Cargando…

Reduced Acquisition Time [(18)F]GE-180 PET Scanning Protocol Replaces Gold-Standard Dynamic Acquisition in a Mouse Ischemic Stroke Model

AIM: Understanding neuroinflammation after acute ischemic stroke is a crucial step on the way to an individualized post-stroke treatment. Microglia activation, an essential part of neuroinflammation, can be assessed using [(18)F]GE-180 18 kDa translocator protein positron emission tomography (TSPO-P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zatcepin, Artem, Heindl, Steffanie, Schillinger, Ulrike, Kaiser, Lena, Lindner, Simon, Bartenstein, Peter, Kopczak, Anna, Liesz, Arthur, Brendel, Matthias, Ziegler, Sibylle I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8866959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35223925
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.830020
_version_ 1784655948582748160
author Zatcepin, Artem
Heindl, Steffanie
Schillinger, Ulrike
Kaiser, Lena
Lindner, Simon
Bartenstein, Peter
Kopczak, Anna
Liesz, Arthur
Brendel, Matthias
Ziegler, Sibylle I.
author_facet Zatcepin, Artem
Heindl, Steffanie
Schillinger, Ulrike
Kaiser, Lena
Lindner, Simon
Bartenstein, Peter
Kopczak, Anna
Liesz, Arthur
Brendel, Matthias
Ziegler, Sibylle I.
author_sort Zatcepin, Artem
collection PubMed
description AIM: Understanding neuroinflammation after acute ischemic stroke is a crucial step on the way to an individualized post-stroke treatment. Microglia activation, an essential part of neuroinflammation, can be assessed using [(18)F]GE-180 18 kDa translocator protein positron emission tomography (TSPO-PET). However, the commonly used 60–90 min post-injection (p.i.) time window was not yet proven to be suitable for post-stroke neuroinflammation assessment. In this study, we compare semi-quantitative estimates derived from late time frames to quantitative estimates calculated using a full 0–90 min dynamic scan in a mouse photothrombotic stroke (PT) model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six mice after PT and six sham mice were included in the study. For a half of the mice, we acquired four serial 0–90 min scans per mouse (analysis cohort) and calculated standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs; cerebellar reference) for the PT volume of interest (VOI) in five late 10 min time frames as well as distribution volume ratios (DVRs) for the same VOI. We compared late static 10 min SUVRs and the 60–90 min time frame of the analysis cohort to the corresponding DVRs by linear fitting. The other half of the animals received a static 60–90 min scan and was used as a validation cohort. We extrapolated DVRs by using the static 60–90 min p.i. time window, which were compared to the DVRs of the analysis cohort. RESULTS: We found high linear correlations between SUVRs and DVRs in the analysis cohort for all studied 10 min time frames, while the fits of the 60–70, 70–80, and 80–90 min p.i. time frames were the ones closest to the line of identity. For the 60–90 min time window, we observed an excellent linear correlation between SUVR and DVR regardless of the phenotype (PT vs. sham). The extrapolated DVRs of the validation cohort were not significantly different from the DVRs of the analysis group. CONCLUSION: Simplified quantification by a reference tissue ratio of the late 60–90 min p.i. [(18)F]GE-180 PET image can replace full quantification of a dynamic scan for assessment of microglial activation in the mouse PT model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8866959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88669592022-02-25 Reduced Acquisition Time [(18)F]GE-180 PET Scanning Protocol Replaces Gold-Standard Dynamic Acquisition in a Mouse Ischemic Stroke Model Zatcepin, Artem Heindl, Steffanie Schillinger, Ulrike Kaiser, Lena Lindner, Simon Bartenstein, Peter Kopczak, Anna Liesz, Arthur Brendel, Matthias Ziegler, Sibylle I. Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine AIM: Understanding neuroinflammation after acute ischemic stroke is a crucial step on the way to an individualized post-stroke treatment. Microglia activation, an essential part of neuroinflammation, can be assessed using [(18)F]GE-180 18 kDa translocator protein positron emission tomography (TSPO-PET). However, the commonly used 60–90 min post-injection (p.i.) time window was not yet proven to be suitable for post-stroke neuroinflammation assessment. In this study, we compare semi-quantitative estimates derived from late time frames to quantitative estimates calculated using a full 0–90 min dynamic scan in a mouse photothrombotic