Cargando…

Sagittal Cephalometric Evaluation Without Point Nasion: Sagittal G-Triangle Analysis

This study aims to introduce a new sagittal cephalometric measurement, the sagittal G-triangle analysis, to accurately and reproducibly assess the sagittal jaw relationship. Sagittal G-triangle analysis, which consists of angles AXK and BXK, is based on an equilateral triangle (Bo–X–K) constructed u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Boxiu, Zhang, Zhuomin, Lin, Xinping, Dong, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34669681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008290
_version_ 1784655603970342912
author Li, Boxiu
Zhang, Zhuomin
Lin, Xinping
Dong, Yan
author_facet Li, Boxiu
Zhang, Zhuomin
Lin, Xinping
Dong, Yan
author_sort Li, Boxiu
collection PubMed
description This study aims to introduce a new sagittal cephalometric measurement, the sagittal G-triangle analysis, to accurately and reproducibly assess the sagittal jaw relationship. Sagittal G-triangle analysis, which consists of angles AXK and BXK, is based on an equilateral triangle (Bo–X–K) constructed using 5 cephalometric landmarks (Ba, Bo, Po, Or, and G). To test the diagnostic efficiency of this analysis, pretreatment cephalometric radiographs of 120 female and 120 male Chinese patients were randomly selected. For each enlisted subject, angles SNA and SNB as well as angles AXK and BXK were measured and recorded. On the basis of the SNA and SNB results, subjects were categorized into 6 groups: maxillary retrognathism, normal maxilla, maxillary prognathism, mandibular retrognathism, normal mandible, and mandibular prognathism. The diagnostic efficiency of angles AXK and BXK were evaluated using various statistical tests. A high correlation was detected between angles SNA and AXK as well as between angles SNB and BXK. Female patients with angle AXK between −2.255° and 2.860° and male patients with angle AXK between −2.615° and 2.120° were considered to have a normal maxilla position. Female patients with angle BXK between −2.61° and 2.93° and male patients with angle BXK between −2.275° and 0.610° were considered to have a normal mandible position. In conclusion, sagittal G-triangle analysis could be used as an alternative method for the evaluation of the sagittal position of the maxilla and mandible in cephalometric analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8865203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88652032022-02-24 Sagittal Cephalometric Evaluation Without Point Nasion: Sagittal G-Triangle Analysis Li, Boxiu Zhang, Zhuomin Lin, Xinping Dong, Yan J Craniofac Surg Original Articles This study aims to introduce a new sagittal cephalometric measurement, the sagittal G-triangle analysis, to accurately and reproducibly assess the sagittal jaw relationship. Sagittal G-triangle analysis, which consists of angles AXK and BXK, is based on an equilateral triangle (Bo–X–K) constructed using 5 cephalometric landmarks (Ba, Bo, Po, Or, and G). To test the diagnostic efficiency of this analysis, pretreatment cephalometric radiographs of 120 female and 120 male Chinese patients were randomly selected. For each enlisted subject, angles SNA and SNB as well as angles AXK and BXK were measured and recorded. On the basis of the SNA and SNB results, subjects were categorized into 6 groups: maxillary retrognathism, normal maxilla, maxillary prognathism, mandibular retrognathism, normal mandible, and mandibular prognathism. The diagnostic efficiency of angles AXK and BXK were evaluated using various statistical tests. A high correlation was detected between angles SNA and AXK as well as between angles SNB and BXK. Female patients with angle AXK between −2.255° and 2.860° and male patients with angle AXK between −2.615° and 2.120° were considered to have a normal maxilla position. Female patients with angle BXK between −2.61° and 2.93° and male patients with angle BXK between −2.275° and 0.610° were considered to have a normal mandible position. In conclusion, sagittal G-triangle analysis could be used as an alternative method for the evaluation of the sagittal position of the maxilla and mandible in cephalometric analysis. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022 2022-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8865203/ /pubmed/34669681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008290 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Mutaz B. Habal, MD. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Articles
Li, Boxiu
Zhang, Zhuomin
Lin, Xinping
Dong, Yan
Sagittal Cephalometric Evaluation Without Point Nasion: Sagittal G-Triangle Analysis
title Sagittal Cephalometric Evaluation Without Point Nasion: Sagittal G-Triangle Analysis
title_full Sagittal Cephalometric Evaluation Without Point Nasion: Sagittal G-Triangle Analysis
title_fullStr Sagittal Cephalometric Evaluation Without Point Nasion: Sagittal G-Triangle Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Sagittal Cephalometric Evaluation Without Point Nasion: Sagittal G-Triangle Analysis
title_short Sagittal Cephalometric Evaluation Without Point Nasion: Sagittal G-Triangle Analysis
title_sort sagittal cephalometric evaluation without point nasion: sagittal g-triangle analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34669681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008290
work_keys_str_mv AT liboxiu sagittalcephalometricevaluationwithoutpointnasionsagittalgtriangleanalysis
AT zhangzhuomin sagittalcephalometricevaluationwithoutpointnasionsagittalgtriangleanalysis
AT linxinping sagittalcephalometricevaluationwithoutpointnasionsagittalgtriangleanalysis
AT dongyan sagittalcephalometricevaluationwithoutpointnasionsagittalgtriangleanalysis