Cargando…

Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol

BACKGROUND: Biportal endoscopic surgery has recently been performed in lumbar discectomy, with advantages over conventional surgery, such as less skin scarring and muscle damage. However, the clinical results have not been established. Although previous studies reported no difference between the bip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Sang-Min, Song, Kwang-Sup, Kim, Ho-Joong, Park, Si-Young, Kang, Taewook, Kang, Min-Seok, Heo, Dong Hwa, Park, Choon Keun, Lee, Dong-Geun, Hwang, Jin Sub, Jang, Jae-Won, Kim, Jun Young, Kim, Jin-Sung, Lee, Hong-Jae, You, Ki-Han, Park, Hyun-Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06094-2
_version_ 1784655522882912256
author Park, Sang-Min
Song, Kwang-Sup
Kim, Ho-Joong
Park, Si-Young
Kang, Taewook
Kang, Min-Seok
Heo, Dong Hwa
Park, Choon Keun
Lee, Dong-Geun
Hwang, Jin Sub
Jang, Jae-Won
Kim, Jun Young
Kim, Jin-Sung
Lee, Hong-Jae
You, Ki-Han
Park, Hyun-Jin
author_facet Park, Sang-Min
Song, Kwang-Sup
Kim, Ho-Joong
Park, Si-Young
Kang, Taewook
Kang, Min-Seok
Heo, Dong Hwa
Park, Choon Keun
Lee, Dong-Geun
Hwang, Jin Sub
Jang, Jae-Won
Kim, Jun Young
Kim, Jin-Sung
Lee, Hong-Jae
You, Ki-Han
Park, Hyun-Jin
author_sort Park, Sang-Min
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biportal endoscopic surgery has recently been performed in lumbar discectomy, with advantages over conventional surgery, such as less skin scarring and muscle damage. However, the clinical results have not been established. Although previous studies reported no difference between the biportal endoscopic and microscopic discectomy clinical results, the evidence was weak. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the biportal endoscopic discectomy versus the microscopic discectomy. METHODS: This prospective multicenter randomized controlled equivalence trial is designed to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of patients who underwent lumbar discectomy using biportal endoscopy or microscopy. We will include 100 participants (50 per group) with a lumbar herniated disc. The primary outcome will be the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score 12 months after surgery based on a modified intention-to-treat strategy. The secondary outcomes will include the visual analog scale score for low back and lower extremity radiating pain, the ODI score, the Euro-Qol-5-Dimensions score, surgery satisfaction, walking time, postoperative return to daily life period, postoperative surgical scar, and surgery-related variables, such as postoperative drainage, operation time, admission duration, postoperative creatine kinase, and implementation status of conversion to open surgery. Radiographic outcomes will also be analyzed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) and simple radiographs. Safety will be assessed by evaluating all adverse and severe adverse events and surgery-related effects. The participants will be assessed by a blinded assessor before surgery (baseline) and 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. DISCUSSION: This trial will be the first prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to analyze the efficacy and safety of biportal endoscopic discectomy in lumbar herniated disc. This trial is designed for evaluating the equivalence of the results between biportal endoscopic and microscopic discectomy including adequate sample size, blinded analyses, and prospective registration to reduce bias. This trial will provide enough data on the effectiveness and safety of biportal endoscopic surgery and will be an important study that allows clear conclusions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service (cris.nih.go.kr.) (KCT0006191). Registered on 27 March 2021
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8864786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88647862022-02-23 Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol Park, Sang-Min Song, Kwang-Sup Kim, Ho-Joong Park, Si-Young Kang, Taewook Kang, Min-Seok Heo, Dong Hwa Park, Choon Keun Lee, Dong-Geun Hwang, Jin Sub Jang, Jae-Won Kim, Jun Young Kim, Jin-Sung Lee, Hong-Jae You, Ki-Han Park, Hyun-Jin Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Biportal endoscopic surgery has recently been performed in lumbar discectomy, with advantages over conventional surgery, such as less skin scarring and muscle damage. However, the clinical results have not been established. Although previous studies reported no difference between the biportal endoscopic and microscopic discectomy clinical results, the evidence was weak. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the biportal endoscopic discectomy versus the microscopic discectomy. METHODS: This prospective multicenter randomized controlled equivalence trial is designed to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of patients who underwent lumbar discectomy using biportal endoscopy or microscopy. We will include 100 participants (50 per group) with a lumbar herniated disc. The primary outcome will be the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score 12 months after surgery based on a modified intention-to-treat strategy. The secondary outcomes will include the visual analog scale score for low back and lower extremity radiating pain, the ODI score, the Euro-Qol-5-Dimensions score, surgery satisfaction, walking time, postoperative return to daily life period, postoperative surgical scar, and surgery-related variables, such as postoperative drainage, operation time, admission duration, postoperative creatine kinase, and implementation status of conversion to open surgery. Radiographic outcomes will also be analyzed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) and simple radiographs. Safety will be assessed by evaluating all adverse and severe adverse events and surgery-related effects. The participants will be assessed by a blinded assessor before surgery (baseline) and 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. DISCUSSION: This trial will be the first prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to analyze the efficacy and safety of biportal endoscopic discectomy in lumbar herniated disc. This trial is designed for evaluating the equivalence of the results between biportal endoscopic and microscopic discectomy including adequate sample size, blinded analyses, and prospective registration to reduce bias. This trial will provide enough data on the effectiveness and safety of biportal endoscopic surgery and will be an important study that allows clear conclusions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service (cris.nih.go.kr.) (KCT0006191). Registered on 27 March 2021 BioMed Central 2022-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8864786/ /pubmed/35193640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06094-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Park, Sang-Min
Song, Kwang-Sup
Kim, Ho-Joong
Park, Si-Young
Kang, Taewook
Kang, Min-Seok
Heo, Dong Hwa
Park, Choon Keun
Lee, Dong-Geun
Hwang, Jin Sub
Jang, Jae-Won
Kim, Jun Young
Kim, Jin-Sung
Lee, Hong-Jae
You, Ki-Han
Park, Hyun-Jin
Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol
title Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol
title_full Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol
title_fullStr Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol
title_short Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol
title_sort comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (endo-bh trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06094-2
work_keys_str_mv AT parksangmin comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol
AT songkwangsup comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol
AT kimhojoong comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol
AT parksiyoung comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol
AT kangtaewook comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol
AT kangminseok comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol
AT heodonghwa comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol
AT parkchoonkeun comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol
AT leedonggeun comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol
AT hwangjinsub comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol
AT jangjaewon comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol
AT kimjunyoung comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol
AT kimjinsung comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol
AT leehongjae comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol
AT youkihan comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol
AT parkhyunjin comparingtheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasivebiportalendoscopicspinesurgeryversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendobhtrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialstudyprotocol