Cargando…
Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, which has been increasingly used as an investigational tool in neuroscience. In social and affective neuroscience research, the prefrontal cortex has been primarily targeted, since this brain region is crit...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8866814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32577732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa084 |
_version_ | 1784655913742761984 |
---|---|
author | Farhat, Luis C Carvalho, Andre F Solmi, Marco Brunoni, Andre R |
author_facet | Farhat, Luis C Carvalho, Andre F Solmi, Marco Brunoni, Andre R |
author_sort | Farhat, Luis C |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, which has been increasingly used as an investigational tool in neuroscience. In social and affective neuroscience research, the prefrontal cortex has been primarily targeted, since this brain region is critically involved in complex psychobiological processes subserving both Șhotș and Școldș domains. Although several studies have suggested that prefrontal tDCS can enhance neuropsychological outcomes, meta-analyses have reported conflicting results. Therefore, we aimed to assess the available evidence by performing an umbrella review of meta-analyses. We evaluated the effects of prefrontal active vs sham tDCS on different domains of cognition among healthy and neuropsychiatric individuals. A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 was employed to evaluate the quality of meta-analyses, and the GRADE system was employed to grade the quality of evidence of every comparison from each meta-analysis. PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched, and 11 meta-analyses were included resulting in 55 comparisons. Only 16 comparisons reported significant effects favoring tDCS, but 13 of them had either very low or low quality of evidence. Of the remaining 39 comparisons which reported non-significant effects, 38 had either very low or low quality of evidence. Meta-analyses were rated as having critically low and low quality. Among several reasons to explain these findings, the lack of consensus and reproducibility in tDCS research is discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8866814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88668142022-02-24 Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS Farhat, Luis C Carvalho, Andre F Solmi, Marco Brunoni, Andre R Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Manuscript Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, which has been increasingly used as an investigational tool in neuroscience. In social and affective neuroscience research, the prefrontal cortex has been primarily targeted, since this brain region is critically involved in complex psychobiological processes subserving both Șhotș and Școldș domains. Although several studies have suggested that prefrontal tDCS can enhance neuropsychological outcomes, meta-analyses have reported conflicting results. Therefore, we aimed to assess the available evidence by performing an umbrella review of meta-analyses. We evaluated the effects of prefrontal active vs sham tDCS on different domains of cognition among healthy and neuropsychiatric individuals. A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 was employed to evaluate the quality of meta-analyses, and the GRADE system was employed to grade the quality of evidence of every comparison from each meta-analysis. PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched, and 11 meta-analyses were included resulting in 55 comparisons. Only 16 comparisons reported significant effects favoring tDCS, but 13 of them had either very low or low quality of evidence. Of the remaining 39 comparisons which reported non-significant effects, 38 had either very low or low quality of evidence. Meta-analyses were rated as having critically low and low quality. Among several reasons to explain these findings, the lack of consensus and reproducibility in tDCS research is discussed. Oxford University Press 2020-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8866814/ /pubmed/32577732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa084 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Manuscript Farhat, Luis C Carvalho, Andre F Solmi, Marco Brunoni, Andre R Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS |
title | Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS |
title_full | Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS |
title_fullStr | Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS |
title_short | Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS |
title_sort | evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tdcs |
topic | Original Manuscript |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8866814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32577732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT farhatluisc evidencebasedumbrellareviewofcognitiveeffectsofprefrontaltdcs AT carvalhoandref evidencebasedumbrellareviewofcognitiveeffectsofprefrontaltdcs AT solmimarco evidencebasedumbrellareviewofcognitiveeffectsofprefrontaltdcs AT brunoniandrer evidencebasedumbrellareviewofcognitiveeffectsofprefrontaltdcs |