Cargando…

Timely Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Veterans Health Administration: A Qualitative Assessment of Current Practice and Perceived Barriers

INTRODUCTION: The Veterans Health Administration introduced a clinical reminder system in 2018 to help address process gaps in colorectal cancer screening, including the diagnostic evaluation of positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results. We conducted a qualitative study to explore the differe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mog, Ashley C., Liang, Peter S., Donovan, Lucas M., Sayre, George G., Shaukat, Aasma, May, Folasade P., Glorioso, Thomas J., Jorgenson, Michelle A., Wood, Gordon Blake, Mueller, Candice, Dominitz, Jason A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35060937
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000438
_version_ 1784655649370537984
author Mog, Ashley C.
Liang, Peter S.
Donovan, Lucas M.
Sayre, George G.
Shaukat, Aasma
May, Folasade P.
Glorioso, Thomas J.
Jorgenson, Michelle A.
Wood, Gordon Blake
Mueller, Candice
Dominitz, Jason A.
author_facet Mog, Ashley C.
Liang, Peter S.
Donovan, Lucas M.
Sayre, George G.
Shaukat, Aasma
May, Folasade P.
Glorioso, Thomas J.
Jorgenson, Michelle A.
Wood, Gordon Blake
Mueller, Candice
Dominitz, Jason A.
author_sort Mog, Ashley C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Veterans Health Administration introduced a clinical reminder system in 2018 to help address process gaps in colorectal cancer screening, including the diagnostic evaluation of positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results. We conducted a qualitative study to explore the differences between facilities who performed in the top vs bottom decile for follow-up colonoscopy. METHODS: Seventeen semistructured interviews with gastroenterology (GI) providers and staff were conducted at 9 high-performing and 8 low-performing sites. RESULTS: We identified 2 domains, current practices and perceived barriers, and most findings were described by both high- and low-performing sites. Findings exclusive to 1 group mainly pertained to current practices, especially arranging colonoscopy for FIT-positive patients. We observed only 1 difference in the perceived barriers domain, which pertained to primary care providers. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that what primarily distinguishes high- and low-performing sites is not a difference in barriers but rather in the GI clinical care process. Developing and disseminating patient education materials about the importance of diagnostic colonoscopy, eliminating in-person precolonoscopy visits when clinically appropriate, and involving GI in missed colonoscopy appointments and outside referrals should all be considered to increase follow-up colonoscopy rates. Our study illustrates the challenges of performing a timely colonoscopy after a positive FIT result and provides insights on improving the clinical care process for patients who are at substantially increased risk for colorectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8865517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88655172022-02-24 Timely Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Veterans Health Administration: A Qualitative Assessment of Current Practice and Perceived Barriers Mog, Ashley C. Liang, Peter S. Donovan, Lucas M. Sayre, George G. Shaukat, Aasma May, Folasade P. Glorioso, Thomas J. Jorgenson, Michelle A. Wood, Gordon Blake Mueller, Candice Dominitz, Jason A. Clin Transl Gastroenterol Article INTRODUCTION: The Veterans Health Administration introduced a clinical reminder system in 2018 to help address process gaps in colorectal cancer screening, including the diagnostic evaluation of positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results. We conducted a qualitative study to explore the differences between facilities who performed in the top vs bottom decile for follow-up colonoscopy. METHODS: Seventeen semistructured interviews with gastroenterology (GI) providers and staff were conducted at 9 high-performing and 8 low-performing sites. RESULTS: We identified 2 domains, current practices and perceived barriers, and most findings were described by both high- and low-performing sites. Findings exclusive to 1 group mainly pertained to current practices, especially arranging colonoscopy for FIT-positive patients. We observed only 1 difference in the perceived barriers domain, which pertained to primary care providers. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that what primarily distinguishes high- and low-performing sites is not a difference in barriers but rather in the GI clinical care process. Developing and disseminating patient education materials about the importance of diagnostic colonoscopy, eliminating in-person precolonoscopy visits when clinically appropriate, and involving GI in missed colonoscopy appointments and outside referrals should all be considered to increase follow-up colonoscopy rates. Our study illustrates the challenges of performing a timely colonoscopy after a positive FIT result and provides insights on improving the clinical care process for patients who are at substantially increased risk for colorectal cancer. Wolters Kluwer 2022-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8865517/ /pubmed/35060937 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000438 Text en Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a “work of the United States Government” for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Mog, Ashley C.
Liang, Peter S.
Donovan, Lucas M.
Sayre, George G.
Shaukat, Aasma
May, Folasade P.
Glorioso, Thomas J.
Jorgenson, Michelle A.
Wood, Gordon Blake
Mueller, Candice
Dominitz, Jason A.
Timely Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Veterans Health Administration: A Qualitative Assessment of Current Practice and Perceived Barriers
title Timely Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Veterans Health Administration: A Qualitative Assessment of Current Practice and Perceived Barriers
title_full Timely Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Veterans Health Administration: A Qualitative Assessment of Current Practice and Perceived Barriers
title_fullStr Timely Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Veterans Health Administration: A Qualitative Assessment of Current Practice and Perceived Barriers
title_full_unstemmed Timely Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Veterans Health Administration: A Qualitative Assessment of Current Practice and Perceived Barriers
title_short Timely Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Veterans Health Administration: A Qualitative Assessment of Current Practice and Perceived Barriers
title_sort timely colonoscopy after positive fecal immunochemical tests in the veterans health administration: a qualitative assessment of current practice and perceived barriers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35060937
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000438
work_keys_str_mv AT mogashleyc timelycolonoscopyafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsintheveteranshealthadministrationaqualitativeassessmentofcurrentpracticeandperceivedbarriers
AT liangpeters timelycolonoscopyafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsintheveteranshealthadministrationaqualitativeassessmentofcurrentpracticeandperceivedbarriers
AT donovanlucasm timelycolonoscopyafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsintheveteranshealthadministrationaqualitativeassessmentofcurrentpracticeandperceivedbarriers
AT sayregeorgeg timelycolonoscopyafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsintheveteranshealthadministrationaqualitativeassessmentofcurrentpracticeandperceivedbarriers
AT shaukataasma timelycolonoscopyafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsintheveteranshealthadministrationaqualitativeassessmentofcurrentpracticeandperceivedbarriers
AT mayfolasadep timelycolonoscopyafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsintheveteranshealthadministrationaqualitativeassessmentofcurrentpracticeandperceivedbarriers
AT gloriosothomasj timelycolonoscopyafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsintheveteranshealthadministrationaqualitativeassessmentofcurrentpracticeandperceivedbarriers
AT jorgensonmichellea timelycolonoscopyafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsintheveteranshealthadministrationaqualitativeassessmentofcurrentpracticeandperceivedbarriers
AT woodgordonblake timelycolonoscopyafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsintheveteranshealthadministrationaqualitativeassessmentofcurrentpracticeandperceivedbarriers
AT muellercandice timelycolonoscopyafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsintheveteranshealthadministrationaqualitativeassessmentofcurrentpracticeandperceivedbarriers
AT dominitzjasona timelycolonoscopyafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsintheveteranshealthadministrationaqualitativeassessmentofcurrentpracticeandperceivedbarriers