Cargando…

The Unfulfilled Promise of Inhaled Therapy in Ventilator-Associated Infections: Where Do We Go from Here?

Respiratory infection is common in intubated/tracheotomized patients and systemic antibiotic therapy is often unrewarding. In 1967, the difficulty in treating Gram-negative respiratory infections led to the use of inhaled gentamicin, targeting therapy directly to the lungs. Fifty-three years later,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palmer, Lucy B., Smaldone, Gerald C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8867107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35099284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2021.0023
_version_ 1784655982572339200
author Palmer, Lucy B.
Smaldone, Gerald C.
author_facet Palmer, Lucy B.
Smaldone, Gerald C.
author_sort Palmer, Lucy B.
collection PubMed
description Respiratory infection is common in intubated/tracheotomized patients and systemic antibiotic therapy is often unrewarding. In 1967, the difficulty in treating Gram-negative respiratory infections led to the use of inhaled gentamicin, targeting therapy directly to the lungs. Fifty-three years later, the effects of topical therapy in the intubated patient remain undefined. Clinical failures with intravenous antibiotics persist and instrumented patients are now infected by many more multidrug-resistant Gram-negative species as well as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that there may be a role for inhaled delivery but “more research is needed.” Yet there is still no Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved inhaled antibiotic for the treatment of ventilator-associated infection, the hallmark of which is the foreign body in the upper airway. Current pulmonary and infectious disease guidelines suggest using aerosols only in the setting of Gram-negative infections that are resistant to all systemic antibiotics or not to use them at all. Recently two seemingly well-designed large randomized placebo-controlled Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials of adjunctive inhaled therapy for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia failed to show more rapid resolution of pneumonia symptoms or effect on mortality. Despite evolving technology of delivery devices and more detailed understanding of the factors affecting delivery, treatment effects were no better than placebo. What is wrong with our approach to ventilator- associated infection? Is there a message from the large meta-analyses and these two large recent multisite trials? This review will suggest why current therapies are unpredictable and have not fulfilled the promise of better outcomes. Data suggest that future studies of inhaled therapy, in the milieu of worsening bacterial resistance, require new approaches with completely different indications and endpoints to determine whether inhaled therapy indeed has an important role in the treatment of ventilated patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8867107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88671072022-02-24 The Unfulfilled Promise of Inhaled Therapy in Ventilator-Associated Infections: Where Do We Go from Here? Palmer, Lucy B. Smaldone, Gerald C. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv Invited Review Respiratory infection is common in intubated/tracheotomized patients and systemic antibiotic therapy is often unrewarding. In 1967, the difficulty in treating Gram-negative respiratory infections led to the use of inhaled gentamicin, targeting therapy directly to the lungs. Fifty-three years later, the effects of topical therapy in the intubated patient remain undefined. Clinical failures with intravenous antibiotics persist and instrumented patients are now infected by many more multidrug-resistant Gram-negative species as well as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that there may be a role for inhaled delivery but “more research is needed.” Yet there is still no Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved inhaled antibiotic for the treatment of ventilator-associated infection, the hallmark of which is the foreign body in the upper airway. Current pulmonary and infectious disease guidelines suggest using aerosols only in the setting of Gram-negative infections that are resistant to all systemic antibiotics or not to use them at all. Recently two seemingly well-designed large randomized placebo-controlled Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials of adjunctive inhaled therapy for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia failed to show more rapid resolution of pneumonia symptoms or effect on mortality. Despite evolving technology of delivery devices and more detailed understanding of the factors affecting delivery, treatment effects were no better than placebo. What is wrong with our approach to ventilator- associated infection? Is there a message from the large meta-analyses and these two large recent multisite trials? This review will suggest why current therapies are unpredictable and have not fulfilled the promise of better outcomes. Data suggest that future studies of inhaled therapy, in the milieu of worsening bacterial resistance, require new approaches with completely different indications and endpoints to determine whether inhaled therapy indeed has an important role in the treatment of ventilated patients. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022-02-01 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8867107/ /pubmed/35099284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2021.0023 Text en © Lucy B. Palmer and Gerald C. Smaldone, 2022. Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Invited Review
Palmer, Lucy B.
Smaldone, Gerald C.
The Unfulfilled Promise of Inhaled Therapy in Ventilator-Associated Infections: Where Do We Go from Here?
title The Unfulfilled Promise of Inhaled Therapy in Ventilator-Associated Infections: Where Do We Go from Here?
title_full The Unfulfilled Promise of Inhaled Therapy in Ventilator-Associated Infections: Where Do We Go from Here?
title_fullStr The Unfulfilled Promise of Inhaled Therapy in Ventilator-Associated Infections: Where Do We Go from Here?
title_full_unstemmed The Unfulfilled Promise of Inhaled Therapy in Ventilator-Associated Infections: Where Do We Go from Here?
title_short The Unfulfilled Promise of Inhaled Therapy in Ventilator-Associated Infections: Where Do We Go from Here?
title_sort unfulfilled promise of inhaled therapy in ventilator-associated infections: where do we go from here?
topic Invited Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8867107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35099284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2021.0023
work_keys_str_mv AT palmerlucyb theunfulfilledpromiseofinhaledtherapyinventilatorassociatedinfectionswheredowegofromhere
AT smaldonegeraldc theunfulfilledpromiseofinhaledtherapyinventilatorassociatedinfectionswheredowegofromhere
AT palmerlucyb unfulfilledpromiseofinhaledtherapyinventilatorassociatedinfectionswheredowegofromhere
AT smaldonegeraldc unfulfilledpromiseofinhaledtherapyinventilatorassociatedinfectionswheredowegofromhere