Cargando…

The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the UK: The Case for Reform

Early medical abortion (EMA) involves the administration of two medications—mifepristone and misoprostol—24–48 hours apart. These routinely used medications are recognised as safe and effective by the World Health Organization which recommends this combination of medications as a safe form of aborti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe, Mullock, Alexandra, Parsons, Jordan A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34907444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwab042
_version_ 1784655695176531968
author Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe
Mullock, Alexandra
Parsons, Jordan A
author_facet Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe
Mullock, Alexandra
Parsons, Jordan A
author_sort Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe
collection PubMed
description Early medical abortion (EMA) involves the administration of two medications—mifepristone and misoprostol—24–48 hours apart. These routinely used medications are recognised as safe and effective by the World Health Organization which recommends this combination of medications as a safe form of abortion until nine weeks’ gestation. Despite the safety and effectiveness of this drug regimen, there exists excessive regulation around EMA. This is despite new regulations introduced in Northern Ireland in 2020 and (temporary) changes made in 2020 to allow at-home administration of mifepristone in Great Britain (following earlier changes to permit home use of misoprostol). We argue that the excessive regulation of EMA is inappropriate because it fails to recognise that abortion is essential healthcare. Further, the regulation constitutes disproportionate interference with clinical discretion and service organisation because it is medically unnecessary and prevents abortion providers in the UK from adapting their service provision in line with emerging evidence of best practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8865750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88657502022-02-24 The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the UK: The Case for Reform Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe Mullock, Alexandra Parsons, Jordan A Med Law Rev Original Articles Early medical abortion (EMA) involves the administration of two medications—mifepristone and misoprostol—24–48 hours apart. These routinely used medications are recognised as safe and effective by the World Health Organization which recommends this combination of medications as a safe form of abortion until nine weeks’ gestation. Despite the safety and effectiveness of this drug regimen, there exists excessive regulation around EMA. This is despite new regulations introduced in Northern Ireland in 2020 and (temporary) changes made in 2020 to allow at-home administration of mifepristone in Great Britain (following earlier changes to permit home use of misoprostol). We argue that the excessive regulation of EMA is inappropriate because it fails to recognise that abortion is essential healthcare. Further, the regulation constitutes disproportionate interference with clinical discretion and service organisation because it is medically unnecessary and prevents abortion providers in the UK from adapting their service provision in line with emerging evidence of best practice. Oxford University Press 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8865750/ /pubmed/34907444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwab042 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe
Mullock, Alexandra
Parsons, Jordan A
The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the UK: The Case for Reform
title The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the UK: The Case for Reform
title_full The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the UK: The Case for Reform
title_fullStr The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the UK: The Case for Reform
title_full_unstemmed The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the UK: The Case for Reform
title_short The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the UK: The Case for Reform
title_sort excessive regulation of early abortion medication in the uk: the case for reform
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34907444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwab042
work_keys_str_mv AT romaniselizabethchloe theexcessiveregulationofearlyabortionmedicationintheukthecaseforreform
AT mullockalexandra theexcessiveregulationofearlyabortionmedicationintheukthecaseforreform
AT parsonsjordana theexcessiveregulationofearlyabortionmedicationintheukthecaseforreform
AT romaniselizabethchloe excessiveregulationofearlyabortionmedicationintheukthecaseforreform
AT mullockalexandra excessiveregulationofearlyabortionmedicationintheukthecaseforreform
AT parsonsjordana excessiveregulationofearlyabortionmedicationintheukthecaseforreform