Cargando…
Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol
BACKGROUND: Biportal endoscopic surgery has recently been performed in lumbar discectomy, with advantages over conventional surgery, such as less skin scarring and muscle damage. However, the clinical results have not been established. Although previous studies reported no difference between the bip...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06094-2 |
_version_ | 1784655522882912256 |
---|---|
author | Park, Sang-Min Song, Kwang-Sup Kim, Ho-Joong Park, Si-Young Kang, Taewook Kang, Min-Seok Heo, Dong Hwa Park, Choon Keun Lee, Dong-Geun Hwang, Jin Sub Jang, Jae-Won Kim, Jun Young Kim, Jin-Sung Lee, Hong-Jae You, Ki-Han Park, Hyun-Jin |
author_facet | Park, Sang-Min Song, Kwang-Sup Kim, Ho-Joong Park, Si-Young Kang, Taewook Kang, Min-Seok Heo, Dong Hwa Park, Choon Keun Lee, Dong-Geun Hwang, Jin Sub Jang, Jae-Won Kim, Jun Young Kim, Jin-Sung Lee, Hong-Jae You, Ki-Han Park, Hyun-Jin |
author_sort | Park, Sang-Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Biportal endoscopic surgery has recently been performed in lumbar discectomy, with advantages over conventional surgery, such as less skin scarring and muscle damage. However, the clinical results have not been established. Although previous studies reported no difference between the biportal endoscopic and microscopic discectomy clinical results, the evidence was weak. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the biportal endoscopic discectomy versus the microscopic discectomy. METHODS: This prospective multicenter randomized controlled equivalence trial is designed to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of patients who underwent lumbar discectomy using biportal endoscopy or microscopy. We will include 100 participants (50 per group) with a lumbar herniated disc. The primary outcome will be the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score 12 months after surgery based on a modified intention-to-treat strategy. The secondary outcomes will include the visual analog scale score for low back and lower extremity radiating pain, the ODI score, the Euro-Qol-5-Dimensions score, surgery satisfaction, walking time, postoperative return to daily life period, postoperative surgical scar, and surgery-related variables, such as postoperative drainage, operation time, admission duration, postoperative creatine kinase, and implementation status of conversion to open surgery. Radiographic outcomes will also be analyzed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) and simple radiographs. Safety will be assessed by evaluating all adverse and severe adverse events and surgery-related effects. The participants will be assessed by a blinded assessor before surgery (baseline) and 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. DISCUSSION: This trial will be the first prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to analyze the efficacy and safety of biportal endoscopic discectomy in lumbar herniated disc. This trial is designed for evaluating the equivalence of the results between biportal endoscopic and microscopic discectomy including adequate sample size, blinded analyses, and prospective registration to reduce bias. This trial will provide enough data on the effectiveness and safety of biportal endoscopic surgery and will be an important study that allows clear conclusions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service (cris.nih.go.kr.) (KCT0006191). Registered on 27 March 2021 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8864786 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88647862022-02-23 Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol Park, Sang-Min Song, Kwang-Sup Kim, Ho-Joong Park, Si-Young Kang, Taewook Kang, Min-Seok Heo, Dong Hwa Park, Choon Keun Lee, Dong-Geun Hwang, Jin Sub Jang, Jae-Won Kim, Jun Young Kim, Jin-Sung Lee, Hong-Jae You, Ki-Han Park, Hyun-Jin Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Biportal endoscopic surgery has recently been performed in lumbar discectomy, with advantages over conventional surgery, such as less skin scarring and muscle damage. However, the clinical results have not been established. Although previous studies reported no difference between the biportal endoscopic and microscopic discectomy clinical results, the evidence was weak. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the biportal endoscopic discectomy versus the microscopic discectomy. METHODS: This prospective multicenter randomized controlled equivalence trial is designed to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of patients who underwent lumbar discectomy using biportal endoscopy or microscopy. We will include 100 participants (50 per group) with a lumbar herniated disc. The primary outcome will be the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score 12 months after surgery based on a modified intention-to-treat strategy. The secondary outcomes will include the visual analog scale score for low back and lower extremity radiating pain, the ODI score, the Euro-Qol-5-Dimensions score, surgery satisfaction, walking time, postoperative return to daily life period, postoperative surgical scar, and surgery-related variables, such as postoperative drainage, operation time, admission duration, postoperative creatine kinase, and implementation status of conversion to open surgery. Radiographic outcomes will also be analyzed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) and simple radiographs. Safety will be assessed by evaluating all adverse and severe adverse events and surgery-related effects. The participants will be assessed by a blinded assessor before surgery (baseline) and 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. DISCUSSION: This trial will be the first prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to analyze the efficacy and safety of biportal endoscopic discectomy in lumbar herniated disc. This trial is designed for evaluating the equivalence of the results between biportal endoscopic and microscopic discectomy including adequate sample size, blinded analyses, and prospective registration to reduce bias. This trial will provide enough data on the effectiveness and safety of biportal endoscopic surgery and will be an important study that allows clear conclusions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service (cris.nih.go.kr.) (KCT0006191). Registered on 27 March 2021 BioMed Central 2022-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8864786/ /pubmed/35193640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06094-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Park, Sang-Min Song, Kwang-Sup Kim, Ho-Joong Park, Si-Young Kang, Taewook Kang, Min-Seok Heo, Dong Hwa Park, Choon Keun Lee, Dong-Geun Hwang, Jin Sub Jang, Jae-Won Kim, Jun Young Kim, Jin-Sung Lee, Hong-Jae You, Ki-Han Park, Hyun-Jin Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol |
title | Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol |
title_full | Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol |
title_fullStr | Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol |
title_short | Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol |
title_sort | comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (endo-bh trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06094-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parksangmin comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol AT songkwangsup comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol AT kimhojoong comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol AT parksiyoung comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol AT kangtaewook comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol AT kangminseok comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol AT heodonghwa comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol AT parkchoonkeun comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol AT leedonggeun comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol AT hwangjinsub comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol AT jangjaewon comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol AT kimjunyoung comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol AT kimjinsung comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol AT leehongjae comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol AT youkihan comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol AT parkhyunjin comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol |