-value=0.029, RR= 1.368 [95%CI: 1.031 to 1.815], RD= 11.9% [95%CI: 1.2% to 22.3%] and NNT= 8 [95%CI: 4 to 85]). CONCLUSION: The current study clearly demonstrated a significantly higher cumulative live birth rate in the intervention group. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: [https://www.irct.ir/trial/19586], identifier IRCT2016011022795N2. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8864765/ /pubmed/35222267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.778988 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ghasemi, Aleyasin, Fatemi, Ghaemdoust and Shahrakipour https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Ghasemi, Marzieh Aleyasin, Ashraf Fatemi, Human M. Ghaemdoust, Faezeh Shahrakipour, Mahnaz Uterine Cavity Irrigation With Office Hysteroscopy During Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Uterine Cavity Irrigation With Office Hysteroscopy During Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Uterine Cavity Irrigation With Office Hysteroscopy During Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Uterine Cavity Irrigation With Office Hysteroscopy During Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Uterine Cavity Irrigation With Office Hysteroscopy During Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Uterine Cavity Irrigation With Office Hysteroscopy During Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | uterine cavity irrigation with office hysteroscopy during ovarian stimulation for ivf: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35222267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.778988 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghasemimarzieh uterinecavityirrigationwithofficehysteroscopyduringovarianstimulationforivfarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT aleyasinashraf uterinecavityirrigationwithofficehysteroscopyduringovarianstimulationforivfarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fatemihumanm uterinecavityirrigationwithofficehysteroscopyduringovarianstimulationforivfarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ghaemdoustfaezeh uterinecavityirrigationwithofficehysteroscopyduringovarianstimulationforivfarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shahrakipourmahnaz uterinecavityirrigationwithofficehysteroscopyduringovarianstimulationforivfarandomizedcontrolledtrial |