Cargando…

Medial stabilised total knee arthroplasty achieves comparable clinical outcomes when compared to other TKA designs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare clinical and patient-reported outcome measures of medially stabilised (MS) TKA when compared to other TKA designs. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses algorit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nisar, Sohail, Ahmad, Kashif, Palan, Jeya, Pandit, Hemant, van Duren, Bernard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8866298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33247352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06358-x
_version_ 1784655803308834816
author Nisar, Sohail
Ahmad, Kashif
Palan, Jeya
Pandit, Hemant
van Duren, Bernard
author_facet Nisar, Sohail
Ahmad, Kashif
Palan, Jeya
Pandit, Hemant
van Duren, Bernard
author_sort Nisar, Sohail
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare clinical and patient-reported outcome measures of medially stabilised (MS) TKA when compared to other TKA designs. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses algorithm was used. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EMCARE databases were searched to June 2020. Studies with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up comparing an MS TKA design to any other TKA design were included. The statistical analysis was completed using Review Manager (RevMan), Version 5.3. RESULTS: The 22 studies meeting the inclusion criteria included 3011 patients and 4102 TKAs. Overall Oxford Knee Scores were significantly better (p = 0.0007) for MS TKA, but there was no difference in the Forgotten Joint Scores (FJS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Society Score (KSS)-Knee, KSS-Function, and range of motion between MS and non-MS TKA designs. Significant differences were noted for sub-group analyses; MS TKA showed significantly worse KSS-Knee (p = 0.02) and WOMAC (p = 0.03) scores when compared to Rotating Platform (RP) TKA while significantly better FJS (p = 0.002) and KSS-knee scores (p = 0.0001) when compared to cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA. CONCLUSION: This review and meta-analysis show that MS TKA designs result in both patient and clinical outcomes that are comparable to non-MS implants. These results suggest implant design alone may not provide further improvement in patient outcome following TKA, surgeons must consider other factors, such as alignment to achieve superior outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00167-020-06358-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8866298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88662982022-03-02 Medial stabilised total knee arthroplasty achieves comparable clinical outcomes when compared to other TKA designs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature Nisar, Sohail Ahmad, Kashif Palan, Jeya Pandit, Hemant van Duren, Bernard Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Knee PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare clinical and patient-reported outcome measures of medially stabilised (MS) TKA when compared to other TKA designs. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses algorithm was used. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EMCARE databases were searched to June 2020. Studies with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up comparing an MS TKA design to any other TKA design were included. The statistical analysis was completed using Review Manager (RevMan), Version 5.3. RESULTS: The 22 studies meeting the inclusion criteria included 3011 patients and 4102 TKAs. Overall Oxford Knee Scores were significantly better (p = 0.0007) for MS TKA, but there was no difference in the Forgotten Joint Scores (FJS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Society Score (KSS)-Knee, KSS-Function, and range of motion between MS and non-MS TKA designs. Significant differences were noted for sub-group analyses; MS TKA showed significantly worse KSS-Knee (p = 0.02) and WOMAC (p = 0.03) scores when compared to Rotating Platform (RP) TKA while significantly better FJS (p = 0.002) and KSS-knee scores (p = 0.0001) when compared to cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA. CONCLUSION: This review and meta-analysis show that MS TKA designs result in both patient and clinical outcomes that are comparable to non-MS implants. These results suggest implant design alone may not provide further improvement in patient outcome following TKA, surgeons must consider other factors, such as alignment to achieve superior outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00167-020-06358-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8866298/ /pubmed/33247352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06358-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Knee
Nisar, Sohail
Ahmad, Kashif
Palan, Jeya
Pandit, Hemant
van Duren, Bernard
Medial stabilised total knee arthroplasty achieves comparable clinical outcomes when compared to other TKA designs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature
title Medial stabilised total knee arthroplasty achieves comparable clinical outcomes when compared to other TKA designs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature
title_full Medial stabilised total knee arthroplasty achieves comparable clinical outcomes when compared to other TKA designs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature
title_fullStr Medial stabilised total knee arthroplasty achieves comparable clinical outcomes when compared to other TKA designs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature
title_full_unstemmed Medial stabilised total knee arthroplasty achieves comparable clinical outcomes when compared to other TKA designs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature
title_short Medial stabilised total knee arthroplasty achieves comparable clinical outcomes when compared to other TKA designs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature
title_sort medial stabilised total knee arthroplasty achieves comparable clinical outcomes when compared to other tka designs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature
topic Knee
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8866298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33247352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06358-x
work_keys_str_mv AT nisarsohail medialstabilisedtotalkneearthroplastyachievescomparableclinicaloutcomeswhencomparedtoothertkadesignsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthecurrentliterature
AT ahmadkashif medialstabilisedtotalkneearthroplastyachievescomparableclinicaloutcomeswhencomparedtoothertkadesignsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthecurrentliterature
AT palanjeya medialstabilisedtotalkneearthroplastyachievescomparableclinicaloutcomeswhencomparedtoothertkadesignsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthecurrentliterature
AT pandithemant medialstabilisedtotalkneearthroplastyachievescomparableclinicaloutcomeswhencomparedtoothertkadesignsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthecurrentliterature
AT vandurenbernard medialstabilisedtotalkneearthroplastyachievescomparableclinicaloutcomeswhencomparedtoothertkadesignsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthecurrentliterature