Cargando…
Sagittal Cephalometric Evaluation Without Point Nasion: Sagittal G-Triangle Analysis
This study aims to introduce a new sagittal cephalometric measurement, the sagittal G-triangle analysis, to accurately and reproducibly assess the sagittal jaw relationship. Sagittal G-triangle analysis, which consists of angles AXK and BXK, is based on an equilateral triangle (Bo–X–K) constructed u...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34669681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008290 |
_version_ | 1784655603970342912 |
---|---|
author | Li, Boxiu Zhang, Zhuomin Lin, Xinping Dong, Yan |
author_facet | Li, Boxiu Zhang, Zhuomin Lin, Xinping Dong, Yan |
author_sort | Li, Boxiu |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aims to introduce a new sagittal cephalometric measurement, the sagittal G-triangle analysis, to accurately and reproducibly assess the sagittal jaw relationship. Sagittal G-triangle analysis, which consists of angles AXK and BXK, is based on an equilateral triangle (Bo–X–K) constructed using 5 cephalometric landmarks (Ba, Bo, Po, Or, and G). To test the diagnostic efficiency of this analysis, pretreatment cephalometric radiographs of 120 female and 120 male Chinese patients were randomly selected. For each enlisted subject, angles SNA and SNB as well as angles AXK and BXK were measured and recorded. On the basis of the SNA and SNB results, subjects were categorized into 6 groups: maxillary retrognathism, normal maxilla, maxillary prognathism, mandibular retrognathism, normal mandible, and mandibular prognathism. The diagnostic efficiency of angles AXK and BXK were evaluated using various statistical tests. A high correlation was detected between angles SNA and AXK as well as between angles SNB and BXK. Female patients with angle AXK between −2.255° and 2.860° and male patients with angle AXK between −2.615° and 2.120° were considered to have a normal maxilla position. Female patients with angle BXK between −2.61° and 2.93° and male patients with angle BXK between −2.275° and 0.610° were considered to have a normal mandible position. In conclusion, sagittal G-triangle analysis could be used as an alternative method for the evaluation of the sagittal position of the maxilla and mandible in cephalometric analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8865203 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88652032022-02-24 Sagittal Cephalometric Evaluation Without Point Nasion: Sagittal G-Triangle Analysis Li, Boxiu Zhang, Zhuomin Lin, Xinping Dong, Yan J Craniofac Surg Original Articles This study aims to introduce a new sagittal cephalometric measurement, the sagittal G-triangle analysis, to accurately and reproducibly assess the sagittal jaw relationship. Sagittal G-triangle analysis, which consists of angles AXK and BXK, is based on an equilateral triangle (Bo–X–K) constructed using 5 cephalometric landmarks (Ba, Bo, Po, Or, and G). To test the diagnostic efficiency of this analysis, pretreatment cephalometric radiographs of 120 female and 120 male Chinese patients were randomly selected. For each enlisted subject, angles SNA and SNB as well as angles AXK and BXK were measured and recorded. On the basis of the SNA and SNB results, subjects were categorized into 6 groups: maxillary retrognathism, normal maxilla, maxillary prognathism, mandibular retrognathism, normal mandible, and mandibular prognathism. The diagnostic efficiency of angles AXK and BXK were evaluated using various statistical tests. A high correlation was detected between angles SNA and AXK as well as between angles SNB and BXK. Female patients with angle AXK between −2.255° and 2.860° and male patients with angle AXK between −2.615° and 2.120° were considered to have a normal maxilla position. Female patients with angle BXK between −2.61° and 2.93° and male patients with angle BXK between −2.275° and 0.610° were considered to have a normal mandible position. In conclusion, sagittal G-triangle analysis could be used as an alternative method for the evaluation of the sagittal position of the maxilla and mandible in cephalometric analysis. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022 2022-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8865203/ /pubmed/34669681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008290 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Mutaz B. Habal, MD. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Li, Boxiu Zhang, Zhuomin Lin, Xinping Dong, Yan Sagittal Cephalometric Evaluation Without Point Nasion: Sagittal G-Triangle Analysis |
title | Sagittal Cephalometric Evaluation Without Point Nasion: Sagittal G-Triangle Analysis |
title_full | Sagittal Cephalometric Evaluation Without Point Nasion: Sagittal G-Triangle Analysis |
title_fullStr | Sagittal Cephalometric Evaluation Without Point Nasion: Sagittal G-Triangle Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Sagittal Cephalometric Evaluation Without Point Nasion: Sagittal G-Triangle Analysis |
title_short | Sagittal Cephalometric Evaluation Without Point Nasion: Sagittal G-Triangle Analysis |
title_sort | sagittal cephalometric evaluation without point nasion: sagittal g-triangle analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34669681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008290 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liboxiu sagittalcephalometricevaluationwithoutpointnasionsagittalgtriangleanalysis AT zhangzhuomin sagittalcephalometricevaluationwithoutpointnasionsagittalgtriangleanalysis AT linxinping sagittalcephalometricevaluationwithoutpointnasionsagittalgtriangleanalysis AT dongyan sagittalcephalometricevaluationwithoutpointnasionsagittalgtriangleanalysis |