Cargando…

A core outcome set for randomised controlled trials of physical activity interventions: development and challenges

BACKGROUND: Core outcome sets are standardised sets of outcomes that should be collected and reported for all clinical trials. They have been widely developed and are increasingly influential in clinical research, but despite this, their use in public health has been limited to date. The aim of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crocker, Helen, Peters, Michele, Foster, Charlie, Black, Nick, Fitzpatrick, Ray
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8866915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35209864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12600-7
_version_ 1784655937689092096
author Crocker, Helen
Peters, Michele
Foster, Charlie
Black, Nick
Fitzpatrick, Ray
author_facet Crocker, Helen
Peters, Michele
Foster, Charlie
Black, Nick
Fitzpatrick, Ray
author_sort Crocker, Helen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Core outcome sets are standardised sets of outcomes that should be collected and reported for all clinical trials. They have been widely developed and are increasingly influential in clinical research, but despite this, their use in public health has been limited to date. The aim of this study was to develop a core outcome set for public health trials evaluating interventions to promote physical activity in the general adult population. METHODS: The core outcome set was developed using a three-stage approach: stage one: a review of literature to identify potential domains for inclusion in the core outcome set; stage two: a Delphi survey was carried out to reach consensus about which outcome domains to include in the core outcome set; and stage three: a second Delphi survey was conducted to determine how best to measure the outcome domains included in the core outcome set. RESULTS: A classification of 13 outcome domains of physical activity was developed (stage one). Twenty people completed round one of the first Delphi survey (stage two), reaching a consensus to include two domains in the core outcome set, ‘device-based level of physical activity’ (80.0%, n = 16) and ‘health-related quality of life’ (70.0%, n = 14). No further consensus on the remaining outcome domains was reached in round two. Nineteen people completed the second Delphi survey (stage three). Participants rated the accelerometer (mean rating = 3.89, on a scale of 1 (do not recommend) to 5 (highly recommend)) as the best device to measure level of physical activity, and the EQ-5D (73.7%, n = 14) as the most appropriate measure of health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: This study has made progress towards the development of a core outcome set for use in physical activity trials, however, there was limited consensus about which domains to include. The development of the core outcome set was challenged by the need for trial-specific outcomes, and the complexities of collecting, processing and reporting device-based data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-12600-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8866915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88669152022-02-24 A core outcome set for randomised controlled trials of physical activity interventions: development and challenges Crocker, Helen Peters, Michele Foster, Charlie Black, Nick Fitzpatrick, Ray BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Core outcome sets are standardised sets of outcomes that should be collected and reported for all clinical trials. They have been widely developed and are increasingly influential in clinical research, but despite this, their use in public health has been limited to date. The aim of this study was to develop a core outcome set for public health trials evaluating interventions to promote physical activity in the general adult population. METHODS: The core outcome set was developed using a three-stage approach: stage one: a review of literature to identify potential domains for inclusion in the core outcome set; stage two: a Delphi survey was carried out to reach consensus about which outcome domains to include in the core outcome set; and stage three: a second Delphi survey was conducted to determine how best to measure the outcome domains included in the core outcome set. RESULTS: A classification of 13 outcome domains of physical activity was developed (stage one). Twenty people completed round one of the first Delphi survey (stage two), reaching a consensus to include two domains in the core outcome set, ‘device-based level of physical activity’ (80.0%, n = 16) and ‘health-related quality of life’ (70.0%, n = 14). No further consensus on the remaining outcome domains was reached in round two. Nineteen people completed the second Delphi survey (stage three). Participants rated the accelerometer (mean rating = 3.89, on a scale of 1 (do not recommend) to 5 (highly recommend)) as the best device to measure level of physical activity, and the EQ-5D (73.7%, n = 14) as the most appropriate measure of health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: This study has made progress towards the development of a core outcome set for use in physical activity trials, however, there was limited consensus about which domains to include. The development of the core outcome set was challenged by the need for trial-specific outcomes, and the complexities of collecting, processing and reporting device-based data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-12600-7. BioMed Central 2022-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8866915/ /pubmed/35209864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12600-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Crocker, Helen
Peters, Michele
Foster, Charlie
Black, Nick
Fitzpatrick, Ray
A core outcome set for randomised controlled trials of physical activity interventions: development and challenges
title A core outcome set for randomised controlled trials of physical activity interventions: development and challenges
title_full A core outcome set for randomised controlled trials of physical activity interventions: development and challenges
title_fullStr A core outcome set for randomised controlled trials of physical activity interventions: development and challenges
title_full_unstemmed A core outcome set for randomised controlled trials of physical activity interventions: development and challenges
title_short A core outcome set for randomised controlled trials of physical activity interventions: development and challenges
title_sort core outcome set for randomised controlled trials of physical activity interventions: development and challenges
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8866915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35209864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12600-7
work_keys_str_mv AT crockerhelen acoreoutcomesetforrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofphysicalactivityinterventionsdevelopmentandchallenges
AT petersmichele acoreoutcomesetforrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofphysicalactivityinterventionsdevelopmentandchallenges
AT fostercharlie acoreoutcomesetforrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofphysicalactivityinterventionsdevelopmentandchallenges
AT blacknick acoreoutcomesetforrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofphysicalactivityinterventionsdevelopmentandchallenges
AT fitzpatrickray acoreoutcomesetforrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofphysicalactivityinterventionsdevelopmentandchallenges
AT crockerhelen coreoutcomesetforrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofphysicalactivityinterventionsdevelopmentandchallenges
AT petersmichele coreoutcomesetforrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofphysicalactivityinterventionsdevelopmentandchallenges
AT fostercharlie coreoutcomesetforrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofphysicalactivityinterventionsdevelopmentandchallenges
AT blacknick coreoutcomesetforrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofphysicalactivityinterventionsdevelopmentandchallenges
AT fitzpatrickray coreoutcomesetforrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofphysicalactivityinterventionsdevelopmentandchallenges