Cargando…
National application of the European visual field standards for driving: a survey study
AIMS: To provide an overview of how the European visual field standards for driving (specified in Commission Directive 2009/113/EC) are applied and determine whether individuals with visual field defects are treated equally across Europe. METHODS: One ophthalmic expert from each of 32 European count...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8867315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000904 |
_version_ | 1784656029129113600 |
---|---|
author | Sudmann, Thea Melsen Jonsdottir, Thora Elisabet Rowe, Fiona J Jørstad, Øystein Kalsnes |
author_facet | Sudmann, Thea Melsen Jonsdottir, Thora Elisabet Rowe, Fiona J Jørstad, Øystein Kalsnes |
author_sort | Sudmann, Thea Melsen |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To provide an overview of how the European visual field standards for driving (specified in Commission Directive 2009/113/EC) are applied and determine whether individuals with visual field defects are treated equally across Europe. METHODS: One ophthalmic expert from each of 32 European countries was invited to participate in an electronic survey. They were presented with threshold and Esterman perimetry results of 15 cases of visual field defects and asked to classify each case as either passed or failed in reference to their national standards. The results were compared with the European Driving Test Group 1 (EDT1), which is a new perimetry algorithm that adheres to the recommendations by the Eyesight Working Group. Fleiss’ kappa was used to determine the inter-rater agreement. RESULTS: Twenty-five countries responded. Three of 15 cases were passed by all. Full agreement on a failed case was not reached. Denmark graded most leniently and passed 12 cases. Bulgaria, Romania and Slovakia graded most strictly and passed five cases. The Fleiss’ kappa score was 0.52 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.55). Only Slovenia was in full agreement with the EDT1. Fifteen countries endorsed specific perimetric tests for assessing fitness to drive. Five of these also defined pass/fail criteria. CONCLUSION: The directive fails to establish a uniform approach to the visual field requirements, as evident by moderate pass/fail agreement between the national experts. Because the visual standards for driving are enforced differently, identical visual field loss can result in either revocation or approval of a driving license. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8867315 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88673152022-03-15 National application of the European visual field standards for driving: a survey study Sudmann, Thea Melsen Jonsdottir, Thora Elisabet Rowe, Fiona J Jørstad, Øystein Kalsnes BMJ Open Ophthalmol Original Research AIMS: To provide an overview of how the European visual field standards for driving (specified in Commission Directive 2009/113/EC) are applied and determine whether individuals with visual field defects are treated equally across Europe. METHODS: One ophthalmic expert from each of 32 European countries was invited to participate in an electronic survey. They were presented with threshold and Esterman perimetry results of 15 cases of visual field defects and asked to classify each case as either passed or failed in reference to their national standards. The results were compared with the European Driving Test Group 1 (EDT1), which is a new perimetry algorithm that adheres to the recommendations by the Eyesight Working Group. Fleiss’ kappa was used to determine the inter-rater agreement. RESULTS: Twenty-five countries responded. Three of 15 cases were passed by all. Full agreement on a failed case was not reached. Denmark graded most leniently and passed 12 cases. Bulgaria, Romania and Slovakia graded most strictly and passed five cases. The Fleiss’ kappa score was 0.52 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.55). Only Slovenia was in full agreement with the EDT1. Fifteen countries endorsed specific perimetric tests for assessing fitness to drive. Five of these also defined pass/fail criteria. CONCLUSION: The directive fails to establish a uniform approach to the visual field requirements, as evident by moderate pass/fail agreement between the national experts. Because the visual standards for driving are enforced differently, identical visual field loss can result in either revocation or approval of a driving license. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8867315/ /pubmed/35295687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000904 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sudmann, Thea Melsen Jonsdottir, Thora Elisabet Rowe, Fiona J Jørstad, Øystein Kalsnes National application of the European visual field standards for driving: a survey study |
title | National application of the European visual field standards for driving: a survey study |
title_full | National application of the European visual field standards for driving: a survey study |
title_fullStr | National application of the European visual field standards for driving: a survey study |
title_full_unstemmed | National application of the European visual field standards for driving: a survey study |
title_short | National application of the European visual field standards for driving: a survey study |
title_sort | national application of the european visual field standards for driving: a survey study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8867315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000904 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sudmanntheamelsen nationalapplicationoftheeuropeanvisualfieldstandardsfordrivingasurveystudy AT jonsdottirthoraelisabet nationalapplicationoftheeuropeanvisualfieldstandardsfordrivingasurveystudy AT rowefionaj nationalapplicationoftheeuropeanvisualfieldstandardsfordrivingasurveystudy AT jørstadøysteinkalsnes nationalapplicationoftheeuropeanvisualfieldstandardsfordrivingasurveystudy |