Cargando…

Acceptability of the Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial intervention: a qualitative study of perspectives of young people and school staff

BACKGROUND: The Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial is investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a multi-component behaviour change intervention to reduce the prevalence of dental caries in young people from deprived areas aged 11–13 years. Mobile health has gained popular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elyousfi, Sarab, Innes, Nicola, Leggett, Heather, Ainsworth, Hannah, Chestnutt, Ivor G., Day, Peter, Robertson, Mark, Pavitt, Sue, Kellar, Ian, Dey, Donna, Marshman, Zoe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35197021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02073-w
_version_ 1784655521143324672
author Elyousfi, Sarab
Innes, Nicola
Leggett, Heather
Ainsworth, Hannah
Chestnutt, Ivor G.
Day, Peter
Robertson, Mark
Pavitt, Sue
Kellar, Ian
Dey, Donna
Marshman, Zoe
author_facet Elyousfi, Sarab
Innes, Nicola
Leggett, Heather
Ainsworth, Hannah
Chestnutt, Ivor G.
Day, Peter
Robertson, Mark
Pavitt, Sue
Kellar, Ian
Dey, Donna
Marshman, Zoe
author_sort Elyousfi, Sarab
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial is investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a multi-component behaviour change intervention to reduce the prevalence of dental caries in young people from deprived areas aged 11–13 years. Mobile health has gained popularity in delivering behaviour change interventions for improving oral health. The intervention, based on behaviour change theory, consists of two components; a single classroom-based session embedded in the school curriculum and a series of follow-up text messages (SMS) delivered twice daily to participants. This element of the process evaluation aimed to explore the acceptability of the BRIGHT intervention for pupils and school staff. METHODS: Qualitative study, based on the concept of acceptability. Focus groups were conducted with 50 pupils, from six secondary schools across the UK, who had received the intervention. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 members of staff. Purposive maximum variation sampling was used. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework approach. RESULTS: In line with the theoretical framework of acceptability, affective attitude, perceived effectiveness, ethicality, burden and self-efficacy were identified as factors that affect the acceptability of the BRIGHT intervention. Pupil participants appreciated learning about the consequences of inadequate brushing particularly the photographs of carious teeth during the classroom-based session. More detailed information on brushing techniques and follow-up lessons on oral health were recommended by pupils. In terms of the SMS, the data suggest that pupil participants found them to be helpful reminders for brushing their teeth. To further improve acceptability, more choice over the timing of the messages and greater interactivity to reduce tedium were suggested. Staff participants recognised the value of the lesson and reported that in general the content was suitable for their pupils. Having the lesson material prepared for them, having the necessary support and whether it was included in the curriculum, were factors that improved acceptability. CONCLUSION: Overall, pupils and staff found the BRIGHT intervention acceptable and made some suggestions which could be adopted in any subsequent implementation of the intervention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02073-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8864777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88647772022-02-23 Acceptability of the Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial intervention: a qualitative study of perspectives of young people and school staff Elyousfi, Sarab Innes, Nicola Leggett, Heather Ainsworth, Hannah Chestnutt, Ivor G. Day, Peter Robertson, Mark Pavitt, Sue Kellar, Ian Dey, Donna Marshman, Zoe BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: The Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial is investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a multi-component behaviour change intervention to reduce the prevalence of dental caries in young people from deprived areas aged 11–13 years. Mobile health has gained popularity in delivering behaviour change interventions for improving oral health. The intervention, based on behaviour change theory, consists of two components; a single classroom-based session embedded in the school curriculum and a series of follow-up text messages (SMS) delivered twice daily to participants. This element of the process evaluation aimed to explore the acceptability of the BRIGHT intervention for pupils and school staff. METHODS: Qualitative study, based on the concept of acceptability. Focus groups were conducted with 50 pupils, from six secondary schools across the UK, who had received the intervention. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 members of staff. Purposive maximum variation sampling was used. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework approach. RESULTS: In line with the theoretical framework of acceptability, affective attitude, perceived effectiveness, ethicality, burden and self-efficacy were identified as factors that affect the acceptability of the BRIGHT intervention. Pupil participants appreciated learning about the consequences of inadequate brushing particularly the photographs of carious teeth during the classroom-based session. More detailed information on brushing techniques and follow-up lessons on oral health were recommended by pupils. In terms of the SMS, the data suggest that pupil participants found them to be helpful reminders for brushing their teeth. To further improve acceptability, more choice over the timing of the messages and greater interactivity to reduce tedium were suggested. Staff participants recognised the value of the lesson and reported that in general the content was suitable for their pupils. Having the lesson material prepared for them, having the necessary support and whether it was included in the curriculum, were factors that improved acceptability. CONCLUSION: Overall, pupils and staff found the BRIGHT intervention acceptable and made some suggestions which could be adopted in any subsequent implementation of the intervention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02073-w. BioMed Central 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8864777/ /pubmed/35197021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02073-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Elyousfi, Sarab
Innes, Nicola
Leggett, Heather
Ainsworth, Hannah
Chestnutt, Ivor G.
Day, Peter
Robertson, Mark
Pavitt, Sue
Kellar, Ian
Dey, Donna
Marshman, Zoe
Acceptability of the Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial intervention: a qualitative study of perspectives of young people and school staff
title Acceptability of the Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial intervention: a qualitative study of perspectives of young people and school staff
title_full Acceptability of the Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial intervention: a qualitative study of perspectives of young people and school staff
title_fullStr Acceptability of the Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial intervention: a qualitative study of perspectives of young people and school staff
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability of the Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial intervention: a qualitative study of perspectives of young people and school staff
title_short Acceptability of the Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial intervention: a qualitative study of perspectives of young people and school staff
title_sort acceptability of the brushing reminder 4 good oral health (bright) trial intervention: a qualitative study of perspectives of young people and school staff
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35197021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02073-w
work_keys_str_mv AT elyousfisarab acceptabilityofthebrushingreminder4goodoralhealthbrighttrialinterventionaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofyoungpeopleandschoolstaff
AT innesnicola acceptabilityofthebrushingreminder4goodoralhealthbrighttrialinterventionaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofyoungpeopleandschoolstaff
AT leggettheather acceptabilityofthebrushingreminder4goodoralhealthbrighttrialinterventionaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofyoungpeopleandschoolstaff
AT ainsworthhannah acceptabilityofthebrushingreminder4goodoralhealthbrighttrialinterventionaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofyoungpeopleandschoolstaff
AT chestnuttivorg acceptabilityofthebrushingreminder4goodoralhealthbrighttrialinterventionaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofyoungpeopleandschoolstaff
AT daypeter acceptabilityofthebrushingreminder4goodoralhealthbrighttrialinterventionaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofyoungpeopleandschoolstaff
AT robertsonmark acceptabilityofthebrushingreminder4goodoralhealthbrighttrialinterventionaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofyoungpeopleandschoolstaff
AT pavittsue acceptabilityofthebrushingreminder4goodoralhealthbrighttrialinterventionaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofyoungpeopleandschoolstaff
AT kellarian acceptabilityofthebrushingreminder4goodoralhealthbrighttrialinterventionaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofyoungpeopleandschoolstaff
AT deydonna acceptabilityofthebrushingreminder4goodoralhealthbrighttrialinterventionaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofyoungpeopleandschoolstaff
AT marshmanzoe acceptabilityofthebrushingreminder4goodoralhealthbrighttrialinterventionaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofyoungpeopleandschoolstaff