Cargando…

Comparison of chromosomal status in reserved multiple displacement amplification products of embryos that resulted in miscarriages or live births: a blinded, nonselection case–control study

OBJECTIVE: To analyze chromosomal status in reserved multiple displacement amplification (MDA) products of embryos that result in miscarriages or live births. METHODS: Patients who underwent preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-Ms) without aneuploidy screening were included....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Guoxia, Xu, Yan, Zeng, Yanhong, Guo, Jing, Pan, Jiafu, Zhou, Canquan, Xu, Yanwen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35197054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-022-01187-y
_version_ 1784655546565001216
author Yang, Guoxia
Xu, Yan
Zeng, Yanhong
Guo, Jing
Pan, Jiafu
Zhou, Canquan
Xu, Yanwen
author_facet Yang, Guoxia
Xu, Yan
Zeng, Yanhong
Guo, Jing
Pan, Jiafu
Zhou, Canquan
Xu, Yanwen
author_sort Yang, Guoxia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze chromosomal status in reserved multiple displacement amplification (MDA) products of embryos that result in miscarriages or live births. METHODS: Patients who underwent preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-Ms) without aneuploidy screening were included. The case group included 28 cycles that resulted in miscarriages. Controls included 56 cycles with live births. Comprehensive chromosomal screening (CCS) using next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on reserved MDA products from previous blastocyst trophectoderm biopsies. The incidence and type of chromosomal abnormalities in embryos resulting in miscarriages or live births were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 28 embryos resulting in miscarriages in the case group, the rate of chromosomal abnormalities was 53.6%, which was significantly greater than 14.3% for those resulting in live births in control group (P < 0.001). Whole-chromosome aneuploidy was not found in the control group but was noted in 25.0% of embryos in the case group. Although the rates of segmental abnormality and mosaicism were also greater in the case group, no significant differences were detected. One chaotic embryo in the control group progressed to live birth. CONCLUSION: Chromosomal abnormalities were the main reason leading to early pregnancy loss. However, abnormalities, such as segmental aneuploidy and mosaicism, should be managed cautiously, considering their undermined reproductive potential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8864905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88649052022-02-28 Comparison of chromosomal status in reserved multiple displacement amplification products of embryos that resulted in miscarriages or live births: a blinded, nonselection case–control study Yang, Guoxia Xu, Yan Zeng, Yanhong Guo, Jing Pan, Jiafu Zhou, Canquan Xu, Yanwen BMC Med Genomics Research OBJECTIVE: To analyze chromosomal status in reserved multiple displacement amplification (MDA) products of embryos that result in miscarriages or live births. METHODS: Patients who underwent preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-Ms) without aneuploidy screening were included. The case group included 28 cycles that resulted in miscarriages. Controls included 56 cycles with live births. Comprehensive chromosomal screening (CCS) using next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on reserved MDA products from previous blastocyst trophectoderm biopsies. The incidence and type of chromosomal abnormalities in embryos resulting in miscarriages or live births were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 28 embryos resulting in miscarriages in the case group, the rate of chromosomal abnormalities was 53.6%, which was significantly greater than 14.3% for those resulting in live births in control group (P < 0.001). Whole-chromosome aneuploidy was not found in the control group but was noted in 25.0% of embryos in the case group. Although the rates of segmental abnormality and mosaicism were also greater in the case group, no significant differences were detected. One chaotic embryo in the control group progressed to live birth. CONCLUSION: Chromosomal abnormalities were the main reason leading to early pregnancy loss. However, abnormalities, such as segmental aneuploidy and mosaicism, should be managed cautiously, considering their undermined reproductive potential. BioMed Central 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8864905/ /pubmed/35197054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-022-01187-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yang, Guoxia
Xu, Yan
Zeng, Yanhong
Guo, Jing
Pan, Jiafu
Zhou, Canquan
Xu, Yanwen
Comparison of chromosomal status in reserved multiple displacement amplification products of embryos that resulted in miscarriages or live births: a blinded, nonselection case–control study
title Comparison of chromosomal status in reserved multiple displacement amplification products of embryos that resulted in miscarriages or live births: a blinded, nonselection case–control study
title_full Comparison of chromosomal status in reserved multiple displacement amplification products of embryos that resulted in miscarriages or live births: a blinded, nonselection case–control study
title_fullStr Comparison of chromosomal status in reserved multiple displacement amplification products of embryos that resulted in miscarriages or live births: a blinded, nonselection case–control study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of chromosomal status in reserved multiple displacement amplification products of embryos that resulted in miscarriages or live births: a blinded, nonselection case–control study
title_short Comparison of chromosomal status in reserved multiple displacement amplification products of embryos that resulted in miscarriages or live births: a blinded, nonselection case–control study
title_sort comparison of chromosomal status in reserved multiple displacement amplification products of embryos that resulted in miscarriages or live births: a blinded, nonselection case–control study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35197054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-022-01187-y
work_keys_str_mv AT yangguoxia comparisonofchromosomalstatusinreservedmultipledisplacementamplificationproductsofembryosthatresultedinmiscarriagesorlivebirthsablindednonselectioncasecontrolstudy
AT xuyan comparisonofchromosomalstatusinreservedmultipledisplacementamplificationproductsofembryosthatresultedinmiscarriagesorlivebirthsablindednonselectioncasecontrolstudy
AT zengyanhong comparisonofchromosomalstatusinreservedmultipledisplacementamplificationproductsofembryosthatresultedinmiscarriagesorlivebirthsablindednonselectioncasecontrolstudy
AT guojing comparisonofchromosomalstatusinreservedmultipledisplacementamplificationproductsofembryosthatresultedinmiscarriagesorlivebirthsablindednonselectioncasecontrolstudy
AT panjiafu comparisonofchromosomalstatusinreservedmultipledisplacementamplificationproductsofembryosthatresultedinmiscarriagesorlivebirthsablindednonselectioncasecontrolstudy
AT zhoucanquan comparisonofchromosomalstatusinreservedmultipledisplacementamplificationproductsofembryosthatresultedinmiscarriagesorlivebirthsablindednonselectioncasecontrolstudy
AT xuyanwen comparisonofchromosomalstatusinreservedmultipledisplacementamplificationproductsofembryosthatresultedinmiscarriagesorlivebirthsablindednonselectioncasecontrolstudy