Cargando…

DFT Case Study on the Comparison of Ruthenium-Catalyzed C–H Allylation, C–H Alkenylation, and Hydroarylation

[Image: see text] Density functional calculations at the B3LYP-D3+IDSCRF/TZP-DKH(-dfg) level of theory have been performed to understand the mechanism of ruthenium-catalyzed C–H allylation reported in the literature in depth. The plausible pathway consisted of four sequential processes, including C–...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Lei, Wang, Ling-Ling, Fang, De-Cai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8867598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35224376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c06584
_version_ 1784656085840297984
author Zhang, Lei
Wang, Ling-Ling
Fang, De-Cai
author_facet Zhang, Lei
Wang, Ling-Ling
Fang, De-Cai
author_sort Zhang, Lei
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Density functional calculations at the B3LYP-D3+IDSCRF/TZP-DKH(-dfg) level of theory have been performed to understand the mechanism of ruthenium-catalyzed C–H allylation reported in the literature in depth. The plausible pathway consisted of four sequential processes, including C–H activation, migratory insertion, amide extrusion, and recovery of the catalyst, in which C–H activation was identified as the rate-determining step. The amide extrusion step could be promoted kinetically by trifluoroacetic acid since its mediation lowered the free-energy barrier from 32.1 to 12.2 kcal/mol. Additional calculations have been performed to explore other common pathways between arenes and alkenes, such as C–H alkenylation and hydroarylation. A comparison of the amide extrusion and β-H elimination steps established the following reactivity sequence of the leaving groups: protonated amide group > β-H group > unprotonated amide group. The suppression of hydroarylation was attributed to the sluggishness of the Ru–C protonation step as compared to the amide extrusion step. This study can unveil factors favoring the C–H allylation reaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8867598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88675982022-02-25 DFT Case Study on the Comparison of Ruthenium-Catalyzed C–H Allylation, C–H Alkenylation, and Hydroarylation Zhang, Lei Wang, Ling-Ling Fang, De-Cai ACS Omega [Image: see text] Density functional calculations at the B3LYP-D3+IDSCRF/TZP-DKH(-dfg) level of theory have been performed to understand the mechanism of ruthenium-catalyzed C–H allylation reported in the literature in depth. The plausible pathway consisted of four sequential processes, including C–H activation, migratory insertion, amide extrusion, and recovery of the catalyst, in which C–H activation was identified as the rate-determining step. The amide extrusion step could be promoted kinetically by trifluoroacetic acid since its mediation lowered the free-energy barrier from 32.1 to 12.2 kcal/mol. Additional calculations have been performed to explore other common pathways between arenes and alkenes, such as C–H alkenylation and hydroarylation. A comparison of the amide extrusion and β-H elimination steps established the following reactivity sequence of the leaving groups: protonated amide group > β-H group > unprotonated amide group. The suppression of hydroarylation was attributed to the sluggishness of the Ru–C protonation step as compared to the amide extrusion step. This study can unveil factors favoring the C–H allylation reaction. American Chemical Society 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8867598/ /pubmed/35224376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c06584 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Zhang, Lei
Wang, Ling-Ling
Fang, De-Cai
DFT Case Study on the Comparison of Ruthenium-Catalyzed C–H Allylation, C–H Alkenylation, and Hydroarylation
title DFT Case Study on the Comparison of Ruthenium-Catalyzed C–H Allylation, C–H Alkenylation, and Hydroarylation
title_full DFT Case Study on the Comparison of Ruthenium-Catalyzed C–H Allylation, C–H Alkenylation, and Hydroarylation
title_fullStr DFT Case Study on the Comparison of Ruthenium-Catalyzed C–H Allylation, C–H Alkenylation, and Hydroarylation
title_full_unstemmed DFT Case Study on the Comparison of Ruthenium-Catalyzed C–H Allylation, C–H Alkenylation, and Hydroarylation
title_short DFT Case Study on the Comparison of Ruthenium-Catalyzed C–H Allylation, C–H Alkenylation, and Hydroarylation
title_sort dft case study on the comparison of ruthenium-catalyzed c–h allylation, c–h alkenylation, and hydroarylation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8867598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35224376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c06584
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanglei dftcasestudyonthecomparisonofrutheniumcatalyzedchallylationchalkenylationandhydroarylation
AT wanglingling dftcasestudyonthecomparisonofrutheniumcatalyzedchallylationchalkenylationandhydroarylation
AT fangdecai dftcasestudyonthecomparisonofrutheniumcatalyzedchallylationchalkenylationandhydroarylation