Cargando…

Estimating SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Canadian Blood Donors, April 2020 to March 2021: Improving Accuracy with Multiple Assays

We have previously used composite reference standards and latent class analysis (LCA) to evaluate the performance of laboratory assays in the presence of tarnished gold standards. Here, we apply these techniques to repeated, cross-sectional study of Canadian blood donors, whose sera underwent parall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tuite, Ashleigh R., Fisman, David, Abe, Kento T., Rathod, Bhavisha, Pasculescu, Adrian, Colwill, Karen, Gingras, Anne-Claude, Yi, Qi-Long, O’Brien, Sheila F., Drews, Steven J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35196819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02563-21
_version_ 1784655656641363968
author Tuite, Ashleigh R.
Fisman, David
Abe, Kento T.
Rathod, Bhavisha
Pasculescu, Adrian
Colwill, Karen
Gingras, Anne-Claude
Yi, Qi-Long
O’Brien, Sheila F.
Drews, Steven J.
author_facet Tuite, Ashleigh R.
Fisman, David
Abe, Kento T.
Rathod, Bhavisha
Pasculescu, Adrian
Colwill, Karen
Gingras, Anne-Claude
Yi, Qi-Long
O’Brien, Sheila F.
Drews, Steven J.
author_sort Tuite, Ashleigh R.
collection PubMed
description We have previously used composite reference standards and latent class analysis (LCA) to evaluate the performance of laboratory assays in the presence of tarnished gold standards. Here, we apply these techniques to repeated, cross-sectional study of Canadian blood donors, whose sera underwent parallel testing with four separate SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays. We designed a repeated cross-sectional design with random cross-sectional sampling of all available retention samples (n = 1500/month) for a 12 -month period from April 2020 until March 2021. Each sample was evaluated for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies using four assays an Abbott Architect assay targeting the nucleocapsid antigen (Abbott-NP, Abbott, Chicago IL) and three in-house IgG ELISAs recognizing distinct recombinant viral antigens: full-length spike glycoprotein (Spike), spike glycoprotein receptor binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid (NP). We used two analytic approaches to estimate SAR-CoV-2 seroprevalence: a composite reference standard and LCA. Using LCA to estimate true seropositivity status based on the results of the four antibody tests, we estimated that seroprevalence increased from 0.8% (95% CI: 0.5–1.4%) in April 2020 to 6.3% (95% CI: 5.1–7.6%) in March 2021. Our study provides further support for the use of LCA in upcoming public health crises, epidemics, and pandemics when a gold standard assay may not be available or identifiable. IMPORTANCE Here, we describe an approach to estimating seroprevalence in a low prevalence setting when multiple assays are available and yet no known gold standard exists. Because serological studies identify cases through both diagnostic testing and surveillance, and otherwise silent, unrecognized infections, serological data can be used to estimate the true infection fatality ratio of a disease. However, seroprevalence studies rely on assays with imperfect sensitivity and specificity. Seroreversion (loss of antibody response) also occurs over time, and with the advent of vaccination, distinction of antibody response resulting from vaccination as opposed to antibody response due to infection has posed an additional challenge. Our approach indicates that seroprevalence on Canadian blood donors by the end of March 2021was less than 10%. Our study supports the use of latent class analysis in upcoming public health crises, epidemics, and pandemics when a gold standard assay may not be available or identifiable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8865569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88655692022-03-03 Estimating SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Canadian Blood Donors, April 2020 to March 2021: Improving Accuracy with Multiple Assays Tuite, Ashleigh R. Fisman, David Abe, Kento T. Rathod, Bhavisha Pasculescu, Adrian Colwill, Karen Gingras, Anne-Claude Yi, Qi-Long O’Brien, Sheila F. Drews, Steven J. Microbiol Spectr Research Article We have previously used composite reference standards and latent class analysis (LCA) to evaluate the performance of laboratory assays in the presence of tarnished gold standards. Here, we apply these techniques to repeated, cross-sectional study of Canadian blood donors, whose sera underwent parallel testing with four separate SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays. We designed a repeated cross-sectional design with random cross-sectional sampling of all available retention samples (n = 1500/month) for a 12 -month period from April 2020 until March 2021. Each sample was evaluated