Cargando…

Comparison of monoplanar and polyaxial screw fixation systems in percutaneous intermediate fixation for thoracolumbar fractures

BACKGROUND: The newly developed monoplanar pedicle screws (MPPSs) can mobile in axial plane but fixed in the sagittal plane, which holds potential to combine ease of rod placement with sagittal plane strength theoretically. So far, few clinical studies focused on the outcomes of MPPSs for treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Liangliang, Xiong, Chengjie, Guo, Zhongyi, Yu, Qiuyu, Xu, Feng, Kang, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05129-8
_version_ 1784655533819559936
author Huang, Liangliang
Xiong, Chengjie
Guo, Zhongyi
Yu, Qiuyu
Xu, Feng
Kang, Hui
author_facet Huang, Liangliang
Xiong, Chengjie
Guo, Zhongyi
Yu, Qiuyu
Xu, Feng
Kang, Hui
author_sort Huang, Liangliang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The newly developed monoplanar pedicle screws (MPPSs) can mobile in axial plane but fixed in the sagittal plane, which holds potential to combine ease of rod placement with sagittal plane strength theoretically. So far, few clinical studies focused on the outcomes of MPPSs for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures (TLFs). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of MPPSs to polyaxial pedicle screws (PAPSs) in percutaneous intermediate fixation of TLFs. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients who sustained TLFs without neurological deficits and underwent percutaneous intermediate fixation using MPPSs (40 patients) or PAPSs (38 patients) with a minimum 1-year follow-up were included in this study. The operation time, blood loss, local Cobb angle (LCA), vertebral wedge angle (VWA), anterior body height ratio (ABHR), visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were collected. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, operation time or blood loss between the two groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative LCA, VWA and ABHR were significantly corrected compared to these parameters preoperatively in both groups ((#)P < 0.05). The postoperative LCA, VWA and ABHR in the MPPS group were significantly better corrected than those in the PAPS group (*P < 0.05). Furthermore, the correction loss of LCA, VWA and ABHR in the MPPS group was significantly lower than that in the PAPS group (*P < 0.05). However, no significant difference in VAS and ODI scores was observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: MPPSs showed similar efficiency as PAPSs in percutaneous intermediate fixation surgical procedures. More importantly, MPPSs achieved better radiological performance than PAPSs in the correction of TLFs and the prevention of correction loss. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05129-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8864839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88648392022-02-23 Comparison of monoplanar and polyaxial screw fixation systems in percutaneous intermediate fixation for thoracolumbar fractures Huang, Liangliang Xiong, Chengjie Guo, Zhongyi Yu, Qiuyu Xu, Feng Kang, Hui BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The newly developed monoplanar pedicle screws (MPPSs) can mobile in axial plane but fixed in the sagittal plane, which holds potential to combine ease of rod placement with sagittal plane strength theoretically. So far, few clinical studies focused on the outcomes of MPPSs for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures (TLFs). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of MPPSs to polyaxial pedicle screws (PAPSs) in percutaneous intermediate fixation of TLFs. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients who sustained TLFs without neurological deficits and underwent percutaneous intermediate fixation using MPPSs (40 patients) or PAPSs (38 patients) with a minimum 1-year follow-up were included in this study. The operation time, blood loss, local Cobb angle (LCA), vertebral wedge angle (VWA), anterior body height ratio (ABHR), visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were collected. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, operation time or blood loss between the two groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative LCA, VWA and ABHR were significantly corrected compared to these parameters preoperatively in both groups ((#)P < 0.05). The postoperative LCA, VWA and ABHR in the MPPS group were significantly better corrected than those in the PAPS group (*P < 0.05). Furthermore, the correction loss of LCA, VWA and ABHR in the MPPS group was significantly lower than that in the PAPS group (*P < 0.05). However, no significant difference in VAS and ODI scores was observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: MPPSs showed similar efficiency as PAPSs in percutaneous intermediate fixation surgical procedures. More importantly, MPPSs achieved better radiological performance than PAPSs in the correction of TLFs and the prevention of correction loss. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05129-8. BioMed Central 2022-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8864839/ /pubmed/35193535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05129-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huang, Liangliang
Xiong, Chengjie
Guo, Zhongyi
Yu, Qiuyu
Xu, Feng
Kang, Hui
Comparison of monoplanar and polyaxial screw fixation systems in percutaneous intermediate fixation for thoracolumbar fractures
title Comparison of monoplanar and polyaxial screw fixation systems in percutaneous intermediate fixation for thoracolumbar fractures
title_full Comparison of monoplanar and polyaxial screw fixation systems in percutaneous intermediate fixation for thoracolumbar fractures
title_fullStr Comparison of monoplanar and polyaxial screw fixation systems in percutaneous intermediate fixation for thoracolumbar fractures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of monoplanar and polyaxial screw fixation systems in percutaneous intermediate fixation for thoracolumbar fractures
title_short Comparison of monoplanar and polyaxial screw fixation systems in percutaneous intermediate fixation for thoracolumbar fractures
title_sort comparison of monoplanar and polyaxial screw fixation systems in percutaneous intermediate fixation for thoracolumbar fractures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05129-8
work_keys_str_mv AT huangliangliang comparisonofmonoplanarandpolyaxialscrewfixationsystemsinpercutaneousintermediatefixationforthoracolumbarfractures
AT xiongchengjie comparisonofmonoplanarandpolyaxialscrewfixationsystemsinpercutaneousintermediatefixationforthoracolumbarfractures
AT guozhongyi comparisonofmonoplanarandpolyaxialscrewfixationsystemsinpercutaneousintermediatefixationforthoracolumbarfractures
AT yuqiuyu comparisonofmonoplanarandpolyaxialscrewfixationsystemsinpercutaneousintermediatefixationforthoracolumbarfractures
AT xufeng comparisonofmonoplanarandpolyaxialscrewfixationsystemsinpercutaneousintermediatefixationforthoracolumbarfractures
AT kanghui comparisonofmonoplanarandpolyaxialscrewfixationsystemsinpercutaneousintermediatefixationforthoracolumbarfractures