Cargando…
Hand hygiene with hand sanitizer versus handwashing: what are the planetary health consequences?
In order to reduce the transmission of pathogens, and COVID-19, WHO and NHS England recommend hand washing (HW) and/or the use of hand sanitizer (HS). The planetary health consequences of these different methods of hand hygiene have not been quantified. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35199264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18918-4 |
_version_ | 1784655599216099328 |
---|---|
author | Duane, Brett Pilling, Jessica Saget, Sophie Ashley, Paul Pinhas, Allan R. Lyne, Alexandra |
author_facet | Duane, Brett Pilling, Jessica Saget, Sophie Ashley, Paul Pinhas, Allan R. Lyne, Alexandra |
author_sort | Duane, Brett |
collection | PubMed |
description | In order to reduce the transmission of pathogens, and COVID-19, WHO and NHS England recommend hand washing (HW) and/or the use of hand sanitizer (HS). The planetary health consequences of these different methods of hand hygiene have not been quantified. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) was carried out to compare the environmental impact of the UK population practising increased levels of hand hygiene during the COVID-19 pandemic for 1 year. Washing hands with soap and water was compared to using hand sanitizer (both ethanol and isopropanol based sanitizers were studied). The isopropanol-based HS had the lowest environmental impact in 14 out of the 16 impact categories used in this study. For climate change, hand hygiene using isopropanol HS produced the equivalent of 1060 million kg CO(2), compared to 1460 million for ethanol HS, 2300 million for bar soap HW, and 4240 million for liquid soap HW. For both the ethanol and isopropanol HS, the active ingredient was the greatest overall contributing factor to the environmental impact (83.24% and 68.68% respectively). For HW with liquid soap and bar soap, there were additional contributing factors other than the soap itself: for example tap water use (28.12% and 48.68% respectively) and the laundering of a hand towel to dry the hands (10.17% and 17.92% respectively). All forms of hand hygiene have an environmental cost, and this needs to be weighed up against the health benefits of preventing disease transmission. When comparing hand sanitizers to handwashing with soap and water, this study found that using isopropanol based hand sanitizer is better for planetary health. However, no method of hand hygiene was ideal; isopropanol had a greater fossil fuel resource use than ethanol based hand sanitizer. More research is needed to find hand hygiene sources which do not diminish planetary health, and environmental impact is a consideration for public health campaigns around hand hygiene. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11356-022-18918-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8865176 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88651762022-02-24 Hand hygiene with hand sanitizer versus handwashing: what are the planetary health consequences? Duane, Brett Pilling, Jessica Saget, Sophie Ashley, Paul Pinhas, Allan R. Lyne, Alexandra Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Research Article In order to reduce the transmission of pathogens, and COVID-19, WHO and NHS England recommend hand washing (HW) and/or the use of hand sanitizer (HS). The planetary health consequences of these different methods of hand hygiene have not been quantified. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) was carried out to compare the environmental impact of the UK population practising increased levels of hand hygiene during the COVID-19 pandemic for 1 year. Washing hands with soap and water was compared to using hand sanitizer (both ethanol and isopropanol based sanitizers were studied). The isopropanol-based HS had the lowest environmental impact in 14 out of the 16 impact categories used in this study. For climate change, hand hygiene using isopropanol HS produced the equivalent of 1060 million kg CO(2), compared to 1460 million for ethanol HS, 2300 million for bar soap HW, and 4240 million for liquid soap HW. For both the ethanol and isopropanol HS, the active ingredient was the greatest overall contributing factor to the environmental impact (83.24% and 68.68% respectively). For HW with liquid soap and bar soap, there were additional contributing factors other than the soap itself: for example tap water use (28.12% and 48.68% respectively) and the laundering of a hand towel to dry the hands (10.17% and 17.92% respectively). All forms of hand hygiene have an environmental cost, and this needs to be weighed up against the health benefits of preventing disease transmission. When comparing hand sanitizers to handwashing with soap and water, this study found that using isopropanol based hand sanitizer is better for planetary health. However, no method of hand hygiene was ideal; isopropanol had a greater fossil fuel resource use than ethanol based hand sanitizer. More research is needed to find hand hygiene sources which do not diminish planetary health, and environmental impact is a consideration for public health campaigns around hand hygiene. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11356-022-18918-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8865176/ /pubmed/35199264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18918-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Duane, Brett Pilling, Jessica Saget, Sophie Ashley, Paul Pinhas, Allan R. Lyne, Alexandra Hand hygiene with hand sanitizer versus handwashing: what are the planetary health consequences? |
title | Hand hygiene with hand sanitizer versus handwashing: what are the planetary health consequences? |
title_full | Hand hygiene with hand sanitizer versus handwashing: what are the planetary health consequences? |
title_fullStr | Hand hygiene with hand sanitizer versus handwashing: what are the planetary health consequences? |
title_full_unstemmed | Hand hygiene with hand sanitizer versus handwashing: what are the planetary health consequences? |
title_short | Hand hygiene with hand sanitizer versus handwashing: what are the planetary health consequences? |
title_sort | hand hygiene with hand sanitizer versus handwashing: what are the planetary health consequences? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35199264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18918-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duanebrett handhygienewithhandsanitizerversushandwashingwhataretheplanetaryhealthconsequences AT pillingjessica handhygienewithhandsanitizerversushandwashingwhataretheplanetaryhealthconsequences AT sagetsophie handhygienewithhandsanitizerversushandwashingwhataretheplanetaryhealthconsequences AT ashleypaul handhygienewithhandsanitizerversushandwashingwhataretheplanetaryhealthconsequences AT pinhasallanr handhygienewithhandsanitizerversushandwashingwhataretheplanetaryhealthconsequences AT lynealexandra handhygienewithhandsanitizerversushandwashingwhataretheplanetaryhealthconsequences |