stroke (PT) model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six mice after PT and six sham mice were included in the study. For a half of the mice, we acquired four serial 0–90 min scans per mouse (analysis cohort) and calculated standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs; cerebellar reference) for the PT volume of interest (VOI) in five late 10 min time frames as well as distribution volume ratios (DVRs) for the same VOI. We compared late static 10 min SUVRs and the 60–90 min time frame of the analysis cohort to the corresponding DVRs by linear fitting. The other half of the animals received a static 60–90 min scan and was used as a validation cohort. We extrapolated DVRs by using the static 60–90 min p.i. time window, which were compared to the DVRs of the analysis cohort. RESULTS: We found high linear correlations between SUVRs and DVRs in the analysis cohort for all studied 10 min time frames, while the fits of the 60–70, 70–80, and 80–90 min p.i. time frames were the ones closest to the line of identity. For the 60–90 min time window, we observed an excellent linear correlation between SUVR and DVR regardless of the phenotype (PT vs. sham). The extrapolated DVRs of the validation cohort were not significantly different from the DVRs of the analysis group. CONCLUSION: Simplified quantification by a reference tissue ratio of the late 60–90 min p.i. [(18)F]GE-180 PET image can replace full quantification of a dynamic scan for assessment of microglial activation in the mouse PT model. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8866959/ /pubmed/35223925 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.830020 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zatcepin, Heindl, Schillinger, Kaiser, Lindner, Bartenstein, Kopczak, Liesz, Brendel and Ziegler. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Zatcepin, Artem
Heindl, Steffanie
Schillinger, Ulrike
Kaiser, Lena
Lindner, Simon
Bartenstein, Peter
Kopczak, Anna
Liesz, Arthur
Brendel, Matthias
Ziegler, Sibylle I.
Reduced Acquisition Time [(18)F]GE-180 PET Scanning Protocol Replaces Gold-Standard Dynamic Acquisition in a Mouse Ischemic Stroke Model
title Reduced Acquisition Time [(18)F]GE-180 PET Scanning Protocol Replaces Gold-Standard Dynamic Acquisition in a Mouse Ischemic Stroke Model
title_full Reduced Acquisition Time [(18)F]GE-180 PET Scanning Protocol Replaces Gold-Standard Dynamic Acquisition in a Mouse Ischemic Stroke Model
title_fullStr Reduced Acquisition Time [(18)F]GE-180 PET Scanning Protocol Replaces Gold-Standard Dynamic Acquisition in a Mouse Ischemic Stroke Model
title_full_unstemmed Reduced Acquisition Time [(18)F]GE-180 PET Scanning Protocol Replaces Gold-Standard Dynamic Acquisition in a Mouse Ischemic Stroke Model
title_short Reduced Acquisition Time [(18)F]GE-180 PET Scanning Protocol Replaces Gold-Standard Dynamic Acquisition in a Mouse Ischemic Stroke Model
title_sort reduced acquisition time [(18)f]ge-180 pet scanning protocol replaces gold-standard dynamic acquisition in a mouse ischemic stroke model
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8866959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35223925
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.830020
work_keys_str_mv AT zatcepinartem reducedacquisitiontime18fge180petscanningprotocolreplacesgoldstandarddynamicacquisitioninamouseischemicstrokemodel
AT heindlsteffanie reducedacquisitiontime18fge180petscanningprotocolreplacesgoldstandarddynamicacquisitioninamouseischemicstrokemodel
AT schillingerulrike reducedacquisitiontime18fge180petscanningprotocolreplacesgoldstandarddynamicacquisitioninamouseischemicstrokemodel
AT kaiserlena reducedacquisitiontime18fge180petscanningprotocolreplacesgoldstandarddynamicacquisitioninamouseischemicstrokemodel
AT lindnersimon reducedacquisitiontime18fge180petscanningprotocolreplacesgoldstandarddynamicacquisitioninamouseischemicstrokemodel
AT bartensteinpeter reducedacquisitiontime18fge180petscanningprotocolreplacesgoldstandarddynamicacquisitioninamouseischemicstrokemodel
AT kopczakanna reducedacquisitiontime18fge180petscanningprotocolreplacesgoldstandarddynamicacquisitioninamouseischemicstrokemodel
AT lieszarthur reducedacquisitiontime18fge180petscanningprotocolreplacesgoldstandarddynamicacquisitioninamouseischemicstrokemodel
AT brendelmatthias reducedacquisitiontime18fge180petscanningprotocolreplacesgoldstandarddynamicacquisitioninamouseischemicstrokemodel
AT zieglersibyllei reducedacquisitiontime18fge180petscanningprotocolreplacesgoldstandarddynamicacquisitioninamouseischemicstrokemodel