Cargando…
The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the UK: The Case for Reform
Early medical abortion (EMA) involves the administration of two medications—mifepristone and misoprostol—24–48 hours apart. These routinely used medications are recognised as safe and effective by the World Health Organization which recommends this combination of medications as a safe form of aborti...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34907444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwab042 |
_version_ | 1784655695176531968 |
---|---|
author | Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe Mullock, Alexandra Parsons, Jordan A |
author_facet | Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe Mullock, Alexandra Parsons, Jordan A |
author_sort | Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Early medical abortion (EMA) involves the administration of two medications—mifepristone and misoprostol—24–48 hours apart. These routinely used medications are recognised as safe and effective by the World Health Organization which recommends this combination of medications as a safe form of abortion until nine weeks’ gestation. Despite the safety and effectiveness of this drug regimen, there exists excessive regulation around EMA. This is despite new regulations introduced in Northern Ireland in 2020 and (temporary) changes made in 2020 to allow at-home administration of mifepristone in Great Britain (following earlier changes to permit home use of misoprostol). We argue that the excessive regulation of EMA is inappropriate because it fails to recognise that abortion is essential healthcare. Further, the regulation constitutes disproportionate interference with clinical discretion and service organisation because it is medically unnecessary and prevents abortion providers in the UK from adapting their service provision in line with emerging evidence of best practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8865750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88657502022-02-24 The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the UK: The Case for Reform Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe Mullock, Alexandra Parsons, Jordan A Med Law Rev Original Articles Early medical abortion (EMA) involves the administration of two medications—mifepristone and misoprostol—24–48 hours apart. These routinely used medications are recognised as safe and effective by the World Health Organization which recommends this combination of medications as a safe form of abortion until nine weeks’ gestation. Despite the safety and effectiveness of this drug regimen, there exists excessive regulation around EMA. This is despite new regulations introduced in Northern Ireland in 2020 and (temporary) changes made in 2020 to allow at-home administration of mifepristone in Great Britain (following earlier changes to permit home use of misoprostol). We argue that the excessive regulation of EMA is inappropriate because it fails to recognise that abortion is essential healthcare. Further, the regulation constitutes disproportionate interference with clinical discretion and service organisation because it is medically unnecessary and prevents abortion providers in the UK from adapting their service provision in line with emerging evidence of best practice. Oxford University Press 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8865750/ /pubmed/34907444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwab042 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe Mullock, Alexandra Parsons, Jordan A The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the UK: The Case for Reform |
title | The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the UK: The Case for Reform |
title_full | The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the UK: The Case for Reform |
title_fullStr | The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the UK: The Case for Reform |
title_full_unstemmed | The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the UK: The Case for Reform |
title_short | The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the UK: The Case for Reform |
title_sort | excessive regulation of early abortion medication in the uk: the case for reform |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34907444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwab042 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT romaniselizabethchloe theexcessiveregulationofearlyabortionmedicationintheukthecaseforreform AT mullockalexandra theexcessiveregulationofearlyabortionmedicationintheukthecaseforreform AT parsonsjordana theexcessiveregulationofearlyabortionmedicationintheukthecaseforreform AT romaniselizabethchloe excessiveregulationofearlyabortionmedicationintheukthecaseforreform AT mullockalexandra excessiveregulationofearlyabortionmedicationintheukthecaseforreform AT parsonsjordana excessiveregulationofearlyabortionmedicationintheukthecaseforreform |