Cargando…

Determining prognostic variables of treatment outcome in obsessive–compulsive disorder: effectiveness and its predictors in routine clinical care

The objectives of this study were to investigate the naturalistic effectiveness of routine inpatient treatment for patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) and to identify predictors of treatment outcome. A routinely collected data set of 1,596 OCD inpatients (M = 33.9 years, SD = 11.7; 60....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herzog, Philipp, Osen, Bernhard, Stierle, Christian, Middendorf, Thomas, Voderholzer, Ulrich, Koch, Stefan, Feldmann, Matthias, Rief, Winfried, Brakemeier, Eva-Lotta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8866294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34218306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00406-021-01284-6
_version_ 1784655802573783040
author Herzog, Philipp
Osen, Bernhard
Stierle, Christian
Middendorf, Thomas
Voderholzer, Ulrich
Koch, Stefan
Feldmann, Matthias
Rief, Winfried
Brakemeier, Eva-Lotta
author_facet Herzog, Philipp
Osen, Bernhard
Stierle, Christian
Middendorf, Thomas
Voderholzer, Ulrich
Koch, Stefan
Feldmann, Matthias
Rief, Winfried
Brakemeier, Eva-Lotta
author_sort Herzog, Philipp
collection PubMed
description The objectives of this study were to investigate the naturalistic effectiveness of routine inpatient treatment for patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) and to identify predictors of treatment outcome. A routinely collected data set of 1,596 OCD inpatients (M = 33.9 years, SD = 11.7; 60.4% female) having received evidence-based psychotherapy based on the cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) in five German psychotherapeutic clinics was analyzed. Effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculated for several outcome variables to determine effectiveness. Predictor analyses were performed on a subsample (N = 514; M = 34.3 years, SD = 12.2; 60.3% female). For this purpose, the number of potential predictors was reduced using factor analysis, followed by multiple regression analysis to identify robust predictors. Effect sizes of various outcome variables could be classified as large (g = 1.34 of OCD–symptom change). Predictors of changes in OCD and depressive symptoms were symptom severity at admission and general psychopathological distress. In addition, patients with higher social support and more washing compulsions benefited more from treatment. Subgroup analyses showed a distinct predictor profile of changes in compulsions and obsessions. The results indicate that an evidence-based psychotherapy program for OCD can be effectively implemented in routine inpatient care. In addition to well-established predictors, social support, and washing compulsions in particular were identified as important positive predictors. Specific predictor profiles for changes in obsessions and compulsions are discussed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00406-021-01284-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8866294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88662942022-03-02 Determining prognostic variables of treatment outcome in obsessive–compulsive disorder: effectiveness and its predictors in routine clinical care Herzog, Philipp Osen, Bernhard Stierle, Christian Middendorf, Thomas Voderholzer, Ulrich Koch, Stefan Feldmann, Matthias Rief, Winfried Brakemeier, Eva-Lotta Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Original Paper The objectives of this study were to investigate the naturalistic effectiveness of routine inpatient treatment for patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) and to identify predictors of treatment outcome. A routinely collected data set of 1,596 OCD inpatients (M = 33.9 years, SD = 11.7; 60.4% female) having received evidence-based psychotherapy based on the cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) in five German psychotherapeutic clinics was analyzed. Effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculated for several outcome variables to determine effectiveness. Predictor analyses were performed on a subsample (N = 514; M = 34.3 years, SD = 12.2; 60.3% female). For this purpose, the number of potential predictors was reduced using factor analysis, followed by multiple regression analysis to identify robust predictors. Effect sizes of various outcome variables could be classified as large (g = 1.34 of OCD–symptom change). Predictors of changes in OCD and depressive symptoms were symptom severity at admission and general psychopathological distress. In addition, patients with higher social support and more washing compulsions benefited more from treatment. Subgroup analyses showed a distinct predictor profile of changes in compulsions and obsessions. The results indicate that an evidence-based psychotherapy program for OCD can be effectively implemented in routine inpatient care. In addition to well-established predictors, social support, and washing compulsions in particular were identified as important positive predictors. Specific predictor profiles for changes in obsessions and compulsions are discussed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00406-021-01284-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-07-03 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8866294/ /pubmed/34218306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00406-021-01284-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Herzog, Philipp
Osen, Bernhard
Stierle, Christian
Middendorf, Thomas
Voderholzer, Ulrich
Koch, Stefan
Feldmann, Matthias
Rief, Winfried
Brakemeier, Eva-Lotta
Determining prognostic variables of treatment outcome in obsessive–compulsive disorder: effectiveness and its predictors in routine clinical care
title Determining prognostic variables of treatment outcome in obsessive–compulsive disorder: effectiveness and its predictors in routine clinical care
title_full Determining prognostic variables of treatment outcome in obsessive–compulsive disorder: effectiveness and its predictors in routine clinical care
title_fullStr Determining prognostic variables of treatment outcome in obsessive–compulsive disorder: effectiveness and its predictors in routine clinical care
title_full_unstemmed Determining prognostic variables of treatment outcome in obsessive–compulsive disorder: effectiveness and its predictors in routine clinical care
title_short Determining prognostic variables of treatment outcome in obsessive–compulsive disorder: effectiveness and its predictors in routine clinical care
title_sort determining prognostic variables of treatment outcome in obsessive–compulsive disorder: effectiveness and its predictors in routine clinical care
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8866294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34218306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00406-021-01284-6
work_keys_str_mv AT herzogphilipp determiningprognosticvariablesoftreatmentoutcomeinobsessivecompulsivedisordereffectivenessanditspredictorsinroutineclinicalcare
AT osenbernhard determiningprognosticvariablesoftreatmentoutcomeinobsessivecompulsivedisordereffectivenessanditspredictorsinroutineclinicalcare
AT stierlechristian determiningprognosticvariablesoftreatmentoutcomeinobsessivecompulsivedisordereffectivenessanditspredictorsinroutineclinicalcare
AT middendorfthomas determiningprognosticvariablesoftreatmentoutcomeinobsessivecompulsivedisordereffectivenessanditspredictorsinroutineclinicalcare
AT voderholzerulrich determiningprognosticvariablesoftreatmentoutcomeinobsessivecompulsivedisordereffectivenessanditspredictorsinroutineclinicalcare
AT kochstefan determiningprognosticvariablesoftreatmentoutcomeinobsessivecompulsivedisordereffectivenessanditspredictorsinroutineclinicalcare
AT feldmannmatthias determiningprognosticvariablesoftreatmentoutcomeinobsessivecompulsivedisordereffectivenessanditspredictorsinroutineclinicalcare
AT riefwinfried determiningprognosticvariablesoftreatmentoutcomeinobsessivecompulsivedisordereffectivenessanditspredictorsinroutineclinicalcare
AT brakemeierevalotta determiningprognosticvariablesoftreatmentoutcomeinobsessivecompulsivedisordereffectivenessanditspredictorsinroutineclinicalcare