Cargando…
Key factors influencing the effectiveness of hospital quality management tools: using the quality control circle as an example–a cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVE: To identify the key factors influencing the effectiveness of hospital quality management tools and analyse the mechanisms needed for long-term scientific hospital management. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a large number of participants in quality control circle (QCC) activities...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8867332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049577 |
_version_ | 1784656033160888320 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Dan Yan, Yue Liu, Ting-Fang |
author_facet | Zhang, Dan Yan, Yue Liu, Ting-Fang |
author_sort | Zhang, Dan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To identify the key factors influencing the effectiveness of hospital quality management tools and analyse the mechanisms needed for long-term scientific hospital management. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a large number of participants in quality control circle (QCC) activities were investigated on site. Data were collected by the questionnaire during the sixth National Hospital Quality Control Circle Competition in Shandong, China, in October 2018. A total of 1500 participants were randomly selected, in which 1316 questionnaires were completed, yielding an overall response rate of 87.73%, and 1181 questionnaires were valid. We performed a stepwise regression analysis to identify the independent variables with explanatory ability. Then the total mean score of the organisational, group, and individual factors were introduced layer by layer, and a regression model with four levels was established. RESULTS: The application effectiveness of QCC activities can be divided into three dimensions: individual factors, group factors and organisational factors. Utility perception was the most important individual factor. Inappropriate incentives and rewards had a negative effect on both organisational effectiveness and individual effectiveness. The attitude and ability of the circle monitor and counsellors, the specificity of the goals were the key group factors. Of the organisational factors, activity orientation had the greatest impact. Among the three dimensions, individual factors had the most significant influence on the effectiveness of QCCs, followed by group factors, then by organisational factors. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that addressing the concerns of the leaders and implementing a safeguard system that protects the QCC tool from neglect or failure, that strengthening team building and using team rewards or non-material incentives to enhance enthusiasm, and that mobilising the enthusiasm of the circle members and even the whole hospital for using quality management tools are essential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8867332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88673322022-03-15 Key factors influencing the effectiveness of hospital quality management tools: using the quality control circle as an example–a cross-sectional study Zhang, Dan Yan, Yue Liu, Ting-Fang BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To identify the key factors influencing the effectiveness of hospital quality management tools and analyse the mechanisms needed for long-term scientific hospital management. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a large number of participants in quality control circle (QCC) activities were investigated on site. Data were collected by the questionnaire during the sixth National Hospital Quality Control Circle Competition in Shandong, China, in October 2018. A total of 1500 participants were randomly selected, in which 1316 questionnaires were completed, yielding an overall response rate of 87.73%, and 1181 questionnaires were valid. We performed a stepwise regression analysis to identify the independent variables with explanatory ability. Then the total mean score of the organisational, group, and individual factors were introduced layer by layer, and a regression model with four levels was established. RESULTS: The application effectiveness of QCC activities can be divided into three dimensions: individual factors, group factors and organisational factors. Utility perception was the most important individual factor. Inappropriate incentives and rewards had a negative effect on both organisational effectiveness and individual effectiveness. The attitude and ability of the circle monitor and counsellors, the specificity of the goals were the key group factors. Of the organisational factors, activity orientation had the greatest impact. Among the three dimensions, individual factors had the most significant influence on the effectiveness of QCCs, followed by group factors, then by organisational factors. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that addressing the concerns of the leaders and implementing a safeguard system that protects the QCC tool from neglect or failure, that strengthening team building and using team rewards or non-material incentives to enhance enthusiasm, and that mobilising the enthusiasm of the circle members and even the whole hospital for using quality management tools are essential. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8867332/ /pubmed/35193899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049577 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Zhang, Dan Yan, Yue Liu, Ting-Fang Key factors influencing the effectiveness of hospital quality management tools: using the quality control circle as an example–a cross-sectional study |
title | Key factors influencing the effectiveness of hospital quality management tools: using the quality control circle as an example–a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Key factors influencing the effectiveness of hospital quality management tools: using the quality control circle as an example–a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Key factors influencing the effectiveness of hospital quality management tools: using the quality control circle as an example–a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Key factors influencing the effectiveness of hospital quality management tools: using the quality control circle as an example–a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Key factors influencing the effectiveness of hospital quality management tools: using the quality control circle as an example–a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | key factors influencing the effectiveness of hospital quality management tools: using the quality control circle as an example–a cross-sectional study |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8867332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049577 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangdan keyfactorsinfluencingtheeffectivenessofhospitalqualitymanagementtoolsusingthequalitycontrolcircleasanexampleacrosssectionalstudy AT yanyue keyfactorsinfluencingtheeffectivenessofhospitalqualitymanagementtoolsusingthequalitycontrolcircleasanexampleacrosssectionalstudy AT liutingfang keyfactorsinfluencingtheeffectivenessofhospitalqualitymanagementtoolsusingthequalitycontrolcircleasanexampleacrosssectionalstudy |