for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies using four assays an Abbott Architect assay targeting the nucleocapsid antigen (Abbott-NP, Abbott, Chicago IL) and three in-house IgG ELISAs recognizing distinct recombinant viral antigens: full-length spike glycoprotein (Spike), spike glycoprotein receptor binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid (NP). We used two analytic approaches to estimate SAR-CoV-2 seroprevalence: a composite reference standard and LCA. Using LCA to estimate true seropositivity status based on the results of the four antibody tests, we estimated that seroprevalence increased from 0.8% (95% CI: 0.5–1.4%) in April 2020 to 6.3% (95% CI: 5.1–7.6%) in March 2021. Our study provides further support for the use of LCA in upcoming public health crises, epidemics, and pandemics when a gold standard assay may not be available or identifiable. IMPORTANCE Here, we describe an approach to estimating seroprevalence in a low prevalence setting when multiple assays are available and yet no known gold standard exists. Because serological studies identify cases through both diagnostic testing and surveillance, and otherwise silent, unrecognized infections, serological data can be used to estimate the true infection fatality ratio of a disease. However, seroprevalence studies rely on assays with imperfect sensitivity and specificity. Seroreversion (loss of antibody response) also occurs over time, and with the advent of vaccination, distinction of antibody response resulting from vaccination as opposed to antibody response due to infection has posed an additional challenge. Our approach indicates that seroprevalence on Canadian blood donors by the end of March 2021was less than 10%. Our study supports the use of latent class analysis in upcoming public health crises, epidemics, and pandemics when a gold standard assay may not be available or identifiable. American Society for Microbiology 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8865569/ /pubmed/35196819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02563-21 Text en Copyright © 2022 Tuite et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Tuite, Ashleigh R.
Fisman, David
Abe, Kento T.
Rathod, Bhavisha
Pasculescu, Adrian
Colwill, Karen
Gingras, Anne-Claude
Yi, Qi-Long
O’Brien, Sheila F.
Drews, Steven J.
Estimating SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Canadian Blood Donors, April 2020 to March 2021: Improving Accuracy with Multiple Assays
title Estimating SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Canadian Blood Donors, April 2020 to March 2021: Improving Accuracy with Multiple Assays
title_full Estimating SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Canadian Blood Donors, April 2020 to March 2021: Improving Accuracy with Multiple Assays
title_fullStr Estimating SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Canadian Blood Donors, April 2020 to March 2021: Improving Accuracy with Multiple Assays
title_full_unstemmed Estimating SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Canadian Blood Donors, April 2020 to March 2021: Improving Accuracy with Multiple Assays
title_short Estimating SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Canadian Blood Donors, April 2020 to March 2021: Improving Accuracy with Multiple Assays
title_sort estimating sars-cov-2 seroprevalence in canadian blood donors, april 2020 to march 2021: improving accuracy with multiple assays
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35196819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02563-21
work_keys_str_mv AT tuiteashleighr estimatingsarscov2seroprevalenceincanadianblooddonorsapril2020tomarch2021improvingaccuracywithmultipleassays
AT fismandavid estimatingsarscov2seroprevalenceincanadianblooddonorsapril2020tomarch2021improvingaccuracywithmultipleassays
AT abekentot estimatingsarscov2seroprevalenceincanadianblooddonorsapril2020tomarch2021improvingaccuracywithmultipleassays
AT rathodbhavisha estimatingsarscov2seroprevalenceincanadianblooddonorsapril2020tomarch2021improvingaccuracywithmultipleassays
AT pasculescuadrian estimatingsarscov2seroprevalenceincanadianblooddonorsapril2020tomarch2021improvingaccuracywithmultipleassays
AT colwillkaren estimatingsarscov2seroprevalenceincanadianblooddonorsapril2020tomarch2021improvingaccuracywithmultipleassays
AT gingrasanneclaude estimatingsarscov2seroprevalenceincanadianblooddonorsapril2020tomarch2021improvingaccuracywithmultipleassays
AT yiqilong estimatingsarscov2seroprevalenceincanadianblooddonorsapril2020tomarch2021improvingaccuracywithmultipleassays
AT obriensheilaf estimatingsarscov2seroprevalenceincanadianblooddonorsapril2020tomarch2021improvingaccuracywithmultipleassays
AT drewsstevenj estimatingsarscov2seroprevalenceincanadianblooddonorsapril2020tomarch2021improvingaccuracywithmultipleassays