Cargando…

Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, which has been increasingly used as an investigational tool in neuroscience. In social and affective neuroscience research, the prefrontal cortex has been primarily targeted, since this brain region is crit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farhat, Luis C, Carvalho, Andre F, Solmi, Marco, Brunoni, Andre R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8866814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32577732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa084
_version_ 1784655913742761984
author Farhat, Luis C
Carvalho, Andre F
Solmi, Marco
Brunoni, Andre R
author_facet Farhat, Luis C
Carvalho, Andre F
Solmi, Marco
Brunoni, Andre R
author_sort Farhat, Luis C
collection PubMed
description Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, which has been increasingly used as an investigational tool in neuroscience. In social and affective neuroscience research, the prefrontal cortex has been primarily targeted, since this brain region is critically involved in complex psychobiological processes subserving both Șhotș and Școldș domains. Although several studies have suggested that prefrontal tDCS can enhance neuropsychological outcomes, meta-analyses have reported conflicting results. Therefore, we aimed to assess the available evidence by performing an umbrella review of meta-analyses. We evaluated the effects of prefrontal active vs sham tDCS on different domains of cognition among healthy and neuropsychiatric individuals. A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 was employed to evaluate the quality of meta-analyses, and the GRADE system was employed to grade the quality of evidence of every comparison from each meta-analysis. PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched, and 11 meta-analyses were included resulting in 55 comparisons. Only 16 comparisons reported significant effects favoring tDCS, but 13 of them had either very low or low quality of evidence. Of the remaining 39 comparisons which reported non-significant effects, 38 had either very low or low quality of evidence. Meta-analyses were rated as having critically low and low quality. Among several reasons to explain these findings, the lack of consensus and reproducibility in tDCS research is discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8866814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88668142022-02-24 Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS Farhat, Luis C Carvalho, Andre F Solmi, Marco Brunoni, Andre R Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Manuscript Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, which has been increasingly used as an investigational tool in neuroscience. In social and affective neuroscience research, the prefrontal cortex has been primarily targeted, since this brain region is critically involved in complex psychobiological processes subserving both Șhotș and Școldș domains. Although several studies have suggested that prefrontal tDCS can enhance neuropsychological outcomes, meta-analyses have reported conflicting results. Therefore, we aimed to assess the available evidence by performing an umbrella review of meta-analyses. We evaluated the effects of prefrontal active vs sham tDCS on different domains of cognition among healthy and neuropsychiatric individuals. A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 was employed to evaluate the quality of meta-analyses, and the GRADE system was employed to grade the quality of evidence of every comparison from each meta-analysis. PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched, and 11 meta-analyses were included resulting in 55 comparisons. Only 16 comparisons reported significant effects favoring tDCS, but 13 of them had either very low or low quality of evidence. Of the remaining 39 comparisons which reported non-significant effects, 38 had either very low or low quality of evidence. Meta-analyses were rated as having critically low and low quality. Among several reasons to explain these findings, the lack of consensus and reproducibility in tDCS research is discussed. Oxford University Press 2020-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8866814/ /pubmed/32577732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa084 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Manuscript
Farhat, Luis C
Carvalho, Andre F
Solmi, Marco
Brunoni, Andre R
Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS
title Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS
title_full Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS
title_fullStr Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS
title_full_unstemmed Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS
title_short Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS
title_sort evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tdcs
topic Original Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8866814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32577732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa084
work_keys_str_mv AT farhatluisc evidencebasedumbrellareviewofcognitiveeffectsofprefrontaltdcs
AT carvalhoandref evidencebasedumbrellareviewofcognitiveeffectsofprefrontaltdcs
AT solmimarco evidencebasedumbrellareviewofcognitiveeffectsofprefrontaltdcs
AT brunoniandrer evidencebasedumbrellareviewofcognitiveeffectsofprefrontaltdcs